This article argues about the rhetorical meaning around charitable cookbooks. It’s mainly discusses the cookbooks’ connection with maternal pacifist politics. The author Isaac West finds that most of the researches in communication ignore the rhetoric in cookbooks therefore she appeal the public to pay attention on rhetoric in everyday life. West begins with analyzing the essentialism critiques against maternal pacifist politics and cooking. She claims, “As with cooking, though, this rhetorical strategy has been critiqued for its essentialist implications” (West, 2007, p. 362). Some feminist believe that cooking, as a practice of maternal pacifist politics, is constraining women to act into stereotype against their freewill. To argue with that, West points out that “feminist projects can become stultified and ineffective when they take certain identity categories out of the …show more content…
Next, West explain to us that the “conflict between a mother's domestic duties and her duty to protect the world's children through her activism” (2007, p. 373). She politicizes the definition of motherhood in WSP from caring inside the family to the others in the whole world that outside their own family by analyzing the words and rhetoric in the cookbook. “Cooking” undoubtedly could be connecting to “family” therefore West illustrates that “the cookbooks can help a woman simultaneously satisfy her family's bunger and engage in activism” (2007, p. 371). To me, what at stake in this article is the way West is able to connect charitable cookbooks with maternal pacifist politics in the first place. Moreover, we’ve been always focus on criticize the stereotype on women while her unique method help me realize that we should never force people to hide their identity, even the identity is matching the stereotype of
In the short story, the author expresses gender roles by relating to circumstances that have happened in the kitchen. Based on the author’s personal experiences, he predicts that women have a natural instinct on
The one thing that any author must do when writing any sort of essay is to make it comprehensible to the reader. In order to achieve this, the author must utilize anything to get their point across or else the writing would be futile. In Turkeys in the Kitchen , Dave Barry gives his own personal stories about his Thanksgiving and how he feels that men aren’t as useful as women in the terms of the culinary arts (kitchen), Barry’s flippant tone and his use of rhetorical devices such as similes and irony bring forth a light hearted explanation of stereotypes between men and women as well as describing how men are useless in the kitchen. The uses of similes throughout the essay give purpose by showing how men are useless.
A Rhetorical Analysis of “Don’t Blame the Eater” by David Zinczenko Sara, a single mother of two kids, is driving home from a grueling day of work. She’s worked overtime all week and has some tightness in her back. Upon looking at the clock on the dashboard of her 1996 Volkswagen, she realizes that it is way too late to go home and cook a nice dinner for her two children. She turns into the nearest McDonalds, orders some chicken nuggets, and brings dinner home. Can you blame a mother who just wanted her kids to eat?
In her essay, “The Importance of Work,” from The Feminine Mystique published in 1963, Betty Friedan confronts American women’s search for identity. Throughout the novel, Betty Friedan breaks new ground, concocting the idea that women can discover personal fulfillment by straying away from their original roles. Friedan ponders on the idea that The Feminine Mystique is the cause for a vast majority of women during that time period to feel confined by their occupations around the house; therefore, restricting them from discovering who they are as women. Friedan’s novel is well known for creating a different kind of feminism and rousing various women across the nation.
Outdated stereotypes create forced expectations and affect people for the worst. This is a common theme between “Turkeys in the Kitchen” by Dave Barry and “The Myth of the Latin Woman: I Just Met a Girl Named Maria” by Judith Ortiz Cofer. These works deal with stereotypes of gender and ethnicity, as well as how they are interpreted on the receiving end. Turkeys in the Kitchen deals with gender through anecdotes about cooking, and how the stereotypes of men and women in the kitchen persist post-women’s-liberation. “The Myth of the Latin Woman” deals with Puerto Rican stereotypes through anecdotes about how she is treated differently as a woman for her ethnicity, and how she is prematurely judged by her Puerto Rican behavior and ethnicity.
New recipes for hibachi, fondue, quiche, crepes and the most recent addition salsas, were added to her mother’s recipe box. These foods indicate how far she has come from the traditions of her southern hometown. Additionally, she describes how cooking isn’t solely controlled by women but to men as well in the 21st century. The chapter provides a stark between the conventional housewife and the new aged husband who shares the responsibility of cooking. The starts the comparison by describing the image of her mother waiting for her father to come home from work every day.
