Roe V. Wade Argumentative Analysis

To me Abortion is simply murder. The killing of an innocent human being is wrong, even if that human being has yet to be born. Unborn babies are considered human beings by the US government. The federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which was enacted "to protect unborn children from assault and murder," states that under federal law, anybody intentionally killing or attempting to kill an unborn child should “be punished...

“it's a woman’s right to control her own destiny, to be able to make choices without the Big Brother state telling her what she and cannot do” (Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg). Women have fought for their entire lives for equal rights which for some apparent reasons have not been acknowledged. Roe vs. Wade had changed the outlook on the United States and on a woman’s rights to her own body. Roe vs. Wade goes back to 1973 which was between a women who had an unplanned surgery in Texas who wanted to make abortions legal. Norma Leah McCorvey, better known as “Jane Roe” was the plaintiff in this case, after her case the U.S Supreme Court had ruled that state laws banning abortion are unconstitutional.

Roe v Wade is one of the most prominent rulings to be handed down by the United States Supreme Court in the twentieth century. This case effectively legalised abortion nationwide, establishing that the termination of a pregnancy is protected by the constitutional right to privacy. The plaintiff, Jane Roe, sought to nullify a Texas statute declaring that the termination of pregnancy is an indictable offence. Notwithstanding the sizeable precedent set by Roe v Wade, abortion continues to be one of the most highly contested issues within the political discourse. This paper will analyse the legal, social and political impact that Roe v Wade has had on America since it was handed down in 1973.

Acknowledging bodily autonomy, its massive importance, and including women’s rights in the conversation on a national level is something that came about from this case and can never be undone, despite the since overturning of Roe. Legally protecting bodily autonomy ensured not just a comfortable feeling among American citizens, women particularly, but their legitimate ability to live freely without fear of government

Roe v. Wade not only set the ball rolling, but in reality reformed tough laws on a woman’s rights to have a safe abortion. As stated by CNN, abortion has been morphed into something more attainable to women who need it across the board, “The court held that a woman’s right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman a right to abortion during the entirety of the

1. Introduction Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the United States, has been a hotly contested issue since it was decided in 1973. While the decision was celebrated by advocates of women's rights as a victory for reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy, opponents of the decision have consistently pushed for its reversal. With the appointment of conservative justices to the Supreme Court in recent years, the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade has become a very real and pressing concern for women's rights advocates. This paper seeks to explore the potential impact of overturning Roe v. Wade on women's constitutional rights, particularly regarding reproductive freedom and healthcare access.

During the early 1800’s each state had the right to choose if abortion was legal or illegal. Most states made abortion illegal. Then In 1873 the Comstock Laws, created by Anthony Comstock, were passed. The Comstock Laws made it illegal to sell or distribute material that could be used as a contraceptive or abortion. The Comstock Laws were in place until The Roe v. Wade case of 1973.

Pro-Life side, one that feels that every life is a miracle and deserves the chance to live. This side stays on the course that all lives matter and deserve the chance to live. Pro-Life argues that taking the life of another is not accepted in any society, they argue the side effects of abortions, and they argue that adoption is an alternative to abortion as

The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.

On one side of the argument people believe that it 's wrong to kill an unborn child because all life is important regardless of if there born or not. Often the people who are “pro life” are also Christian or belong to another

Before Roe v. wade the number of deaths from illegal abortions was around 5000 and in the 50s and 60s the number of illegal abortions ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. These illegal abortions pose major health risks to the life of the woman including damage to the bladder, intestines as well as rupturing of the uterus. The choice to become a mother must be given to the woman most importantly because it’s her body, her health, and she will be taking on a great responsibility. A woman’s choice to choose abortion should not be restricted by anyone; there are multiple reasons why abortion will be the more sensible decision for the female.

A women’s right to personally decide what she wants done to her body in any medical situation has been something they have fought for many years. On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court set a precedent that gave women that right. Along with this right to decide came the legalization of medical abortions. This is a subject that affects all American citizens nowadays, both men and women, because of the recent protests such as the Women’s March on Washington. As citizens of the United States, men and women alike, we know the historical past of what women have fought for and what rights they have been given due to that fight.

On the other side, there is pro life, which basically states no one should ever abort. I firmly believe in pro life because no child deserves to be killed when it’s not his or her fault. Life begins the moment of conception; abortion is akin to murder as it is the act of taking human life. [1] It is the equivalent to murder and therefore, should not be permitted. The federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which was enacted "to protect

Most believe that a baby is still human; therefor it should have the right to live no matter what. Many people are uneducated on this subject and are very ignorant about their opinions. Since there are many different and strong opinions about abortion there are a lot of arguments on this topic. Despite what others believe, it is important for everyone to understand that abortion is unethical and

We can do so by arguing the case for the personhood of the child- even when they are just conceived. A baby is not only a human but also a person at conception. The argument in the past has been for the humanness of the baby only. However, it is past human identification now, for even scholarly professors accept the humanity of the fetus. For example, Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth, a professor at Harvard University Medical Center, states that “It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”