In And Then There Were None, Agatha Christie chronicles the deaths of the ten main characters. Slowly, one by one, each character is killed off by an unknown. At first, the deaths were suspected as suicides, but as the coincidences build up, the thought about murder provoked the remaining characters’ minds. 10… 9… 8… 7… 6… 5… 4… 3… 2… 1… everyone is killed. That isn’t the question though. The question is who is the killer? With an original plot of the story, the author adds an exciting twist to the story with suspense. One way Christie builds suspense is through the following repeated punctuation: ellipsis and question marks. Additionally, the author portrays many flashbacks that the main characters are having as their death inches closer. …show more content…
In the novel, Miss Brent is writing in an empty journal about how General Macarthur is dead. Suddenly, she writes how she knows the killer’s name, and after that, she states the killer’s name. Soon after, she thinks to herself about how she just wrote that. The author writes a thought addressed to Miss Brent: “Did I write that? Did I? I must be going mad…” (Christie 175). This thought with the ellipsis creates suspense for the reader because it makes the reader think about how Miss Brent would be mad (or crazy). Additionally, the question Miss Brent asked herself internally makes the reader question themselves why and is Miss Brent going mad. Moreover, the ellipsis also causes the reader to think about how Miss Brent going crazy would impact the storyline, creating a suspenseful scene, because we don’t know how that will change or twist the story. In addition, Agatha Christie uses many ellipses to communicate suspense to the reader. In the book, after another character was killed, the rest of the six are having dinner. At the end of the chapter, Christie includes ellipsis to make the scene suspenseful more than it already is. The author wrote, “Six people, behaving normally at breakfast…” (Christie 195). This sentence provokes many questions for the reader: Are more players going to be killed? Who is the killer? Does a player go crazy later in …show more content…
Close to the beginning, Vera was sitting in her room when she found a poem resting in a frame above the fireplace. After reading the frequently used poem, she had a flashback about something in the past that had occurred in her life. Agatha Christie remarks, “The sea that dragged you down to its depths. Drowned… Found drowned… Drowned at sea… Drowned--drowned--drowned…” (35). This creates suspense because it makes the reader think about how drowning is related to Vera. The following questions are only a few examples of what the reader might think after reading the flashback: Why doesn’t she want to remember the experience? Who drowned at sea? Flashbacks--if not explained--make the reader think about how it could be related to the book. The flashback described in the book is quite vague because it didn’t give much background information on how the flashback could be related to Vera. This leads to the reader thinking about why the flashback is important. In addition, another flashback was employed by the author. While General Macarthur was sleeping, he had a flashback. In the novel, the author described: “He’d known, perhaps, that Richmond was being deliberately sent to death” (Christie 84). This builds suspense for the reader because they would be asking themselves about Richmond and Leslie (two characters part
During the entire time up till her death, Vera was almost in a trance-like state. Almost blinded by what she wanted,
This structure gives perspective in a case that typically is one-sided. Capote uses this structure to show how twisted it is that the murderers commit a crime that ends the lives of a family while they themselves can continue to live their lives afterward. The story overall is devastating but because of this comparison between the perpetrators and their victims, the author manages to bring out an emotional response from the readers.
However, during family therapy, her therapist Dr. B makes Vera and her dad do a role-playing exercise revealing that they still are not over her mom: “We are realizing, simultaneously, that we have never dealt with Mom leaving” (King 217). Vera’s therapist helps her and her dad to recognize that they have never confronted the issue of her mother leaving them and encourages them to talk more about it. During discussions, Vera understands that she is not to blame and reminds her father that her mom left “[b]ecause she never got over her own baggage, not because of you or me” (King 232). This realization leads her to begin moving on, and so she clears her mother out of the house: “That night, we rearrange the living room and Dad throws Mom’s clothing into a few black garbage bags for Goodwill” (King 243). By letting go of her mother’s belongings she lets go of the hope that her mother would return and the idea that her mom left because of her.
