Strengths And Weaknesses Of Bill C-10 In Canada

IS THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT TOO LENIENT ON YOUTHS? The Youth Criminal Justice Act is the federal legislation that replaced the young offenders act in 2003. The Department of Justice defines the act by stating: It is the law that governs the Canadian youth justice systems. It applies to youth who are at least 12 years old but under the age of 18, who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. The three main topics in which I believe to be most crucial that relates to the Youth Criminal Justice Act include, how much time a youth must serve based on the degree of the crime especially when the crime committed was well planned out, the severity of the ruling based on a re-offence,

Bill C-51 does not protect Canadian citizens, rather it encroaches their innocence and rights. This legislation was created by the Conservative Party of Canada, and is soon to be called the Anti-Terrorism Act, 2015. It passed its 3rd reading May 6th, 2015 and its final vote in Senate June 9th, 2015; it is pending Royal Assent; and it is the first Federal legislation to enact S.33 of the Charter, the Notwithstanding Clause. This clause allows the government to enact a law (through traditional means) that conflicts with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for a period of 5 years, before it is subject to review. This proposed act outlines the laws that are to be put in place to protect Canada from a list of activities that supposedly attenuate

Bill C-51: A Critical Look Into the Proposed Bill as It Stands. Since the incidents of september 11 2001, most western countries instituted and updated its anti terrorism laws in order to increase national security and have tools that could counter any terrorist activities that could potentially harm a country's citizens at home or abroad. Canada being one of these countries had established Anti terrorism laws that had been sufficient enough to prevent any terrorist plots against canada in the years leading up to 2014. However after the recent events of the shooting at parliament hill, the conservative government has put forth another bill in order to draconian the anti terrorism laws.

and make sure other similar cases don’t happen in the future. Dealing with the wrongfully convicted is the first topic that is suggested within the commission, what is suggested is an independent review mechanism that would need to be put into place by the Attorney General. This means that this mechanism would be for the purpose of providing those who claim that they have been wrongfully convicted or those who have information on a case that had a potential wrongful conviction a place to approach with their concerns. The next top of suggests involves minorities and the criminal justice system, it is proposed by the commission that the Department of Attorney General publish a Policy on Race Relations to ensure that minorities are being better represented at all levels of the Canadian criminal justice system, it is also committed to the elimination of any inequalities of race within the system. An Alternative Penalty act is also proposed meaning that individuals will not be forced to serve time simply because they are financially unable to pay for a because of poverty.

Bill C-150, also known as the Omnibus Bill, or the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1968, was created by Pierre Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada at the time to amend different codes and acts to update them to make them more suited for the modern society (Prober 180). Through this bill, Trudeau amended many different laws on gambling, firearms, driving, abortion, homosexuality, and more. (Prober 180). Prime Minister Trudeau made a lot of positive changes and helped the advancements of issues through Bill C-150. For example, he penalized anyone who refused to take the breathalyzer test when asked by an officer and tightened gun laws.

The YCJA was said to solve the political need striking a balance between two contradicting objectives, protecting society from predatory youth, and the desire to avoid unnecessarily criminalizing minor offenders (Tanner, 2012). To accomplish these objectives the Act would follow the principles of accountability and proportionality, youth who commit serious or violent crimes will be punished as harshly as they should be, and minor offenses will be dealt with diversionary measures, such as EJMs (“Emergence of Juvenile Justice Systems”, March 15, 2017). For instance, EJMs that were commonly used included, police and Crown issued warnings, referrals to community programs, counselling, and educational programs, these measures are to avoid needlessly criminalizing youth who have only committed minor

1. A powerful blow to the head, neck or chest that causes the victim to fall to the ground unconscious is called a ‘king hit’. The victim may die due to the force of the blow received, or due to the impact of their skull coming into contact with the ground. Since 2000, as many as ninety Australians have been killed as a result of king hit attacks.

