Growing up around social media and movies that contrast stereotypes frequently, it has become almost natural to presume a way about a group or individual without knowing one’s identity. Before interacting with those who attended a private school, my mind was entrenched to the assurance that those students were wealthy, preppy, and superior who wore the same uniform everyday, resembling everyone else. From kindergarten till seventh grade, I attend a small charter school called Sherman Thomas where uniforms were enforced. Being mistaken as a private school majority of the time, outsiders viewed me differently. Mrs. Napier, the principle felt as if all students wore the same attire, no judgement towards the less fortunate would take place. With …show more content…
These stereotypes and misconceptions have evolved overtime for a reason. There is an exaggerated truth about private school kids. The first private schools were established by Roman Catholic churches. These schools were initially built before public school, but only allow specific children to attend. Like today, these schools are for those parents who want a better education for their children. Private schools have had and still have more principles regarding behavior and even attire for the students. The environment at a small disciplined school contrast to a less strict public school, which is typically why many have the assumption all students at private schools are satisfactory with no distractions. Movies are a clear example that has painted a perfect of how these individuals act, dress and who they surround themselves with. Take the movies Princess Diaries, the main character, Mia Thermopolis attends a private school and her grandmother is the queen of England. Mia lives a fabulous life her her high classed home with the only worry of becoming the next perfect princess. Many believe all who attend a private school are wealthy due to the expensive cost per year, whereas at a public school education is free. Since outsiders see these students as offly wealthy, who are given everything and more, being stuck up is yet another stereotype. The movie legally blonde enhances this particular stereotype, when Vivian …show more content…
Despite the contrasting environment, private school students are no different than public school students. In an online manifesto, If You Send Your Kid to Private school you are bad, Allison Benedikt, an executive editor states, “But many others go private for religious reasons, or because their kids have behavioral or learning issues, or simply because the public school in their district is not so hot”.This proves that private schools are not filled with angels, but rather kids who have behavioral issues and need that extra help. In senior writer and editor John S Kiernan’s, online article, Private Schools vs. Public Schools - Experts Weigh In, Patrick J. Wolf, Ph.D, proclaims, “Private schools also are becoming more diverse, as their enrollments increasingly include minority and low-income students”. Similar to a public school, private schooling have their low, medium and upper class students. Many have a common assumption that students are privates are academically more advanced than regular school. In an online article titled, Private Versus Public, written by the GreatSchools Staff, a clear understanding is provided about the different curriculum taught when they state, “This freedom to design their own curriculum or avoid standardized tests can result in higher standards for students — or
Teachers explain and expand on the textbook, but never analyze it. In an affluent professional school students have a creative activity done independently. Kids have more control to finishing an assignment before moving to another subject compared to the working class. In an executive elite school focused on analyzation. Students
For example, the award ceremonies that took place were seen as simply events that celebrated only preps and not anyone else. After all, many non-preps like the example of a student named Wendy, thought that they deserved an award because of their social and economic situations and how they have to live through and experience hardship. A major problem with the hierarchy and school was the “invisibility” that surrounded these students. Both the students and school personnel did not pay much mind to this group, more dismissing them as just being “there”. As Bettie argues, “at the bottom of the peer hierarchy among white students, the smokers overtly rejected schooling and middle-class norms by association” (2002:102).
In the TV show Freaks and Geeks, many stereotypes are presented through the use of media elements. The filmmakers used the media elements of setting and characters to show the different stereotypes in Freaks and Geeks. The media element setting is used to show stereotypes of the stereotypical high school environment using tools like time and place. Setting displays the stereotype that all high schools have certain groups assigned to their own tables. In the case of the TV show Freaks and Geeks, the geeks sit at one table and the jocks sit at another.
Similarly, educational policies of non-governmental agencies do not always benefit students in need. Oftentimes an institution receives money, starts working, and begins teaching children. However, as soon as the photos are taken and necessary inspections are passed both funds and a person responsible for them disappear (Boo 171). In contrast to public schools, private ones
So, knowing all the negative results that come from getting an education in the terrible conditions of these schools, many families who have a low socio- economic status try to avoid it all together. However, these families’ resources are scarce and their options are quite few. They could try paying for a private school, which can be very costly, or take their chances in
For example, a company may pay less money for an uneducated teacher rather than lose profit and spend more on a higher quality teacher. Most teachers in the public school system teach because teaching is their passion therefore, they want to teach, whereas in a private system the teacher may be there just for the money. Less government regulation in private schools can potentially make it harder for the government to enforce standardized testing and regulations such as requiring a certain number of school days and requirements to teach. Not having politicians involved also silences voices when it comes to the school system and allows for large companies to make large
Yet, despite these odds, public high schools continue to perform very poorly on standardized knowledge tests. But with the current setup of
School Dress codes do not allow students to completely express their individuality. Schools want students to be able to think for themselves and create a sense of who they are, but it is not easy when they are forced to abide by rules that take away from from that. It should be a place of expressing ourselves freely in a learning environment without having to worry about what we wear as an interfering issue. The fact that the school system cares more about the student dress code than their education is an issue in itself. Schools should promote dress code individuality because of religious aspects, mental health, and human experience.
Another reason people should go to public schools, because of their cost. It is free for a child to attend a public school, but lack of funding always comes from fundraisers, donations, and events. Some events
I was amazed to read that in the affluent school, some of the children mention they will rather not be rich. Rich meant that they could not work and they will rather work since they liked working. In the executive school, I was bothered by the comment that a teacher stated. A teacher associated low-income children with discipline problems. I think that teacher generalized an observation he
According to the experience of my parents and older relatives, they had a clear distinction between the word public and private universities. They always studied in the public universities since these universities were affordable and they were supposed to be funded by the government. If we compare the concept of public and private universities of both the era we can find a huge difference between these two concepts now. Now a days public universities are charging same as the private universities. Education is not even affordable by most of the citizens of America since their yearly income is nearly equal to a semester fee of a university.
In addition, there is only one class for a particular grade; there is no need to change class. The bells only rings for recess and special need students are not separated from other students. There is no school bus. However, in America some private school’s students wear uniform; and public school’s student wear regular clothes.
Many high schools have implemented dress codes that set rules for what students can and cannot wear while on school premises, and yet many people disagree with these policies. Though arguments can be made for either side, a dress code can have a very positive outcome for all parties involved. A fixed dress code promotes professionalism in a learning environment, and contrary to popular belief, it does not limit a student’s freedom of expression. Last but not least it encourages equality and acceptance among their peers. A dress code can be reasonable if used in proper situations that require certain attires.
As I have heard from a friend here in America, US public schools are no less than quality but excel in private
A child is struggling to learn at his/ school. He is more of a visual learner, like learning with pictures and shapes in front of him. His school, however, does not have the power and funding to do such things for him, which leaves him struggling and get bad grades. Now, why does he have to struggle in a school system which can’t even support his learning style?