Public Breastfeeding: Stop censoring motherhood!
Out of all of the decisions mothers have to make for their children, the choice to breastfeed is one of the most supported by medical organizations. The American Academy of Pediatricians released in their policy statement that “there are very few reasons not to breastfeed. Mothers make good healthy milk even if their diets are not full of nutritious foods” (“Breastfeeding and…”). While breastfeeding, also referred to as nursing is widely supported in many aspects of medicine and our government; that is not the case of doing so in public. There has been a growing debate within society on whether or not mothers should be allowed to nurse their children in public. This debate continues
…show more content…
Society has no right to tell women what they should wear or how they should dress. The Ontario Human Rights Commission says that as a breastfeeding mother “No one should prevent you from breastfeeding your child simply because you are in a public area.” They cannot ask you to put a cover on or interrupt and ask you to move (OHRC breastfeeding brochure). Self-expression is a human right that many use to back up how they act, dress and speak, so why can’t nursing mothers have this same right? When a mom chooses to breastfeed in public, she is not only feeding her child but also showing society that she is not ashamed of being a breast feeding mother. She is capitalizing on her right to dress how she pleases, act as she pleases and express herself as she …show more content…
Those who are against women who feed in public argue that it is indecent exposure. An anonymous user on debate.org voted no when the question “should women breastfeed in public was brought up. “I agree that breastfeeding is natural, however it is indecent exposure. A woman walking around with an exposed chest is not something parents want their children to be exposed to, placing a baby in the equation does not change the fact that the woman is still exposing herself to the public” (debate.org). This would be a great point in the argument, if the government did not exempt breastfeeding women from this law. In America, West Virginia and Idaho are the only states that do not protect nursing mothers against the indecent exposure law, and Wyoming, South Dakota, and Michigan stop their protection of breastfeeding mothers at the public indecency law (Nursing Freedom). This would be the only way for society to stop women from nursing in public, but by women being protected by this law anyone who tries to stop them can be convicted of
Why Designer Babies Should Not Be a Thing Name: Stephany Batista Topic: Why designer babies should not be a thing. General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: By the end of the speech, the audience will understand the down side of designer babies and should see why designer babies should not be a thing. Introduction Attention Getter:
Why is taking off work to give birth a shame in the work place? It is those every babies that will become the future of America. Taking work leave should not be frown upon, it should be applauded. Senator Kristen Gillibrand, in her editorial explains why the US should adopt the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act (FAMILY Act). First, Gillibrand incorporates progressive diction so the act comes across as a positive change.
In The Guide “Best Practice Guide from Implementation of Creating Breastfeeding Friendly Space by Jeff Spitz, Sharon Marshall-Taylor, Natalie Felida an entire page was dedicated to describe the problem that led to the need of The Breastfeeding and Policy Intern: “The Brooklyn Breastfeeding Empowerment Zone (BFEZ) is a community-based initiative that addresses the unique structural and cultural barriers which impact breastfeeding rates in Bedford Stuyvesant and Brownsville. The goal of the Brooklyn Breastfeeding Empowerment Zone is to develop a sustainable, replicable, community-based model in North/Central Brooklyn where breastfeeding is the norm and is seen as the default choice for families”. It does so by promoting and empowering community
In the Chicago Tribune, August 1, 2000, Darryl E. Owens (Knight Ridder) writes about a birthing practice used for thousands of years that has made a renewed entrance into American Healthcare entitled, “Childbirth ‘Doulas’ Take Root” (Owens, 2000). I found this article to be very interesting as I am studying to enter nursing school, and I have a desire to work as a nurse in women’s health, especially obstetrics. This article describes a different approach to preparing and supporting expecting families before, during and immediately after childbirth. The author, Darryl E. Owens is an editorial writer specializing in criminal justice, race relations, and social services for the Chicago Tribune, and has also featured articles in Teen Magazine.
Having somebody tell a person they can’t wear something or getting called out of class to go change because their outfit is inappropriate really makes them feel worthless and degraded. Today in our school districts, girls are being told that they can’t wear leggings or track shorts because it’s distracting to the boys. Teachers and adults are basically telling girl students that they are the reason the boys act the way they do to them and that boys aren’t the problem. In the article, the author wrote about her friend and how they were required to wear revealing clothes to work so her boss and the other men colleagues could have something nice to look at. It’s amazing that even in the work area women are still being policed and sexualized for what they wear.
