Supreme Court Cases: Dredd Scott Vs. The Board Of Education

The Dred Scott verses Stanford was a Supreme Court case which recognized African American slaves not as people but as property. Dred Scott was an African American slave in Missouri for many years. Later he moved along with his owner to Illinois, then to the Wisconsin Territory where slavery was not allowed. After they returned to Missouri, Scott’s owner passed away. The owner’s wife took the ownership of Scott.

In 1619, the first slave ship docked on the New Land. Not until 1825, were African-Americans freed. Even after the 13th Amendment had been ratified freeing all slaves, life for a black man was much different from that of a white. In 1954 the Landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education occurred, stating that separate was unequal, but not everyone followed the rules set by Brown.

This case had to deal with the rights of the enslaved individuals in Missouri at the time. Dred Scott and his owner moved to Illinois. The reason why this case came to be was because in the state of Illinois, slavery was made illegal. After, moving to this state Dred then refusal to move back to Missouri where enslavement was allowed. The reason for Scott refused to move because now that he is in Illinois where enslavement was banned, he believes that he was a free man.

In both documents Brown vs Board of Education and Appeal to Congress for Impartial Suffrage arguments were made on what rights African Americans deserve. These documents are in different time periods but they both address the same issues. Except one is about the education of the African Americans and the other one is more broad and is about the rights that the Africans Americans deserve to get because they are apart of the American population. Brown vs. Board was significant in diminishing the "separate but equal" doctrine. It was a court case that took place in 1954 and discussed that African Americans should have the right to an education and they should not be segregated.

" Nevertheless, the case was decided in Barnette's

Many historians credit Earl Warren for being one of the first Supreme Court Justice’s that took a stance against segregation but other historians would differ with the fact that Warren’s efforts affected segregation only to a certain extent. His efforts led to other civil rights movements but his and the court’s decisions did not directly change segregation because schools were still very segregated. Because, Chief Justice Warren presided over the court that overturned the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, and thereby ended legal segregation, he should be credited with helping to put an end to segregation, at least to a certain degree. However, the results of the Brown v. Board case really only set the stage for the Civil Rights Movement to begin,

These court cases are a big impact to African American rights and their lives. Dred Scott v. Sanford, Dred Scott and his slave owner went to Illinois (which is a free state) then came to Missouri (which is a Slave state) but unfortunately the slave owner died, Dred Scott thought since he just came from a free state he can get freedom so he sued and his case went up 2 the Supreme Court which he loss cause a slave that 's below a regular person can 't sue the government and stayed a slave. The importance of this case is that slaves are not citizen and can 't sue the government and congress had a lack of power ban slavery in U.S. Territories As to the second case Shelley bought a house in Missouri but in that neighborhood there was a there was a agreement not all has sign to keep the colored away from the neighborhood so some of the neighbors were angry and wanted to kick Shelly out of the neighborhood so she sued the head of the neighborhood and won the case because the neighbors thought her there violated he 14th amendment which didn 't and was able to live in her house. The importance of this case was the case didn 't violate the 14th amendment and it changed for black people to buy a house

America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

It often seemed like everything was made more difficult for minorities, for no apparent reason, other than hatred. The ruling of this case was very important, because it would overturn the Plessy vs. Ferguson case. The question was not whether the schools were "equal," which they were under Plessy, but whether the doctrine of "separate" was constitutional, which was ruled as a "no" by the justices. In the end, the majority concluded that "Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to retard the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racially integrated school system." This ruling deemed the doctrine "separate but equal" unnecessary, which overturned the Plessy case, and said the plaintiffs had been denied equal protection of the law under the fourteenth amendment.

In the 1950's, people was separated by the color of their skin. If you were African American you could not use the same bathroom, use the same water fountain, nor attend the same school as white people. Segregation caused alot of friction in the world, especially in the southern states. African Americans had enough of being treated differently just because their skin was not white. Blacks decided to stop being silence and put up a fight.

The decision meant that black children could have the same facility and quality education as their counterparts in white communities, which changed the education system established by the Plessy v. Ferguson decision. The Brown v. Board of Education decision was a major victory for the civil rights movement. It helped to end the legal justification for racial segregation in public schools, and it paved the way for further progress in the fight for racial equality. Many argue that the supreme court decision has a profound impact on the change in the education system. Whereas many disagree and state that it has less or no relevance to the education system and that discrimination continued.

The case Dred Scott v. Sanford, this case addressed the slavery and the fugitive slave clause. It was initially argued February 11th through

Decades ago, children of various races could not go to school together in many locations of the United States. School districts could segregate students, legally, into different schools according to the color of their skin. The law said these separate schools had to be equal. Many schools for children that possessed color were of lesser quality than the schools for white students. To have separate schools for the black and white children became a basic rule in southern society.

“My fellow Americans: I am about to sign into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I want to take this occasion to talk about what that law means to every American.” This is how President Lyndon Johnson speech starts out. This speech was a monumental change within the Civil Rights Movement. This was the last step for African Americans to have the same rights as any other American within the United States.

The ruling thus lent high judicial support to racial and ethnic discrimination and led to wider spread of the segregation between Whites and Blacks in the Southern United States. The great oppressive consequence from this was discrimination against African American minority from the socio-political opportunity to share the same facilities with the mainstream Whites, which in most of the cases the separate facilities for African Americans were inferior to those for Whites in actuality. The doctrine of “separate but equal” hence encourages two-tiered pluralism in U.S. as it privileged the non-Hispanic Whites over other racial and ethnic minority