Far before abortions became such a widely discussed political issue, and close to forty years before Roe v. Wade, Gwendolyn Brooks took a risk by writing a blatantly honest poem about her experiences with her own abortions. “The mother” by Gwendolyn Brooks is a poem written in 1945 in which the speaker opens up about her emotional experiences struggling and coming to peace with getting abortions. In “The mother,” having a woman author is crucial. Brooks, as a woman, is able to provide a perspective on something that no man would ever be able to comment on so deeply. Brooks begins the poem with a title, “the mother,” that critiques how society views the term mother. She is calling herself a mother, because even though she never had children, …show more content…
For example, the first stanza is all written in the second person, and discusses abortions generally, showing what all women go through, and normalizing what a woman goes through when getting one. When Brooks writes, “you remember the children you got that you did not get,” she illustrates that anyone could go through this, and it may be “you” at some point in your life, even if that it unimaginable at this moment (Brooks 2). Clearly, this will influence people to realize that the issue of abortions should be discussed with a respectful attitude towards the woman, because abortions are normal in society, and usually received because otherwise, the child would in some way and for a variety of reasons, have a negative quality of life. By contrast, in the second stanza, Brooks uses first person to move further into her personal story. At this point, it is proven that the issue of abortions is universal, but she chooses to contemplate her own decisions and give her own perspective. She describes her children in her own story as, “My dim dears at the breasts they could never suck” (line 13). The use of “dim” to describe them shows that they did exist, but in a dark, far away, and low-lit place in her memory and the world. She uses “they” instead of “you” because she at this …show more content…
Rhymes are intentional and when rhymes are placed, the narrator is emotionally stable and able to concentrate. But, throughout the poem, she stops using rhymes when she loses control of her emotions and is instead ranting. “The mother” uses rhymes, similar to those of children’s nursery rhymes, to momentary bring the aborted children back to life, and make them able to concentrate on what the narrator is saying to make her children further understand why she made the decision that she did regarding getting an abortion. She ponders about, “If I stole your births and names, your straight baby tears and your games”, imagining her aborted children as real kids(17-18). She is discussing how she stripped them of their “tears” and “games” that they could have had in their lives if they were born, and she is blaming herself for these losses. But, her blame is in more of a mourning manner, and less of a regretting tone, making the reader feel empathy for her. She is sad about her decision, but most likely had to do it for a reason outside of her control. Additionally, at the end of the poem, Brooks writes, “Believe me, I loved you all. Believe me, I knew you, though faintly, and I loved, I loved you all”, rhyming “all” with itself (30-32). By
What is your worth? , what makes you happy? , what makes you sad or disappointed?. Life has ups and downs and turnarounds but do you give up?. Mother and Daughter by Gary Soto is and short little that discuss the hardship of this young girl named Yollie along with her mother.
The article"Putting Women Back in the Abortion Debate" by Ellen Willis makes a strong case for a fresh strategy in the abortion discussion that emphasizes the experiences and viewpoints of women. Her target audience is mostly individuals who are debating abortion, especially those who have historically been marginalized from the discussion, such as women and pro-choice activists. Willis' article aims to reframe the discussion by demonstrating how women's viewpoints and experiences are essential to comprehending the root of the issue. The phrase "bringing women back in the argument" is one rhetorical device Willis employs to further her objective.
Gianna Jenson, the author of a powerful speech regarding abortion, explained her horrible personal experience with the process when she explained in detail, her story at a pro-life speaking event. The audience was captivated by her language and the way she made the audience think about her speech and exactly how she delivered it. The author wrote this impactful speech in order to share her story with others and hope it would influence at least one person and alter their opinion. Gianna Jenson writes and effective argument against abortion in order to tell her own personal story by appealing to the reader’s sense of pathos, using rhetorical questioning and charged emotional language.
