"The Plunkitt of Tammany Hall" written by William L. Riordon about George W. Plunkitt's multiple talks in defense of his career in the political machine Tammany Hall. George W. Plunkitt was a ward boss of the Tammany Hall Political machine. It was full of corruption which made George W. Plunkitt wealthy. Before people knew about Tammany Hall being corrupt, George W. Plunkitt tried to defend Tammany Hall throughout his political career in order to keep making a lot of money. Some of George W. Plunkitt's talks were on his honest graft against dishonest graft, Civil Service reforms, Tammany Hall being patriotic, and how successful politicians do not drink.
The Tammany Hall political machine was corrupt. George W. Plunkitt honestly thought that
…show more content…
Plunkitt claims that there is nothing more patriotic than Tammany Hall. George W. Plunkitt compares Tammany Hall with the Civil service law. He says while Tammany Hall is having meetings on patriotism and that people could learn a bit about patriotism by attending the meeting, the Civil service reform people are running away to avoid the noise of patriotism on the 4th of July. He continues to say that Tammany Hall created the custom of giving everyone their own small American flags on the fourth of July and that American Flags are everywhere with Tammany Hall. He even goes as far as to claim that everywhere but the floors are covered in flags and even the window shades had been replaced with flags.
George W. Plunkitt tries to make himself look better in the public eye by saying he doesn’t drink alcohol. He claims that successful politicians and business owners do not drink while people who drink alcohol aren't successful. He says that of all the great leaders of Tammany Hall, none of them drink. George W. Plunkitt says that there is nothing wrong with temperance when it comes to business as it allows people to get up in the morning while not feeling
…show more content…
Plunkitt talks about how people are calling Tammany Hall leaders illiterate in this speech. He argues that while they aren't professors and bookworms, they are the people who are needed most to lead that district. He then says that while the leaders aren't bookworms, Tammany Hall still has bookworms helping the leaders lead.
In my opinion, the book was pretty good. It showed me how corrupt people can think when they believe they aren’t corrupt and that what they are doing is honestly good for the people. It also helps me realize how the people back in the day could have been affected George W. Plunkitt and Tammany Hall.
I believe the author did achieve his purpose in showing the world a system of political philosophy as stated in the preface. The writing is a bit motivating as is shows us George W. Plunkitt's many speeches on Tammany Hall and that we should support them. I believe that the book provides justice to George W. Plunkitt and Tammany Hall, mainly because the book is just George W. Plunkitt's speeches.
The book is strong in supporting Tammany Hall but George W. Plunkitt's speech could have been smarter, but I don't think that is really something that could have been changed. I'm not sure if the book itself really affected history but the content of the book being George W. Plunkitt's speeches have definitely affected
It is apparent that he doesn’t notice the difference between honest and dishonest graft: he compares the Tammany Hall to the Philly Republic gang and puts them into the same category. This goes again with Plunkitt’s quote about the looters only going in for himself. Plunkitt describes the members of the Philadelphia Republican gang as these “looters” who have consequently ruined their political career. Plunkitt considers himself and members of Tammany Hall to be honest by his definition, although some see any form of graft as abuse of the political system, but this was not something Plunkitt thought of
Woodrow Wilson’s character is given to the reader and allows the reader to have and understanding of what kind of a person President Woodrow Wilson was. It talks about his effects he had on the progressive era. Larson informs the reader about Churchill’s role as well. Larson’s provides Point of view for all of these character. It puts the reader in the shoes of the character.
A scenario gets presented in the book where Plunkitt buys a parcel of land that is to be purchased by the authorities and later sells it to them at a high price making high profits. He justifies this form of corruption by stating that what he did was to take advantage out of a situation. He calls it “politics business” and uses the inside information to his benefit. Plunkitt is so wise that he conducts corrupt activities without soiling his reputation. He still maintains his name as a good public loving
During the War of 1812, the British attacked the heart of our nation, Washington D.C. They were frustrated from the burning of their federal buildings in York, Canada, which is present day Toronto ,so they thought burning down the capitol was the best revenge. During the three days they were in the city, they set fire to most of it causing the majority of the small population to flee. When the citizens started to return, they found their homes and lives destroyed. The destructive actions from the British were brutal and set us up for a long road to recovering the nation’s capitol.
