Pros And Cons Of Lowering The Voting Age From 18 To 16

Letting a new age group vote will help show the diversity that is among them. In the article Shin writes about how “some opponents said that young people barely old enough to drive a car don’t have enough perspective to vote.” This argument is valid because it is true that many young voters don’t have the experience to vote. It can still be undone by the fact that only informed individuals are willing to vote at such a young age. This is done through the fact that many young voters were prompted by this new right, to go out and seek the information needed to be well informed

Nowadays, the young generations are not aware of how important it is to go out to a poll and vote. Without the votes, voter turnout will continue to decline. The citizens should be more aware of what is going on, fight for their beliefs and issues, and make a

Illinois should lower the drinking age to 18 is probably something you hear every college aged kid that gets caught with alcohol and get stuck expensive drinking ticket. Parents will say that their kids should never drink at all, or at least uptight ones will but most parents could agree with the police that issue the tickets as a punishment. Police will state that state with strict rules of the law that no one should even be in possession of alcohol because that means that purchased illegally or had a person that could legally buy it for them which is always a problem with the restriction of a substance. This interconnected actors and situations lay that IAD framework that this paper will be analyzed; both sides of the issue will be brought up and examined with an introduction of who the actors on each side of the issue are, identify their preferences, discuss the rules-in-use (both formal and informal, laws and norms), discuss the incentives those rules are

Meanwhile in the Unites States, the government allows its citizens to show up to the voting ballot if they so wish. Many times, the voters feel uneducated and incompetent to choose their representative. Personally, as a young adult, I’m not much familiar with politics and elections. Therefore, ignorance hinders voting sometimes especially among the young people. On the other hand, those people who have seen elections all their lives and have gained knowledge on all topics immediately show up to cast their vote.

16 to 17 year olds know less informed decisions than voters in their 20’s. Frontal lobes of adolescents may not be fully developed, their judgement may not be as mature as it will be when they are older. I think an amendment should be able added to the constitution that would change the minimum voting age from 18 to 16. 15 to 17 year olds performed better than 24 to 25 year olds on a variety of political questions. Thirty seven percent of 15 to 17 year olds got the question correct, while twenty eight percent of 24 to 25 year olds got it

Imagine being called to fight, kill and even die for your country, on the other hand not being allowed to vote. Throughout most of American history, 18-year-olds fought in our wars, nevertheless, had to be 21 to vote. Granted that changed in 1971 when President Nixon certified the 26th Amendment, lowering the voting age to 18. The words of President Nixon, "The reason I believe that your generation, the 11 million new voters, will do so much for America at home is that you will infuse into this nation some idealism, some courage, some stamina, some high moral purpose, that this country always needs.” Voting arguably may be the most important civic opportunity given to citizens in the United States.

For example, if the electorate consists mainly of older voters, politicians will focus on the issues important to them at the expense of issues important exclusively to younger people. In conclusion, voting is an important part of being an active American citizen. It’s the one chance for each person to register their opinion about politics and how they believe the country should proceed. Statistics demonstrate a slight change in the number of voters can have a major impact on the outcomes of an election. When people consider the influence

Drinking Age The drinking age should be eighteen instead of twenty-one. When you are eighteen years old, you are legally considered an adult. If you are considered an adult then you should be allowed to drink alcoholic products. Age does not define maturity and the eighteen to twenty year old age group should not have prejudice against them that makes them feel categorized into a particular group.

These are heavy obligations with their own challenges that adults have no problem taking on, so why shouldn’t the younger citizens that are undertaking these responsibilities be able to vote? If they are thought to be responsible enough

Every 15 minutes a teenager will die due to drunk driving. In the world, on average, 96 teens will die every day. The number of deaths would increase if the drinking age was lowered. The drinking age should not be changed. The age should stay the same.

Now they teach politics in schools so that the students can understand how politics work. We may never know, those younger votes can make a difference in society. Younger children deserve to vote too. They understand politics because they teach in their schools now. They age to vote should be sixteen and above.

Voting is a big part of our country, but those who usually tend to vote are the ones granted to vote, which are the young majority of people. I strongly feel that 16 and 17-year-olds should be granted the right to vote, especially because it will prepare them for maturity. In the article, Takoma Park 16-year-old savors his history making moment at the polls, author, Annys Shin, explains that if we get into the habit of teaching young teenagers about voting, they will become more engaged. If we already are educated about voting in school, why aren’t 16 and

We need votes from people that understand everything about the election. There is no contest in voting ranks with other countries. I feel there is no trust in letting 16 year olds vote when they have no interest or knowledge to make a smart

Yet, to avoid this, we can teach them how not to be swayed at school. According to the Electoral Reform Society, they support young citizens at the age of 16 in how to vote and what decision making they should do. If teenagers get the support from authorized adults who can lead young adults to the right path through society, I believe we can trust their opinions. The Fulcrum exclaims that the Ontario Government already recognizes that 16 year olds can understand the issues and independent judges on them. From this, we can say that adults keep full eye on young adults and what kind of thinking they have towards politics so it is safe for teenagers to start voting.

If some citizens who are qualified to vote are denied the right to cast votes, it is considered as a severe abuse of political equality. The debate about the age of electoral majority has taken place for a long period; however, there has been moderately slight attention in the debate given to the exclusion of young people from the vote (Tremmel, 2015). Some of the critics of lowering the voting age to sixteen claim that the young people do not possess the capability and motivation of appropriately taking part in the elections. Some studies have shown that the turnout of the voters ages 18 years is relatively low, however, this cannot specifically attribute to the motivation to take part in the election (Wagner, Johann, & Kritzinger, 2012). This shows that this the issue of the age to the electoral majority is of significance and should be discussed.