Fariha Fawziah | Chapter Three
In chapter three, the books A People’s History of the United States and A Young People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn provides a different historical viewpoint that is more descriptive and gives more insight than the textbook American History: A Survey by Alan Brinkley. The Zinn books additionally displayed the perspective from the indigenous peoples like Arawaks and the African blacks, the ones that faced prejudice and oppression in history, this can change one’s point of view on previous concepts on specific events or even a person.
For instance, Zinn went in depth for the initial cause of the Bacon’s Rebellion, which was because of a “chain of oppression in Virginia,” then he followed up with
…show more content…
For instance, according to A Young People’s History of the United States Zinn writes, “..the Virginians were angry that they couldn’t control the Indians. Maybe they envied the way the Indians could take care of themselves better than the whites did, even though the whites..were civilized and that the Indians were savages.” (page 25) A reader would wonder, why didn’t the colonists just want to live peacefully with them or at least try? The colonists may even have judged the Indians or African blacks from the outside. The textbook, however, focused on the kings and the companies controlling different plantations rather than what was really going through the colonists’ …show more content…
For example, based on A Young People’s History of the United States, Zinn wrote, “Of the ninety sailors who sailed on the three ships, nearly twenty boys!” (page 4) This gave an insight to the sailors taking more of a younger generation of males to give them an exposure to what the new world was like and as well as give them an early experience. This also ensures a stable future, since these young sailors would now know what to do with the Indians. The textbook mainly talked about other topics such as
After the Civil Rights movement, many historians took different perspectives on history. Up until the 1960’s historians considered the west vacant and unoccupied. Many cultures and peoples had lived in the West before Americans pushed westward. This new generation of historians noticed that in each of the following theories of Andrew Jackson, previous historians could not give an accurate interpretation of Jackson because they neglected to consider the West as occupied. This shift in ideology forced a reexamination of Andrew Jackson.
Seven Events That Made America America: And Proved That the Founding Fathers Were Right All Along is written by Larry Schweikart. Schweikart is an American historian as well as a professor of history at the University of Dayton. As a child he grew up in Arizona where he would later attend Arizona state university. While there, Schweikart completed an M.A. and later earned his Ph.D. in history from University of California, Santa Barbara in 1984.
1. Enumerate the sequence of major crises, beginning with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, that led up to secession, and explain the significance of each event? Uncle Tom's Cabin-composed in 1852 by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Stowe was an aboli-tionist who wrote this book to demonstrate the bad things that the slaves had to go through.
Both authors use the type of language and tone that try to persuade us, the readers, to makes us believe what they claim is true relying on evidence and using them to their convenience. Schweikart and Allen want to make us believe that Native Americans have that weakness on adaptation, a deficiency that make the reader think the authors objective is to justify the fact that the Natives Americans were mistreated by the Americans. On the other hand, Zinn uses a tone that make us believe that Americans are liars and selfish. The Americans in other words took advantage of the Indians, making it seem like the Indians were easily persuade just so they can fit in with the Americans, even though what they were promised was never going to become a reality.
Emergence of the Modern United States: 1897 to 1920 Identify and explain the importance of key events, people, and groups associated with problems of industrial capitalism, urbanization and political corruption. Events Pure Food and Drug Act (1906): This act was passed so that foods that were imported into the U.S, or even food commerce between states weren’t categorized as misbranded, thus for didn 't fail the test(s). Some foods had poisonous ingredients, and other ingredients that could cause people to get sick. They started to test all foods and medicines to make sure they were not addicting, and not unhealthy for humans to digest.
In Howard Zinns, A People’s History of the United States, chapter two was named “Drawing the Color Line” because of the line or division that was drawn between black slaves and the white indentured servants. Some similarities between white indentured servants and black saves are that they were both exploited and treated unfairly. Also both servants and slaves were viewed as lazy, irresponsible, dishonest and ungrateful. On page 37 Zinn writes “In the early years of slavery, especially, before racism as a way of thinking was firmly ingrained, while white indentured servants were often treated as badly as black slaves, there was a possibility of cooperation.” Although white indentured servants had a limited term they were still treated badly and also were a potential threat to the establishment.