Pregnancy and birth for the modern Ojibwe woman differs very little from current American practices. Both AN and her brother were born in a hospital, their mother received prenatal care, and both were formula fed. When asked about breastfeeding views patient was unsure if she would want to breastfeed when she has children as her mother didn’t and she feels that it would be very embarrassing to breastfeed in public. AN states that Ojibwe women are very modest and do not feel comfortable being exposed in public
In “Stop Telling Women What to Wear,” Pamela Divinsky compares the right of autonomy concerning one’s clothing choices to the dress-codes and regulations instilled by schools, workplaces, and the government, focusing on the controversy surrounding what women can and cannot wear. Divinsky uses this to draw attention to these institutions’ obsession with women’s appearances, and the fact that lawmakers and boards should have no say in the matter, referencing arbitrary dress codes, and most notably, the injudicious and unmindful passing of Bill 62. She laces her article with a subtle tone of scorn towards those who are “distressed” by the niqab, reprimanding their unjustified “discomfort” and prompting them to “get over it,” awakening them to the reality that their petty and paternalistic legislation even further oppresses and profiles women, and endangers their agency and rights. Divinsky makes quick work of multiple anti-niqab arguments, offering simple and feasible solutions that would appease both sides, and describing their opposition with belittling words such as “discomfort” and “disturb,” likening their concerns to the trifling remarks of an old-timer who is bound by their outdated dogma. “For many, opposition to the niqab is harder to pinpoint,” she subtly ridicules, implying that their uneasiness is irrational and has no valid grounds, as they themselves do not really know why they are so opposed to it, but they “just are.”
Abortion Regulations In today’s society a woman’s private choice has never been so public. In the United States, abortion was illegal for most of the 20th century; however, in the 1960s, when the women’s rights movement began to grow, abortion was argued, by feminists, as a women’s control of her body (“Abortion.”). Whose choice is it now? Is it the governments’, the politician’s, the president’s?
Pro-Life Everyday people line up outside of abortion clinics protesting against it. But these people are only worried about saving the baby’s life for that moment. Five years later that baby that they saved from death could end up living on the street. If they want to save the child they should adopt it as well.
Yet there are people getting horrible treatments in court and public for breastfeeding. It has gotten to the point where breastfeeding was being regularly asked to stop in courts to give more child custody to the father, equal custody. (Which is not caring about the health
The Canadian Human Rights Act, as expected, does not condone discrimination relating to pregnancy. This is according to the Canadian Commission's official policy statement. Discrimination against pregnant women is considered to be a form of sex discrimination, since only women can become pregnant. Areas of discriminatory practices against pregnant women covered by this policy include: negative treatment, refusal to hire or promote, termination of employment, and harassment. Unfortunately, in Canada, like many other countries, many women who become pregnant are criticized when it comes to their place in society.
Breastfeeding in public some would say is “inappropriate” or “ distracting”. In reality all it is a mother feeding her baby to only feed and not purposely show people her breast. Some mothers feel the need to have to cover up with a blanket or go to the bathroom just so she will not have to worry about being looked at and judged. Women who breastfeed in public but will cover up either want to, or are covering up because what they will hear from people.
Breastfeeding is a natural occurrence and I think that because it is a natural process women can do it in public, but I think that they should cover themselves. I know that when I go out to eat or go see a movie that I don’t want to see what a mother is doing to feed her child. Breastfeeding is such an intimate experience between a mother and child that I wouldn’t want anyone in public to see. Breasts should be used for their natural intentions and that’s it, breasts don’t need to be shown all over and people don’t need gawk over something on a woman’s
The same study showed mothers who gave birth by cesarean sections were less responsive to their own babies cry. This does not mean the mothers loved their child any less, they were just missing the hormonal reactions that come with childbirth and breastfeeding. This gives an explanation to why my little brother is a pain in the butt, by not being born in a natural birth, we did not get the loving connection with his mother and has been missing that all of his life. Though he was breastfeed, he always preferred his father over his
You may be glad to know that millions of women have become breastfeeding moms and held down their regular job. Employers are required by law not to discriminate against breastfeeding moms. In fact, they may also be required to