Political Era Of Community Policing

“Circumspect Police Ends the Drop in Crime?” This debate topic speaks about police being less proactive, because of vitriol, and causing an increase in crime rates. This debate topic is not directly related to the book, Ghettoside, but falls into the same bracket. The debate talks about the police becoming less involved because of denunciation, and rates of crimes increasing because of that. Ghettoside talks about the black-on-black homicide rates going up, one reason, because of the ignorance of the police.

According to the text, many communities are in need of the potential benefits of the model are themselves characterized by crime, disorder, and mistrust of the police, making it very hard to successfully implement community. As for NSP, violence is power and reputation to gain over with other street gangs. According to Grant, “the growing trend within the communities to participate in the fight against crime and disorder has paralleled a growing recognition by the police that traditional crime-fighting tactics alone have a limited impact on controlling crime. Also, Community policing is the synthesis of these two movements” (Grant, pg. 297, 2008).

Since the beginning of recorded time, people have always wanted protection from danger. Real police work involves a police officer being able to serve and protect, police officers are suppose to enforce laws, maintain order and keep crime rate down. This essay will scrutinize Baltimore, as well as the broader struggle over crime and policing. The city of Baltimore, is disreputable for its substantially high crime rate, this includes a violent crime rate that ranks high above the national average. A majority of the issues in Baltimore fall under the mayor and the Police Commissioner.

Policing has been around a long time, ever since the 19th century to be more specific. In that span of time between the 19th century and today, policing has gone through many changes, to lead us to the state of policing we are in today, which is now a complete 180 from how it used to be. Way back when the first settlers came to America, communities actually policed themselves. They believed that this was the most effective way to uphold the law, or whatever they called it back then. They had many ways to keep people in line such as public disapproval, shunning, and even public humiliation.

The book Cop in the Hood made me more aware of what cops have to deal with now-a-days. There are several different policies that ensure people’s freedoms, however, that makes a cop’s job much more difficult. After reading this book I was also made aware how important people in society are to a cop. It makes their job easier, which in-turn allows society to be a safer place for all people. A cop is not able to stop all crimes without the help of society.

Local political control afforded police the chance to enhance populace being reactive to narrow requests. This also amplified police misconduct. In the nineteenth century the majority of police departments in the United States mirrored the circumstances contiguous to municipal agencies. The police became a significant element in the corrupt opinionated political sectors. Officers brought into the force were “hired and promoted solely on the basis of political loyalties and payoffs” (Sherman, 1974) .

If people become fearful of the Police it will decrease the likelihood of them wanting to work together. Causing crimes not to be reported and resulting in crime to be less likely to be detected, leading to a spike in crime rate. The need for the community and police to work together is a mutual benefits both parties. Community based policing doesn’t necessarily mean that the Police necessarily have to answer to the public, but rather work with the public in order to make a better service. Most agency’s work on a hierarchy system, and everyone is held accountable for their actions by higher authorities.

Criminal justice plays a big part in America 's history from drug cartels to murder cases. But several things have changed throughout times, as politics change through times so do laws. The early American Experience talks about the frontier, policing America 's earliest cities, and the prohibition era. In the last half of the twentieth century America quickly changed this changed the legal and social environment. Later on in the 1960s evidence- based policing became popular to help solve crimes faster.

Current scholars often cite a fourth era of policing since the events of 911. This is known as the Homeland Security Era. Make a case either for or against the naming the Fourth Era Homeland Security. Use current research or events to establish your opinion.

Modern Day Policing And Society: Where Are We Headed? Maggie Green Edward Spangler CRJ-100 1/28/2018 Modern day policing has been formed by three different policing eras. The three eras include the Political, Reform, and Community Eras.

Problem solving is used to reduce offending in a community. It believes that crimes are caused by existing social conditions. It involves both law enforcement and the community in ways to reduce or prevent crime (i.e., neighborhood watch). The community is a very important aspect of this operational strategy. Departments need to do more to develop solutions with a partnership of the community.

The officers answered in such a way that they contradicted themselves when it came to abuse of power. They tended to say that few officers partook in such conduct and that it wasn’t uncommon for officers to turn a blind eye to any misconduct that did occur. The officers thought that the education and training they received was sufficient for keeping any unwanted actions at bay. And finally, the officers believed that switching from a militarized policing style to one that is more community based has lowered the chances of committing such acts; although, this has yet to be confirmed by any statistical backing. The officers are, in fact, more likely to commit another deviant act as a direct result of the sanctions imposed (Weisburd, Greenspan, Hamilton, Williams, and Bryant 2000).

The topic for this research proposal project is on community policing, and the factors that are involved in determining if relationships between law enforcement and citizens in these neighborhoods are strained. In order to be successful, community policing must be built on trust, as both civilians and law enforcement must work hand in hand to protect their communities. If there is a lack of trust, then these programs becomes broken, and can therefore lead to other violence and criminal acts. This research proposal project will focus on minority based communities and citizens, where the majority of the citizens are either African American or Hispanic.

There are significant dynamics in the traits and trends of political and eras of policing. With heightened need to secure citizens from law offenders, those who receive police training acquire skills and expertise from the various academies that are viewed as significantly related to their work within the work environment. I opine that community policing, an aspect of police networks creates a workable partnership between the members of the community and police unit as a means of moderate the inherent fear in the people in the event of criminal activities. Conventional policing and community policing are variant in many aspects.

One of the main advantages to community policing is that it can reduces the fear in the community. To increase police presence in many neighborhoods can make residents feel more secure (Strehlow,2017). This can also help establish trust within the community, leading to improve police and community relationships. For instance, they could work together if there was ever a time when the police needed the public to help since there is a trust between them. Another advantage is that the community policing allows the community to come up with solutions that fit within their own neighborhoods.