William Novak presents an argument on how the history of American government has been told upside-down for many years now. Novak depicts a mighty American state, capable of a great deal and responsible for some of the most important narratives in American history. However, there were many people, of whom had great interest in the founding fathers, were irritated by Novak’s argument. The main group of people being referred to here were people from the Tea Party political movement.
A. Thesis Statement: During the period of the 1800s, Zinn proposes that our authorities bared with the idea of keeping slavery in tact due to its advantages until the point were it began to be abolished by a man known as Abraham Lincoln due to the rights of equality and freedom. Although Zinn makes it clear as to believing that slavery may not be abolished so simply as by pen to paper. B. Evidence used: 1. One point that Zinn proposed was fighting the reality of believing that in order to live in a society of peace with equality amongst the nation, a big occurrence or event must take place in order to go past the idea of slavery, I believe it proves that at that point our nation was under remarkable stance where they relied on the fact that slavery wasn’t going to be abolished without
Most think of Colonial America as the United State’s first stake in land. Some think of it in relation to Charlie Brown’s Thanksgiving special episode. While some truth holds to both of the previous statements, many do not understand or care to know the differences between each colony. From farming to foreign contact, each colony had different ways of living and standards within their society.
Vision of America Before Today America the Great. America the Powerful. America the Beautiful. Are many ways we use to describe America. We have had many great people say wonderful ideas and have powerful speeches about what America the Great should be; however, we have lacked to take responsibility and courage to become the great.
The African – American 's Assimilation into White America America is often considered the land of opportunities, a place where people can have a fresh start, a clean slate. America is a land that is made up of immigrants. Over the centuries America has been a place where people dream to live in, however the American dream wasn 't as perfect as believed; there were issues of race inferiority, slavery and social inequality amongst other problems. When a person arrives into a new society he has a difficult task ahead of him- to assimilate into that new society- which includes the economical, cultural, political and social aspects. In the following paper I will discuss how the African American, who came as slaves to America, has fought over the centuries to achieve equality in a white society that discriminated them.
The British colonies in the Chesapeake region and those of the New England region were both similar yet different in certain ways. One because both the colonist that settled there were looking for new opportunities. However, it was mostly second son aristocrats, which means the first born usually inherits the better half of the father’s riches. Their lives in England had either been mistreated or they were unable to flourish economically. Regardless of whether they were searching the land for expansive homesteads, religious freedom, or exchanging and merchant opportunities, the colonist in both regions were searching for another land in the New World.
The book is an apt textbook as it details the important concepts of colonial history in America. Hawke (1989) also takes a balanced approach in order to give the diverse viewpoints of notable scholars while discussing the history of early America. Moreover the topics clearly examine and explain every single section and notion including scholarly opinions. Overall the book has been excellently written and has highly researched text which provides knowledge to the readers about the early history of
As a young country, the United States was a land of prejudice and discrimination. Wanting to grow their country, white Americans did what they had to in order to make sure that they were always on top, and that they were always the superior race. It did not matter who got hurt along the way because everything that they did was eventually justified by their thinking that all other races were inferior to them. A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki describes the prejudice and discrimination against African Americans and Native Americans in the early history of the United States.
Howard Zinn’s unique perspective on American history and the beloved American heroes makes for an interesting story. His book, A People's History of the United States, paints history in a whole new light. The ninth chapter of his book, “Slavery Without Submission, Emancipation without Freedom” discusses the abolition of slavery in America and its effect and ulterior motives; it benefitted the elite, while not strictly freeing the slaves. He uses other like-minded historians, key people, and key events to prove his claims. His claims that the government’s support of slavery was due to practicality, and by ending it there was a safe and profitable reconstruction, rather than a radical one.