Summary Of Get Football Out Of Our Colleges By Steven Salzberg

Macur wrote, “Maybe they thought the issue would go away. Maybe they thought that if they turned their backs, these women’s voices would fade, like a wayward shot that disappears into the stands. Big miscalculation. ” Pathos was used here to make you feel angry that FIFA and everyone involved with the organization refused to acknowledge the women. Another use of pathos in the article was the statement, “Players wanted to play nice; they really did.

A Failure to Score Support Politics has become increasingly present in every aspect of our lives. Clearly, this is not a new occurrence. Toni Smith’s article titled “A leader is more than a messenger” published in The Sporting News proves that. The article was published in 2003 so it begs the question “Has politics always been embedded in everyday life, and no one cared, or is this new?” It does prove that taking a knee during the national anthem is not a new form of protest.

In the article titled “Why college football should be banned”, Buzz Bissinger argues that college football should be banned. I believe that Buzz Bissinger did not support his reasons with sufficient evidence. While he shows the reader multiple reasons why college football should be banned, he doesn’t cite any sources or show support for his claims. Bissinger shows some statistics, but does not show where he got the information from. First of all, Bissinger did not cite his sources when supporting his claim.

He makes an effort to persuade readers to disagree with football in American universities for these reasons in his essay titled "Get Football Out of Our University." He employs a number of techniques

The time when Teddy Roosevelt saved American football In the early 1900’s Theodore Roosevelt made an effort to save and reform what we call today American football. Teddy was a fan of football himself, he even said that it was his favorite sport. But at the time football was not safe as it is now, it was dangerous and sometimes even deadly.

Football is a very popular sport not only in American high schools and colleges, but also in the entire country of the United States. Is playing high school football worth the risk and harm inflicted to high school football players? This is the main question raised by the author, Raymond Schroth, in the article “Abolish High School Football.” In this article, Schroth talked about the disadvantages and harms of playing high school football to the players. Schroth argued that high school football should be abolished because it had contributed more harmful effects than benefits to football players.

I’m a big football fan, but I have to tell you if I had a son, I’d have think long and hard before I let him play football,” says President Obama (Fox News). The debate of whether or not football should be banned started with this speech given by President Obama. Recently, studies have shown that a large number of hits may cause more brain damage than a handful of concussions. Although people think banning football will decrease the amount of teen deaths and concussions; football should not be banned because it is just as dangerous as any other high school sports, many people would lose their job if it was banned, and football and sports help keep kids off the street. Football should not be banned because it is just as dangerous as any other

For many years has football has been considered the utmost dangerous sport in high school, but recently many new studies have been made to prove the exact opposite. High school football gives money to the school and improves the school. In high school sports when a team wins the championship the school gets money that can be used towards hiring new teachers, providing scholarships for students, buying new books, and overall improving the school itself. When a high school football team wins the championship the team's school gets $400,000 that can be spent on the school in many different forms.

Theodore Roosevelt in his letter to his son, The Proper Place For Sports(1919), proposes to his son that football in college is dangerous and he should think before he play. He supports his claim by first bringing up the subject, then telling his son of he should make the decision, then telling his son to not let sports get in the way of school, in closing he states general things going on to change the subject. Roosevelt’s purpose is to beget the problems of football in order to make his son realize the consequences of playing and make him rethink. He adopts a sincere tone for his athletic son.

Pathos is a rhetorical device used for providing emotion to the reader. He wants the reader to feel sympathetic towards the mistreatment of African-Americans. In the introduction, the first rhetorical device he introduced is pathos. Coates present pathos when he introduced Clyde Ross. He titles the first chapter as, “So that’s just one of my losses”.

In Steven Salzberg, “Get Football out our Universities”, he makes the argument that football in universities are holding the United States back in the race of science. He believes if the United States eliminates football all together in universities we would focus more on what universities were originally made for, which is science and math.   Throughout the argument Salzberg uses different types of rhetorical strategies to compel his audience to sway in his direction. Although, he used strong rhetorical appeals, it was hard to agree with Salzberg due to multiple logical fallacies Salzberg committed.

There have been a bunch of arguments on why college football as a whole should be banned in colleges and universities. Buzz Bissinger writes an article called Why College Football Should be banned and gives a great argument on why it should be banned. An ESPN article also talks about the pros and cons about football at the college level, which also can be called amateur football. This argument has been going around the United States now for a while now but some authors make better arguments about this topic than others. The authors of both of these Articles make strong and valid points on this argument but is ultimately up to the fans to decide on wither football should be banned at a collegiate level.

American colleges spend huge budgets on their football teams and this holds a disproportionate place in the lives of its students. Salzberg uses the emotion of fear regarding the risk to America of losing its reputation if they don’t eliminate football in our Universities. It tells of his personal experiences in the area to make his readers believe in his credibility. These appeals to pathos, logos, and ethos along with his sarcastic tone create an effective argument for convincing readers that football affects our educational system and status in the world negatively compared to other nations. Salzberg makes appeals to pathos in the beginning of his article.

Equally important, Pathos is an appeal to emotion, and is a way of convincing an audience of an argument by creating an emotional response. Stephen Yin, uses Pathos to sympathize with the emotions of the reader, illustrate an image, and create a sense of relatedness and familiarity. For instance, Steph Yin, begins by saying, “If you’re reading this at home, pause and put on a song you can’t resist dancing to. Go on, bop your head to the beat. Let yourself wiggle a bit.

“Football is the most popular sport in America for at least 30 straight years,” (Rovell, 2014.) Football is not only important to this University, but it is also extremely important to this nation as a whole. My perspective of the question, “Should football be banned?” is this, the sport of football is one of those things that everyone looks forward to at the end of the week. I have lived my whole life on the game, Saturday afternoons weren’t for going to the mall, they were for watching the Longhorns do what the know.