Rather than stating the argument, Willis poses it as a question, “Are the fetuses the moral equivalent of born human beings?” (Abortion Debate 76), thus showing how modern feminists can only support one side of the argument in their chosen stance, and cause limitations by doing so. In doing so, Willis shows how to some “extent… we objectify our enemy and define the terms of our struggle as might makes right, the struggle misses its point” (Ministries of Fear 210), which implies that feminists have completely missed the point of the argument by getting caught up in an answer. Rather than looking for a compromise or gray area, they exert their stance as the only solution that woman can have. Willis also shows how feminists fundamentally “see the primary goal of feminism as freeing omen from the imposition of so called ‘male values’, and creating an alternative culture based on ‘female values’”
While the mothers in neither Dobson’s nor Harwood’s poems are entirely content with the situations, they have found themselves in, they have ultimately chosen to make the necessary sacrifices because a mother’s love for her child is
Thank goodness, she turned out alright. But I’ll never risk it again. Never! The strain is simply too - too hellish,” (36). Larsen uses words provoking anxiety and horror to give the reader insight into Clare’s mind when she thinks about pregnancy and motherhood.
"We Real Cool" by Gwendolyn Brooks portrays the plight of the rebellious youth in all their glory. In this poem, the author utilizes unique meter and verse to add to the story she's conveying. The pool players in this poem are rogue youths and Brooks attempts to understand their lives. The tone conveyed in the poem adds a slightly ominous tint to the picture of the pool players. Brooks uses this poem to convey the plight of the pool player’s existence and urge the reader to see the fun the pool players have and also the looming consequences.
She made the painful decision of giving up her sick baby's life along with her own through suicide. It shows the extent of suffering caused by the system. This is shown through the quote "She just cries and cries like this. All the time. Because she knows what is coming.
When thinking of personal experiences, “The Mother” by Gwendolyn Brooks touches on the emotional topic of abortion. Even though this poem was published decades ago, it can still be seen very relevant to this day. Accepting abortion and the outcome can indeed be a challenging task for many, while others seem to adapt to it without much of a problem. Gwendolyn Brooks’ writing lets us take a look at the mothers view point of abortion and how a mother responds to her new situation. Throughout the poem, the speaker shows signs of grieving concern of the topic of abortion and its outcomes by presenting emotions of regret and memories, shame and guilt, and contradicting herself to almost justify what she has done.
Trying to prevent neglected children and back-alley abortions, Margaret Sanger gave the moving speech, “The Children’s Era,” in 1925 to spread information on the benefits and need for birth control and women's rights. Margaret Sanger--activist, educator, writer, and nurse--opened the first birth control clinic in the United States and established organizations that evolved into the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. During most of the 1900’s, birth control and abortions were illegal in the United States, causing women to give birth unwillingly to a child they must be fully responsible for. This caused illness and possible death for women attempting self-induced abortion. Sanger uses literary devices such as repetition and analogies
The argument over a woman’s right to choose over the life of an unborn baby has been a prevalent issue in America for many years. As a birth control activist, Margaret Sanger is recognized for her devotion to the pro-choice side of the debate as she has worked to provide sex education and legalize birth control. As part of her pro-choice movement, Sanger delivered a speech at the Sixth International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference in March of 1925. This speech is called “The Children’s Era,” in which she explains how she wants the twentieth century to become the “century of the child.” Margaret Sanger uses pathos throughout her speech as she brings up many of the negative possibilities that unplanned parenthood can bring for both children and parents.
Sallie Tisdale describes an uneducated sixteen-year-old girl that doesn’t even know how babies are formed. It was not the girl’s fault for getting pregnant; she was raped (Tisdale 416). Knowing this, the audience, like the author, feels compassion for the girl. It would be unfair to the girl if she couldn’t have the abortion. The audience recognizes that although abortion is cruel, it is needed.
This shows what she had to endure to try to keep her baby healthy. It appeals to the loving protective side of the reader. It makes them think about what the baby must be going through beacuase of their economic situation. Rhetorical questions are used to directly engage the
These last two lines in the poem prove that she still feels guilty for her broken heart, however she is done trying to stay strong and humble through it all. She needs others to feel for her while her heart aches. She says that she knew that the love between them would be no more. Her mind told her so but her heart needed to learn on its own time. She was so in love with the man, she could not let herself believe what her mind was already telling
The pain she felt is one feeling that is only felt by her, to understand that feeling you have to go through that same situation yourself but it’s a situation that is not wished upon anyone. In the first stanza the poet refers to the stillborn as “beautiful flower” which I completely agree upon as that is how babies whether alive or stillborn should be referred as. She uses metaphor in the first stanza, as a comparison between a stillborn and a beautiful flower.