Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

462 Words2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation also known as the, Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, was an earlier document between 1776-1777. That was approved over many months of debate and is known as the 1st constitution of the United States between the first thirteen colonies. It was then to be ratified by all the 13 states that took nearly a full 4 years to do so. The idea of this constitution was to give sovereignty of all 13 states while the federal government only received powers that the states recognized were given to the King and Parliament, similar almost to the British. The Articles were inarguably terrible and had very little positive outcomes, most consider it to reap no benefits whatsoever and caused many conflicts between the states. Many main drawbacks and problems for The Articles of Confederation were seen from the beginning. The strongest fault of the document was the national government had very little power, especially with the states. The central government could not even regulate how the states enforced or created their own rules causing them to run as their own mini-countries. The local government was overpowering the national government, and if the states didn’t cooperate then it would take unnecessary amounts of time to enact important decisions such as War and military drafts. This led the …show more content…

This countermeasure however backfired thus, gave the states more power than needed. The United States feared giving power to the central government as it could cause a fault in leadership. However, splitting the power led to 13 powerful colonies that did not agree with each other. Causing leaders unable to rule effectively. Not having a strong central government gave the country many limitations to

Open Document