Starship Troopers appears to be a political essay as well as a novel where the government had limited democracy. However, Plunkitt of Tammany Hall government was a democratic machine. The main focus of this essay is to compare and contrast the governments of Plunkitt of Tammany Hall and Starship Troopers. Additionally, I am going to talk about the lives of George Washington Plunkitt and Juan Rico. George Washington Plunkitt was a political figurehead during the late 1800s until the early 1900s in New York City.
Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. By Joseph J. Ellis. (New York: Vintage Books, 2000. Pp. ix + 288.
In Hamilton, Mark Steinberg successfully divulges details of the life of Alexander Hamilton from his birth until his death. In as much, Steinberg conveys a wide-ranging journey of cluttered, blog style information on every aspect of Hamilton’s legacy as a revolutionary, statesman, family man, and a lover as an admirer of Hamilton. Therefore, this paper will critique Steinberg’s presentation of personal information about Hamilton as well as his admiration for Hamilton, and will also evaluate Steinberg’s cluttered writing style as he tells the story. This section contains a summary of Hamilton, with Steinberg beginning his book by stating his purpose in writing this book.
Serpico, the New York City cop who couldn’t be bought by nobody. Serpico is a book that tells a story about a cop that works in New York, that wouldn’t take any brides from anybody and who had to deal with a very corrupt police department. There was a big gambling problem going on in New York and there was nothing being done about it so Serpico being such an honest cop decided he would try to get rid of the problem. In the following book report over Serpico, by Peter Maas, I will summarize the book’s contents and give my thoughts over the book.
Third and final point is that the book has a political and moral ideology of America that many of us see the nation and its history. The book beginning talks about the labor of literally “scraping” crap off the streets of Baltimore in 1829. Rockman uses the background of four men who believe that they
It helps the reader truly understand the events leading to the war, the results from the war, and what the soldiers went through both during and after the war. Most of the information presented in Adams book is not normally presented in History classes and helps the reader broaden their knowledge on the topic. The book is also well organized. Adams presents his information in order. He starts off talking about the myths of the war, then goes to the events leading to the war, the talks about the war and what the soldiers went through, and then finishes the book with the results of the war.
In the book One House by Charlyne Berens discuss the foundation of the Nebraska Unicameral. This book begins with the history of how the unicameral came about and what the idea was behind it. I think that this book is interesting and provided a great background to why the legislature functions the way it does. I learned that the support for the unicameral came from those people who supported the populist movement. According to Berens Nebraskans in 1914 were less partisan and more likely to split their ticket (p.7.)
Abraham Lincoln and Civil War America is a biography that tells the life and success of Abraham Lincoln. At the beginning it talks about his life and how rough he grew up. As Lincoln grew up he wanted to learn to read and write because he was ashamed that his father couldn 't. Lincoln learning to read and write was a key factor to help him win the election and become as successful as he was. Even as a young child Lincoln claims to naturally be anti-salvory ( page 281). This is important to his stand point during the war.
A Lesson Before Dying 1. A Lesson Before Dying, Ernest J. Gaines, 1993, 256 pages 2. A Lesson Before Dying is set in a small Cajun community in the late 1940s. The story started in a courtroom where a black man named Jefferson was being prosecuted for assisting in a robbery in which a white man was killed. Jefferson was judged by white men and was referred to as a hog throughout the court session.
Our Founding Fathers were merely men, but they utilized their strengths and conquered their weaknesses to propel themselves into godlike statuses that molded each and every one of them into prominent historical figures. Katori Hall explained this perfectly when she said “We expect our leaders to be godlike. But I feel that when people try to sanctify leadership it puts it out of the realm of regular people. And that’s where the greatest leaders come from – from the people.” Our Founding Fathers harnessed their personal strengths and weaknesses, but this alone wasn’t enough to help them to succeed.
In chapter 10 of Pat Conroy’s novel, The Water Is Wide, Pat Conroy takes the children of Yamacraw Island to Washington, D.C. This trip was a great learning experience for the kids and was the farthest that any of them had ever been from home. They toured museums, shopped for souvenirs from street vendors, and ate hot dogs from hot dog carts. This trip taught many lessons to the children, and even to Mr. Conroy. Pat Conroy learned that trips are unpredictable in nature, and cannot be planned to the letter.