Summary Of No Spanking No Time-Out, No Problems By Khazan

"Turn off the Television and Read" was written by Albert Hodapp. His main idea of this article is to encourage parents with kids that reading has a greater impact on children than television. He believes that reading at a young age benefits children's intelligently, physically, and sustainability significantly. He uses rhetorical devices to appeal the audience to the same feelings. Hodapp uses pathos, logos, and ethos as rhetorical devices to display that watching television affect children's behavior, education, and health.

Throughout the Inaugural Address of Ronald Reagan (Rowland 85-88), his piece of rhetoric in the form of speech contained a strong emotional emphasis to gain the trust of the audience and to overcome the economic and governmental issues confronted the United States at that time. Reagan, starts by tapping into the nine different sub-strategies that produces an emotional response within the audience. First, he started by using the strategy of appeals to basic needs where he talked about how the US was confronted by the economic affliction, which led to the longest inflation of the US history “It distorts our economic decision, penalizes thrift, and crushes the struggling young and the fixed-income elderly alike. It threatens to shatter the lives

Ulterior Motives : an analysis of Olga Khazan’s “No Spanking, No Time-out, No Problem” Any parent can relate to having at least a few, if not a plethora of, instances they can recall their children exhibiting some form of problematic behavior. If there is a perfect parent out there who, on a long shot, has not experienced disobedient behavior from their children then feel free to object or perhaps approve of Khazan’s article suggesting that positive reinforcement promotes the ability to be more successful in achieving desired behavior in children rather than punishment. Most parents might feel as if they have tried everything to alleviate problematic behavior from their children’s lives, Khazan explores capitalizing on certain parents willingness

Love and Logic is a model of behavior management and discipline that was developed in 1977 by Jim Fay and Foster Cline. As its name implies, this model is based on the two core principles of love and logic. It is believed that the principle of love allows students to grow from their mistakes and that the principle of logic allows students to live with the consequences of their decisions. The primary goal of this model is to help students learn how to think and reflect on their actions and the impact of those actions on themselves and the people around them.

The inclusion of a rhetorical question forces readers to see how seemingly simular acts elicit differing responses from the public, and how this conditioned aversion is ‘damaging’ our young. Professor Susan Malone from ‘RACP Paediatrics & Child Health Division’ correlates Critchley’s contention by affirming that research shows a connectedness between corporal punishment and long term health issues such as ‘metal disorders and domestic abuse’. This appeals to the reader’s sense of protection and family, maintaining that the ostensible historical and innocent character of a ‘tap on the bottom’, could have unthought-of adverse effects on their own children. Emotive words such as ‘abuse’, ‘harmful’ and ‘depression’ are integrated not only in the first argument, but throughout the entirety of the opinion piece, to evoke a sense of culpability within parents who do ‘smack’ their children, outlining the negative repercussions these actions

Article “If You Are What You Eat, Then What Am I?” was published in 1999 in the Kenyon Review. The author describes her childhood life growing up with Indian immigrants. She feels a deep separation from not just her parents but her culture as well. Writer Geeta Kothari explores her personal identity through food. Kothari uses unique writing structure and personal stories to form a well-written piece.

[SHORTENED TITLE UP TO 50 CHARACTERS] 2 The consequences of spanking your child What does spanking actually mean? According to Webster dictionary, spanking means “to strike especially on the buttocks with the open hand.” Spanking still remains one of the most used forms of discipline even with all of the information available about the negative effect spanking has on the child.

They often plead that corporal punishment can show dominance, correct behavior, and that all children are different. Corporal punishment does display an aggressive form of dominance: but on the other hand, a child may revert to bullying other children to display dominance and also have high aggression levels and low patience. Similarly, physical discipline has never been scientifically proven to correct bad behavior long-term. Corporal punishment may fix an issue short-term, but eventually the child will do it again and spanking or hitting them will not fix the issue, rather they must address the issue in a calm manner and discuss with a child why what they have done is wrong. Given, all children are unique and react differently to a variety of different forms of discipline: corporally punishing a child has never been useful and a multitude of tests have been done on different children.

An assistant professor by the name of Catherine Taylor conducted a study of over two-thousand children to show how aggression played a role in students that were spanked in comparison to those that were not. According to Taylor, “children who have been spanked are at a greater risk of becoming bullies. ”(Favela). Disciplining a child by spanking them might cause pain for only a brief amount of time, but it is not worth the long-term problems that it could possibly cause. Any parent that chooses to discipline a child through the use of spanking should consider the harm and injustice that they are inflicting by doing so.

Most Americans would agree that spanking at home; regardless of the research showing, how it might inflict lasting psychological harm and does small to correct behavior. Being from a different era, disciplinary actions were accepted, and we never failed to respect our elders. Discussing this issue with our dad today, we still have and live by those standards set forth by them. Now critics of those studies, they do not account for the prominence of the issues. Punishing a child were misbehaving, and then they were already more likely to suffer troubles later on.

Some parents will agree to the fact that it is sometimes indispensible to hit a child; nonetheless, a few folks will contend that a child ought to never be punished physically. A few folks think hitting is ineffectual; others even think beating is oppressive. Preston says that he wishes to demonstrate that punishing is effectual. What's more, punishing is surely not the same as abuse. Spanking is agonizing, yet it ought to never leave enduring imprints like wounds or welts.

Lent also uses strong appeals to convey his argument. Dr. Lent also uses pathos to implicate several social complexity to evoke an emotional response to the audience, He uses phrases such as “brain development, social skills, behaviors, and even intelligence,” to reinforce how the quality of overprotective parents have it’s negative effects in their little ones day-to-day life. The author gives a sense of guilt that if parents are still choosing this path, the children will struggle in acquiring skills, acknowledge, and habits that will “leave them unable to deal with stress as adults.” Despite, the criticism the author gives, He also tries to uplift his audience through positive diction using words such as “beneficial,” and “positive” to motivate and inspire his audience how the use of acute stress will enhance a child’s growth in gross motor skills and enabling them to interact well with their surroundings.

Though it is difficult for logic to prevail over emotion. Pathos is yet an important effect in an argumentative essay. As it affects the reader’s emotion, gasping their attention, and allowing them to feel the author's main point. Many great writers use pathos to dragging the reader into the story as for this article the use of pathos was neglected. The statement “Women have to work three to five hours a day to collect wood fuel for cooking and heating.

Although many principles are related to changing behavior, there are two basic premises for a reinforcement to be effective. Those premises are either positive (being rewarded) or negative (being punished) consequences. If the result is a good consequence such as being rewarded, people are most likely to repeat the behavior. Whereas, on a negative consequence, such as being punished, the behavior will tend to avoid it. Three directions of reinforcement can be seen here.

(source used) D. Concluding Sentence: Therefore, it is obvious that physical punishment is still being used by parents widely, yet this idea can be easily opposed due to the physical harm that the child is exposed to and how this creates children’s fear from their parents rather than loving them. III. Body Paragraphs IV. First Reason: psychological A. Topic Sentence: There is overwhelming evidence that physical punishment is both ineffective and harmful to a child’s psychological development. B. What is meant by psychological problems?