Madeleine Thien’s “Simple Recipes” is not mainly about the father cooking food and his treatment towards his son, instead, the author uses food to symbolize the struggles her immigrated family experienced in Canada. While it is possible to only look at the narratives that food symbolizes, the idea is fully expressed when the father is compared with the food. The theme of food and the recipes are able to convey the overall troubles the narrator’s family encountered. Although, food is usually a fulfilling necessity in life, however, Thien uses food to illustrate the struggle, tensions, and downfall of the family. Yet, each food does represent different themes, but the food, fish, is the most intriguing because of the different environment
Choi then quotes the Director of food studies at New York University, providing relevancy and authenticity to her work. The statement also establishes a link between what we eat and how it connects to particular memories and places in our minds. Moving on, the article is divided into six different subheadings. Each subheading explains the origin of indigenous food in different countries and what that denotes particular culture. Broadly speaking, food is necessary for survival, signifies status denotes pleasure, brings communities together and is essential for humanity.
Patience Agbabi’s poem ‘Eat Me’ and Frances Leviston’s ‘I resolve to live chastely’ both explore ideas of pleasure, with particular regard to the experiences of women and the constrictions of masculine society on female pleasure, whether derived from sexual contact, eating, or interaction with the world. Both poets deal with the rigid roles their female speakers are forced to inhabit, implying that they are trapped by condemnation and constriction. Moreover, both poets use food as a mechanism to explore female pleasure, perhaps alluding to eating disorders and their disproportionate impact on women. Both poems deal with how women are forced into rigid roles and standards for societal and masculine pleasure. In ‘Eat Me’, the speaker is forced by her abusive male partner into a submissive role as he overfeeds her for ‘his pleasure’, rather than hers.
Judith Butler’s Gender Troubles emphasizes gender as the constant repetition of non-existent ideals to uphold a masculine-dominant culture. Likewise, “Body Politics” highlights this belief within the overtly feminine qualities of city women. As a whole, the poem contrasts idealized feminine “city women” with a “real woman” who possesses both feminine and masculine qualities. The mother figure challenges both the gender binary and the patriarchal order by rejecting the feminine gender norms of the society. This feminist reading of the poem makes many valuable and probable claims, however the feminist approach contains some weaknesses.
The poem, “Beans, An Apologia for Not Loving to Cook,” is very cultural, political, and personal. It is a memory of the author, Judith Ortiz, that she is telling her daughter, Tanya. She shared in her poem that she learned to resent cooking because the women of her life, like her mother and grandmother, who chose cooking, among other things, over spending time with her. Women not only tended to the men of the household, but also to the gossip told in the kitchen. Judith was expected to do the same one day as well, but decided she wouldn’t follow in their foot steps.
Many descriptive words are used throughout the essay “Family Counterculture” by Ellen Goodman, to explain how hard it is to raise children. “Mothers and fathers are expected to screen virtually every aspect of their children’s lives.” This is one of the ways she defends the point that parenting has changed and has gotten harder. Even though parenting has changed “all you need to join is a child.”
When the argument shifts its setting by moving from the bedroom to the kitchen, Carver’s use of symbolism adds intensity to the story. Too busy with their selfishness, “In the scuffle they knocked down a flowerpot that hung behind the stove” (329). Neither parent stopped to see the broken pot, nor did any of them break focus on their fight with the child. The kitchen is usually a place where a family comes together, but here they were breaking apart at the seams.
During the 1890’s until today, the roles of women and their rights have severely changed. They have been inferior, submissive, and trapped by their marriage. Women have slowly evolved into individuals that have rights and can represent “feminine individuality”. The fact that they be intended to be house-caring women has changed.
A woman’s concern with the material causes them to be consumed with the superficial and distracts them from meaningful activity. The philosopher further expounds on this belief stating “stupidity in the kitchen; woman as cook, (Nietzsche, 228).” Women cannot even comprehend what it means to cook and yet still demands to cook for the family. In the event that ladies were as smart as they claim to be, they would have aced the craft of cooking and would have gained from it. But instead, women are still misunderstanding the means of