she would be “filled with happiness as the carpet’s bright colours once again brought the room back to life.”(254) The memories represent the love that was so closely tied to the carpet, as well as a golden time where nothing was wrong in the narrator’s life. Therefore, when her mother decides to make immature decisions, this happiness quickly transforms into the opposite, making the narrator cherish these joyful memories even more. Similarly, the books in The Boat also symbolize the temporary that is experienced by the father and his daughters, as it is
“She seemed to always be repairing clothes that were ‘torn in the boat’ preparing food ‘to be eaten in the boat’ or looking for ‘the boat’ in our kitchen window which faced upon the sea (Macleod 3). Their life only revolved around the boat. Whenever father returned from work that’s what was always talked about, the boat. Another quote that set the mood of the story is when the narrator talks about his mother. He says: “My mother was of the sea, as were all of her people, and her horizon were the very literal ones she scanned with her dark fearless eyes” (Macleod 6).
How crazy would it be to interview criminals who murdered 4 people in cold blood? Well that’s exactly what Truman Capote did in this chilling book. In the novel In Cold Blood, Truman Capote used different rhetorical strategies to create sympathy and influence the idea that there are always two sides to every story. Some of the mainly used rhetorical strategies throughout the novel were imagery, diction, tone, and pathos. Furthermore, Capote also illustrated sympathetical emotion towards both types of characters, the protagonists and antagonists.
Passing by Nella Larson is a very ambiguous story. This book took place in the 1920s during the Harlem Renaissance. For quite some time American history racism has been an issue. Nella Larsen herself had been one of the women who wrote during this period of time. The story itself is about two women who are passing to be white, Clare Kendry and Irene Redfield.
By concluding a sentence with ellipses that trails off, this allows the reader to come to his or her own conclusions about how the sentence should end. This creates a somewhat mysterious tone at parts of the novel. The purpose of such a technique is to make the novel thought provoking for the reader. Capote's writing styles helps create a unique reading
The author uses inner thinking to make the story more suspenseful. One example of this is when Vera ponders hanging herself. On page 244, it
War causes separation between family and friends. This is because not everyone has the same opinion/beliefs about war. The Meeker family suffers from this problem as Sam, the eldest son, joins the American Revolutionary Army, despite the fact that the rest of the family are loyal supporters of the English King. In My Brother Sam is Dead, James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier use the craft moves of dialogue, inner thinking, and revealing actions to raise the suspense of certain parts of the book.
This piece of text is suspenseful to the reader because the reader does not know where the narrator is or what time period this event
There is always something that bothers us in life, whether it’s others or even our own conscious. In “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe, the narrator has a difficult time following through with his cruel acts because a part of him knows it’s truly wrong. Throughout the story, his crimes bring more tension between him and the old man. Suspense is created with his every move, leaving readers hanging on the edge of their seats. In “The Tell-Tale Heart”, Poe builds suspense by using symbolism, inner thinking, and revealing information to the reader that a character doesn’t know about.
The structure and genre of the prose fiction are subverted almost immediately, allowing Haddon to propose the sight of a different world. In the opening chapter the genre of murder mystery is made clear through truncated sentences designed to create tension, "It was 7 minutes after midnight". However, when it is revealed that the murder victim is a Mrs. Shears' dog, the
Doing this helps the readers see what she wants them to notice about each of the days. By so precisely dividing up her information, it makes the readers very capable in understanding each of the important details she makes sure to mention in her
“A Rose for Emily” is a unique short story that keeps the reader guessing even though its first sentence already reveals the majority of the content. William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” is the epitome of a work that follows an unconventional plot structure and a non-linear timeline, but this method of organization is intentional, as it creates suspense throughout the story. William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” follows an unusual plot structure, which creates an eccentric application of suspense to a short story. Throughout the story, there are no clear indications of standard plot structure in each section, such as intro, climax, and denouement. Instead, there are sections, which are not in chronological order, that describe a particular conflict or event, which in turn creates suspense, as each conflict builds upon each other to make the reader question the overall context and organization of the story.