Public Policy Analysis Of Fossil Fuels

My general overview of this article is the methods used to obtain fossil fuels is hurting people and nature all around the world. People are beginning to come to a realization about how fracking is harming the world. However, people in cities like “Buffalo, New York, Pennsylvania, and the author’s hometown

On the same hand, it was discovered that “most of the nation’s energy efficient provinces are located along the coast of southeast China, while most of its energy inefficient provinces are located in the hinterland that is rich in coal resources and depends heavily on coal consumption” (Pan, Zhang, and Zhang, 2012), proving that fossil fuels are a direct detriment to energy

Hart questions whether, “extracting and using more fossil fuels for the sake of economic gain [is] in our best interest- or that of the future generations?” (Hart, 28). The negative effects of burning fossil fuel add up to create an overall warmer climate impacting not only this generation’s current environment, but also the generations to come. This makes the reader question whether the offshore oil drilling is really worth the environmental impact on climates for not only them but future generations as

Throughout the centuries, humans have been attempting to find a way to power homes, cars, and other luxuries in the most efficient way possible. Coal and oil were two major sources that begin being exploited during the industrial revolution. Both have caused great controversy over the years from lawsuits to strikes. A new way to drill oil, hydraulic fracturing, was discovered and was an efficient means of drilling until its effects became prevalent. Also, when coal began to run out, a new method called mountaintop removal took hold, but continues to damage the earth.

In the following article, the author, George Will, stresses that here in America cutting back on coal will not change the burning of coal around the world such as China, Russia, India, and other countries. For instance, China had signed a 60 billion dollar contract to supply power plants with Australian coal. The Times says that in China, their ships hauled about 690 million tons of thermal coal this year; up from 385 million in 2001 and 150 million tons in 2009. He addresses to counterargument by including a spokesman in the Sierra club who mentions that mining is "everything we 've accomplished, ' ' but environmentalists in America protested that mining shall also export global warming, if continues. Because of China 's enormous coal

Another benefit from switching to clean-burning natural gas is a decrease in pollutants in the air, which will decrease airborne illnesses and premature deaths. He discusses the impact of energy independence for countries that rely on insecure regions for their energy needs. For example, the U.S. will rely less on the Middle East, Europe will rely less on Russia and India will rely less on Iran. By presenting fracking as the answer to the world’s problems, Pierce counters the arguments of critics who cite the environmental problems of fracking. His paper is one-sided because he leaves out the other side of the debate by ignoring any negative aspects of fracking.

Have you ever wondered what our children, and grandchildren’s lives will be like? We Screwed Up; A Letter of Apology to my Granddaughter (Ward, 2012) is a letter written by Chip Ward to his four year old granddaughter and her possible unborn siblings. He speaks clearly about the devastation that past generations have caused to the planet we all call home, although he fails to provide any evidence concerning what he claims, as well as majorly lacks appreciation for the organizations already working towards a better tomorrow. Chip Ward begins his letter with an apology to his granddaughter and her siblings for using up all of the oil. He claims that, “We are all gas-hogs, plain and simple” (Ward, 2012), in regards to his generation and those

After corporate titans like Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan had changed the economic landscape in America, new giants followed their footsteps, this time focusing more on the consumer. Henry Ford emerged as one of the leaders of this new consumer-focused economy due to his Model T car that would prove affordable for the average American. His introduction of the assembly line changed production forever, bolstering the consumer fever. Just like Ford’s assembly line, perhaps the next big overhaul of factories is the use of alternative energy. A great adaptation of Ford’s success would to be providing affordable alternatives to fossil fuels both for large corporations and the average consumer.

Moreover, on page 46, Gould and Lewis indicate that modern societies such as the U.S conscientiously take risks; and most of the time governments know the hazards and implications. However, American citizens should be making their personal decisions based on the Ecological Modernization Theory, which implies that capitalism is flexible and, that we can continue enjoying the newest technological commodities and at the same time be eco-friendly. In addition the market should our best support, not the government, according to this theory. Moreover, some governments, including our actual president support fracking, consider that through this process, it can be extracted natural gas and

They are two crucial aspects to the topic of energy, but are not included by the UN. A determinant reason that millions of people across the globe have to resort to biomass to cook is that the cost associated with modern energy makes it less accessible (Birol, p.1). This unfortunate situation is due to many reasons. A key reason is that many of the resources required to install energy plants are disproportionally controlled by a few geopolitical actors. This causes large fluctuations on the commodity prices all over the globe, making not only modern energy, but also other basic human development targets, such as shelters and transportations less attainable (Regnier, p.2).

government has demonstrated the effectiveness of an egalitarian system through policies that advocate equity. One example of this is Affordable Care Act (ACA) enacted by President Obama on March 23, 2010. The Affordable Care Act does what it says; it makes healthcare affordable for low-income citizens. Not only does it give low-income citizens the opportunity to purchase health care that would otherwise only be affordable to the upper-class, but it also provides positive secondary long-term effects. The article It Easy for Obamacare Critics to Overlook the Merits of Medicaid Expansion explains that “children whose eligibility [for medicaid] increased were more likely to go to college, earn higher wages and pay more taxes by the time they were 28 years old.”

In other words, it costs less to solve the problem than manage it. It is efficient to spend a lot of money on a few people than it is to spend a little money on a lot of people. The huge part of the decision should be bottom-lined oriented, but it should also be based on the outcomes of the solution. If the program betters individuals to be productive citizens it would benefit the economy and society in the long

In addition, when subsidizing necessity goods and services such as education, the effects of this subsidy will also be noticeable in the long term (Schultz, 2001). Schultz (2001) analyzes a program where education is subsidized for poor families in Mexico. His analysis shows that subsidies stimulate poor children to study, which in the long term lead to better jobs. When those poor children are given the ability to get educated well and find a good job, they will also have the ability to earn a higher salary (Schultz, 2001). The individual can spend this money on goods which will increase his or her personal wealth but also increase production in industries.

The opposition to the abolition of welfare may say that welfare programs do in fact reduce the poverty levels in America. While it is true that poverty is reduced by almost

Fossil fuels  Fossil fuels are NOT a renewable energy resource it will finish up one day As once we 've burned them all, there isn 't any more, and our consumption of fossil fuels has nearly doubled every 20 years since 1900. This is a particular problem for Oil, because we also use it to make plastics and many other products  Coal, Oil and Gas are called "fossil fuels" because they have been formed from the fossilized remains of prehistoric plants and animals. 