Steve Harmon's Monster In Walter Dean Myers Monster

In court, Ms. Petrocelli was talking about Steve being involved with the crime. The author wrote “‘The man who was to enter the store and check it out is sitting at the other table. His name is Steven Harmon.”’ (Myers 24). Steve probably being involved with the crime of helping the criminals with robbing the store shows that he is a bad person.

There was a lack of evidence to convict Steve guilty. Others have shown Steve's lack of guilt through their actions. On the night of the robbery and murder, there was no proven statement Steve was at the convenience store. He was caught up with the wrong people at the wrong time.

Murderers are evil, and it is imperative that the criminal justice system works against them, but it is just as important for them to work honestly and fair. Walter Dean Myers titled his book Monster. The book is about a sixteen-year-old boy, Steve Harmon, who is on trial for felony murder. A monster is what they called him, evil and malignant.

To start off, being in jail and court in this situation causes a lot of metal struggles. Steve knows he messed up and can lead to many years in jail, making him think deeply about his life. From Steve being through

Addison Lucas Mrs.A/Mr.G English 10 23 February 2023 Monster Monster is a novel written by Walter Myers,this story is based on Steve Harmon, a teenager who finds himself in a difficult situation as he is on trial for murder. While some people believe that Steve Harmon was not guilty, in reality, he was guilty because he had to be trained by O’Brien, he was at the drugstore during the crime, and he changed his story. The first reason why Steve is guilty is becasue he had to be trained by his defense attorney, Kathy O’brien. ”We’re going to play a little game.

Elianah Vazquez Mrs. Juhas 1/2 2-10-23 Good What is a good person? Steve Harmon is on trial for robbery, and murder.

Would you confess to a murder you didn't commit? Curious? Here's the ongoing case against Steven Avery. Steven Avery is a man from Manitowoc County, Wisconsin, who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault and attempted murder in 1985. He was sent to prison for 18 years before being exonerated in 2003 from DNA evidence.

He is writing in his journal. The book said, “I walked into a drugstore to look for some mints, and then I walked out…” (Myers 140). The quote explains that Steve is a monster because he said in his journal that he was in the store that day. He had told the jury that he wasn’t in the store that day.

In Steve's journal he wrote, “What did I do? I walked into a drugstore to look for

According to Bobo and what we’ve seen from Steve’s flashbacks he was supposed to be the lookout. This would mean that Lorelle Henry would’ve seen Steve in the store, and Steve seeing her. There was no mention of Steve throughout her entire testimony which leads to the possible conclusion that Steve was never there on that day, leading to him being not

What did I do? What did I do? Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I’m on trial for? I didn’t do anything!”(Myers, 115).

Steve is fighting with himself to figure out whether he is a monster. In Monster, Myers examines his idea of a monster through a court case. Firstly, Steve is fighting himself to try and find who he truly is. Disappointing, devastating, discriminating, the boy fights for his rights in front of the jury.

Steve Harmon, a young adult, was accused of felony murder. This shows that even a young kid who has been accused, although may or may not be proven guilty, is held to be a monster. Steve is terrified throughout the whole situation. He is completely inexperienced and does not feel he played a huge role in the actual robbery. He was pressured as the “lookout.

Steve Harmons actions depicted his characteristics and we can, therefore, conclude that Steve Harmon is a liar as he lied under oath. Steve was also a guilt-ridden man ashamed of his actions. People who disagree may claim that Steve was undoubtedly innocent as Lorelle Henry, a witness, declared that there were only 2 people, proven to be James King and Bobo Evans, inside the store who eventually murdered Mr.Nesbitt. This may be a strong argument because it shows that Steve was not in the drugstore and could be really innocent. On the contrary, however, Steve’s job was just supposed to be a lookout and ensure that the drugstore was clear of cops or anyone inside.

He depends on others to bring clarity to his mind, such as saying, “What did I do?”. After the session at court was finished, Steve was insecure about what Ms. O’Brien, his lawyer, thinks of him. He writes an entry about it: “Who was Steve Harmon? I wanted to open my shirt and tell her to look into my heart to see who I was, who the real Steve Harmon”(92). During the trial, Ms. O’Brien stays distant from him.