On Roman Imperialism: The Fall Of Rome

Sallust, a highly regarded Roman historian, commented that “…fear of its enemies preserved the food morals of the state, but when the people were relived of this fear, the favourite vices of prosperity-licence and pride-appeared as a natural consequence”. This is corroborated by Florus, a criticized Roman historian and poet “The next hundred years were unhappy and deplorable because of internal calamities. The resources and wealth gained in our conquests spoiled the morals of the age and ruined the state, which was engulfed in its own vices as in a common sewer”. Both Sallust and Florus explain how Tiberius’ death caused the senate to resort to violence in order to keep their power. Consequently, the peace in Rome was disturbed and eventually led to the fall of Rome.

This is shown in the text where it says, “Under pressure on the two frontiers, the Romans started to squabble among themselves. Civilians distrusted their own armies and the soldiers distrusted some of their commanders- even the emperor to whom they had sworn allegiance.” (Document 3a). This shows that another reason that caused the Roman empire to fall was because of its people starting to distrust each other. When the people distrust each other, nothing in an empire can really be done

In this essay the reason for Rome’s fall will be identified and why they caused Rome’s downfall. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome are military problems, untrustworthy government/injustice, and natural disasters/diseases. One of the reasons Rome fell is due to the fact Rome had multiple Military problems. According to Document B “because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it” (Doc B). Also according to Document B, “soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for chest and head and were often beaten by archers” (Doc B).

The people would suffer more and more want, and yet the amount of territory and goods controlled and imported by Rome from its provinces was vast and varied, from fine cloth to precious metals, wild animals to cereals. As well, Rome developed a sophisticated coinage system to further facilitate buying and selling, though most of that wealth, too, remained in the hands of the same elite, who built and took advantage of the extensive Roman roads, sea routes, and the military to keep their own profit flowing. Ultimately, Rome's economy was a complex beast with little thought of sustainability. Rather, territories were conquered by the huge Roman army, and profit from taxes and new access to goods soon resulted, giving the corrupt and greedy the confidence that resources would be unlimited. Sustainability nor employment opportunities were not a consideration, and the common people could do nothing but live with it and tell themselves that it was traditional and good for Rome while watching the free shows that the rich paid for to keep them pliable and

“The division of the empire made it more easily governed in the short term, but over time the two halves drifted apart,”(Doc 9). When the halves drifted apart, they had trouble working together to fight off all of the invaders, and they started to fight over materials. In addition, when the Eastern Empire began to grow strong while the Western was weak, the invaders decided to attack the Western Empire more, causing Rome to weaken even more. Also, Rome had a problem getting leaders that lasted longer than a few years. Rome had 19 different leaders from 235 to 285 CE, and at least 15 of them were murdered (Doc 1).

Rome was a very powerful empire, but eventually fell because of one thing, weak political leadership. Weak political leadership was the main reason why Rome fell and it was more of a chain because when there is bad leadership then there is bad military and more invaders. The invasions got more effective and hurt the empire a lot more than it should have at that time. First of all Rome went from a republic to a empire with all the power and rights from the people slowly slipping away to the all powerful emperors at the end. Emperors did not want to share any power with the people which was very bad because they only paid attention to power, for example how Julius Caesar get kill/assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE in Rome, Italy.

Greece and Rome is a very heated decision in which one had more of an impact on the mediterranean area. Both places greatly affected it. When it comes down to it, I think Rome affected it greater, even if it has its flaws. There are also reasons that greece affected it, but I think Rome affected it greater. Rome was at one time the greatest empire in the world.

The upper class of Rome gradually became more selfish and turned away from their jobs that once originally characterized their empire. Cultural decline caused by new commitments of the upper classes and lack of political authority also lead to the downfall of Rome. All these conflicts resulted in a spiral that steadily worsened. Explaining why the fall pf Rome left a bigger impact than the fall of the Han.

Fall of Rome DBQ Including most of the Mediterranean world, Rome, a city that was growing big enough to become one of the world’s largest empire’s would soon slowly fall apart because of their problems. In 27 BC, Rome’s first emperor, Augustus Caesar, took complete power. During his time, he ruled with Pax Romana, a time of Roman peace which lasted for almost 200 years. After his death, the Roman Empire begun to break apart. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome was it being geographically too big; the population was decreasing due to plagues which led to the Roman army becoming weak, social and military issues and laziness of the military would guide the army down which led to cities being lost, and their government and leadership issues of the weak or selfish power leaders would all conduct to the breaking up of Rome.

However, over successive years, there were religious and linguistic barriers that prevented further cooperation and inhibited any trials for re-union. Furthermore, the eastern province became more powerful and fortified its boundaries and this diverted the barbarian attacks towards the western empire. Most historians believe that the Barbarians at northern boundaries of the Rome’s empire were the most significant

1600 years ago the mediterranean people were doing the same thing that us modern day people are doing now, conquering, claiming, and fighting, but why were they doing this, and who were they doing it too? The Roman empire was one of the strongest empires in history, the “superpower of the Mediterranean world”. In 750 BCE Rome was founded and over time Rome’s wealth, territory, and popularity grew and grew as time went on. They conquered the land of Scotland and Spain, began to control the whole Mediterranean sea, established some colonies around North Africa, the middle east, Asia Minor, and Egypt. They were beginning to expand their empire into almost the entire continents of Asia, Europe, and Africa.

The Hans and the imperialistic Romans entered the scene at a crucial time when many societies were facing different issues, and their administrative techniques led to how countries are run today. Comparing past political forces is key to understanding why structures exist today as is, and allows a chance to learn from past failures that were repeated over a variety of

Living in such an enormous empire had its benefits. As a Roman, you had education, culture and the protection of the largest military empire on your side. Living in this Empire also had some notable drawbacks. The empire had extreme poverty rates, threats of being in a constant state of war, and the government could impose huge tax burdens on the people.

Due to the expansion, it was hard for the rulers and government officials to communicate and protect the Empire. Therefore Romans ruled over more land than they could manage. The Roman Empire was stretched across Europe, much of middle East, and the north coast of Africa. It surrounded the Mediterranean. Since all those places came under the Roman Empire, the rulers had to protect

In return, Romans wanted their allies to contribute soldiers into their growing armies. Many territories thought that being part of an empire was safer than being alone. With an empire came protection from outside invaders, laws to keep everyone