Summary Of Upside Down Mississippi Problem

Since the governments “creation” in 1776 when the united states separated from Brittan’s monarchial government, there has been substantial change in the powers of state and national government. From 1788-1937 power was divided strictly between state and national government, also known as Dual-Federalism. Under this, the power of the state government is greater than the power of the national government. Sometimes referred to as layer cake federalism, because the powers lay on top of each other but don’t intermingle. This was not favorable because there was a fear of northern dominance.

Second major issues were nullification. This is a concept which states if the federal government rules are unconditional then state has the right to ignore and nullify. In 1832, a state convention in South Carolina declared a high protective tariff null and void. (According to the Haggard, Thomas R (2007)

Have you ever wondered where our laws In Mississippi come from? It might seem like a law fairy is making them pop up, but unfortunately, that is not exactly what happens. It seems that way to us because state laws are something citizens do not have a large role in. However, someone who does have a large role in deciding these state laws is the State Legislature. With that being the case, there is a whole lawmaking process and inside that process are many important people and steps.

In McClesky v. Kemp the Supreme Court held that a study showing the death penalty in Georgia was imposed on black defendants disproportionately to white defendants failed to establish that any of the decision makers involved in the process acted with a discriminatory purpose. McClesky is a notable case in several respects. First, it highlighted the integrated nature of the criminal justice system and how each component functions to reach a certain result. Second, it emphasized the debate on which actors in the justice system have the most power and what role that power plays in reaching the result. Third, the case also underscored the importance on prosecutors keeping records of their decisions at varying stages of the criminal justice process.

Ch.1 R1 ¶1 – Settlers who came to the American colonies hoped to have a brighter future (;to own a farm, to start a small business, to live among equals.) ¶2 – The settlers wanted to make their own economic and political decisions based on their own needs. ¶3 – American colonists had to make important decisions about their government. ¶4 – The constitution creates the basic framework of the whole US government. R2 ¶1 – The government is divided into 3 branches in order to keep it from having too much power.

They also recognized that the States would need the authority to restrain a power-hungry federal

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Alexander, M. (2012). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: The New Press. Michelle Alexander in her book, "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness" argues that law enforcement officials routinely racially profile minorities to deny them socially, politically, and economically as was accustomed in the Jim Crow era.

Federalism was ultimately to blame for the slow government response to Katrina. Federalism refers to the division of political authority between a central government and state or provincial governments; a method of government that allows two or more entities to share control over the same geographic region. While Federalism ensures that state governments function independently, it also prevents the creation of a national policy and leads to a lack of accountability, which proved to be the case with Katrina, the most destructive storm in United States history. Governments have a lot of power to affect people’s lives.

Since its beginning, the United States of America has gradually and steadily expanded the oversight and power of its own federal government. This expansion has resulted in a plethora of effects on the relationship between local state government and the federal government, both negative and positive. However, the increased impingement from the federal government onto the constitutional rights of local and state governments has created an imbalance. A major part of this imbalance has stemmed from the advent and imposition of unfunded federal mandates. This increasing implementation of unfunded federal mandates over the years has begun to stir up trouble between the states and the federal government.

In some cases the spheres of government may actually be quite disparate and not overlap at all. During the Great Recession national Keynesian policies of counter-cyclical spending kicked in to help stimulate the national economy. However, states either by law or constitution, must balance their budgets even in times of fiscal austerity. Similar in the effects of federal mandates, this may also lead to the erosion of state sovereignty through an overreliance on federal funding. Additionally, there are potentially desultory effects on the national government’s intended fiscal policy outcomes.

After careful review of the assigned material The Untouchables: America’s Misbehaving Prosecutors, And The System That Protects Them, an article by Radley Balko published in the Huffington Post August 2013 argues Brady violations which are the failure to disclose, as a matter of law, exculpatory evidence, as required under Federal case law. Balko addresses prosecutor misconduct and lists the tens of thousands of prosecutorial misconduct cases that have been studied by ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity, USA Today, the Innocence Project , and Yale Law. Senate Bill s. 353 was introduced in Senate on 3 February 2015 titled Justice Safety Valve Act of 2015. This bill authorizes a federal court to impose a sentence in a criminal proceeding

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

According to the article The Devil in Devolution, the “devolution revolution” is seen as, “The shift in government’s center of gravity away from Washington and toward the states…” which translate to the return of power from the federal government to the state government. In recent years, the author of the article (Donahue) believes that the states have been given too much power, and the power of the federal government has been declining. The “tragedy of the commons” principle is when an individual abuses a shared resource to the point in which the supply is overwhelmed, and some people are unable to receive the resource. This applies to federalism because the states seem to be usurping all of the “power” from the federal government, so there

The national laws are not generally right, in light of the fact that better places have diverse circumstances. It is expressed that the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution presents critical energy to state governments, but accommodation with the government is a piece of what makes the United States a vote based system. The U.S. Constitution states that government law is the rule that everyone must follow. The idea of "states' rights" has generally been utilized to legitimize state support for indecent practices, for example, subjection and isolation. States governments and addition as National government have been fighting over power for many years.

Annotated Bibliography Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press. Alexander opens up on the history of the criminal justice system, disciplinary crime policy and race in the U.S. detailing the ways in which crime policy and mass incarceration have worked together to continue the reduction and defeat of black Americans.