Canada is talked amongst other countries throughout the world as a safe, secure place to live. Majority of people do not know the heinous crimes that take place in Canada daily, especially whilst using a gun. Canada does not come close to the United States when comparing mass shootings, death by a gun, or homicides using a gun; although, the gun crimes in Canada are not improving. While Canada has more stringent gun laws than the united states, gun control in Canada should still be improved for citizen’s safety. Canada is often praised for having more efficient gun laws than the United States, but most people do not know that Canadian laws too, have much room for improvement.

The New Labour youth justice policy is embedded between the neo-liberal and neo-conservative ideology reference. These are manifested a backdrop of a social context which is utterly influenced by a culture of fear with regard to younger individuals. In particular these fears arise from incidences such as the James Bulger case in 1991. This resulted in government promise to be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime. The Crime and Disorder Act (1998) and the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act (1999) were established on the authority of political motivations to govern public services with cost effectiveness.

In this section of the book in criminal justice in Canada, it explains the new acts that have been added in over the years. It explains how the security certificates was introduced in 1988 in the immigration act. This strengthened further after 9/11 attacks in 2002, it gave the opportunity to give authorities a more quicker and efficient way to remove non-citizen terrorist’s suspects from Canada without having to charge the accused through the criminal justice system. This chapter also goes into further detail on how the Immigration Act has changed throughout the years.

The improvement of the rights of the Canadian Immigrants Canada, as one of the biggest immigration countries, welcomes people from all over the the world and forms a representative multicultural atmosphere in today’s society. Over these few decays, the country has always been consummating the laws to provide immigrants equal rights and freedoms, and better treatments they could receive. However, Canadian immigration laws were not unprejudiced and it eventually caused a “legal discrimination” before 1976. The legal rights of the immigrant groups have improved significantly because of the demands of developing the country, the influences of the wars, and the globalization of the world. Since 1880s, more immigrants and foreigners came to Canada because of the railway construction project.

The YCJA, Youth Criminal Justice Act is a federal law was proposed in 2002 and came into effect on April 1 in 2003. The main purpose of this act is to separate youth offenders aging from 12 to 17 from the adults and immaculately protect the right of youth offenders to the maximum and provide rehabilitation and reintegration for them, because the rights of youth offender outweigh the safety of the public. In addition, a particularly successful policy is the rehabilitation and reintegration of youth offenders, this policy is clearly illustrated by the Medicine Hat case. An essential policy of the YCJA is the rehabilitation and the reintegration of youth offenders, this policy provides assistance for youth offenders to realize the crucial mistake they’ve made in the

The article “Alberta Court of Appeal strikes down part of drunk driving law” analyzes the striking down of a section of the province 's Traffic Safety Act that allows immediate and compulsory suspension for anyone charged with impaired driving. Alberta 's highest court has ruled that the current law violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it ignores the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial before any punishment is imposed. The majority decision found the license suspension practice goes against the charter, as it assumes that every driver who is charged with an alcohol related offense is a danger. Under the current system, an accused impaired driver will have less suspended driving time (a difference

In 1993 the former Conservative home secretary Michael Howard famously said 'Prisons work '. In this essay, I investigate whether I believe this to be true. England and Wales have the largest prison population in western Europe .with a prison population rate of 148.3 prisoners per 100,000 citizens. Between 1990 and 2016 prison population saw a rise of roughly 90% with an average rise of 3.5% annum. As of the 31st March 2017, the population in prisons and young offender institutions in England and Wales stands at 84,537 currently.

Today crime is a frequent occurrence seen and heard everywhere. It is an central part of the risks in everyday life. Experts state that crime is associated with harm and violence; harm to individuals, destruction of property, and the denial of respect to people and institutions. Pressing problems of a social and individual nature exist in understanding crime. Though there is a lack of agreement on the most basic question, namely what crime is, everyone agrees that whatever act is against the welfare of the humanity is crime.