Argument for Banning “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” Book in Middle Schools Published in 2007, “The Absolutely True Diary of Part-Time Indian” by Sherman Alexie says about the moving story of a Native American teenager named Arnold Spirit who made the bold decision to attend an all-white high school from Spokane reservation to find hope for the future in the Reardan. This volume won the National Book Award in 2007 and won several other awards. Even though this novel can be power of education, “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” paperback should be banned because this is not appropriate for middle schools. Firstly, bullying is one of the reasons to ban this novel. The main character is a usual target point for bullying because of his physical appearance. The author notes that “The …show more content…
It is unsuited for school age group. Besides, this book uses offensive words such as fuck, asshole, nigger and pussy etc. For example, in the book Arnold admits about masturbation “If there were a Professional Masturbator League, I’d get drafted number one and make millions of dollars” (Alexie 26). For this reason, the book is not appropriate for middle schools. For children, they are not capable enough to absorb these kinds of information from the book. Furthermore, it causes a lot of confusion and curiosity among young reader to know the meaning of those words. There is no warning sign in a novel whatsoever if there are offensive words. In conclusion, indeed, while this volume can be power of education, “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” book should be banned because this is unsuited for middle school students. It motivates bullying, racism, violation and sexual references. The books are normally banned for good intention or causes to protect the public, especially the young audience from controversial ideas. Reference to
Although this book talks a lot about sexual topics and has language that is not for the younger aged readers, it should not be banned from high school. Maybe in seventh or sixth grade but I think from eighth grade through high school this book should be allowed in libraries. The topics they talk about are a little on the edge but it’s things that students are going to learn about.
The idea to ban the book came about when students were asked to read it in school. Parents of the students reported, as said before, the book contained explicit language, references to child molestation, adolescent sexual exploits, and violence relating to the abusive father (“Banned Book Awareness”). High school parents began to challenge the book in 2010 at, William S. Hart Union High School District in Saugus (in California), and Sade-Central City High School. Successes in getting it banned took place in both Texas and Michigan. A parent at Traverse Public Schools said “It’s just really inappropriate for 13- and 14-year-olds” (“Banned Book
People wanting to censor books must follow a set of rules. First, they must provide evidence on why they believe this book should be censored. They should have a reason on why the particular novel has a dangerous effect on the youth. Second, they must provide psychological evidence that shows how reading a potential dangerous book could inspire students to flagrantly disregard authority. Although opinion is usually taken from people who frequently read, the issue of censorship should be taken into account from all
The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian should be taught at DHS. It teaches a person about reality and about the struggles of the world, yes it uses profanity and sexual, but it shows what can happen to a teenager and showing them what could happen to them. The absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian is a wonderful and fantastic book. Reardan, the all white school Junior transfers to, is about 23 miles off the reservation. This means he either has to hitchhike or walk because his family can’t afford the money for gas, that could be someone in a teen in Douglas community.
Should “Call of the Wild” be Banned? Did you know that Jack London’s “Call of the Wild” won the newbery medal in 1931? Even though this is true some still say that wonderful books like this should be banned from schools so that today’s youth cannot read them. However I disagree and say that we should let today’s youth read these books and that they should in fact not be banned from schools across the country. I believe this for several reasons; kids need to learn to be more mature, this book teaches many valuable things, and finally “Call of the Wild” and other books that are getting banned from schools are timeless Classics that everyone should have the privilege to read and enjoy.
Parents, guardians, and teachers are often times the ones challenging these books, for the sake of their children or students. The problem with banning the book is simply that authors’ have a freedom of speech and pen
Each book that is banned due to its content are for reasons, such as racial issues, violence, negativity,
The world is ever changing, and traditional mindsets must learn to adapt to the changes in society. Two Boys Kissing written by David Levithan is on a banned books list based on the cover being sexually explicit for the sole reason of the cover image being two male teenagers kissing, while a book None of the Regular Rules by Erin Downing pictures a heterosexual couple kissing, but is curiously not on the banned list of books. Students should have the option to read a novel they can relate to, because everyone is different, therefore students need access to all demographics they identify to(Top Ten Most Challenged Books Lists). Excluding a novel because of its alternative character choices limits the creative outlet of writers and therefore limiting students idea of the normal
If this website is active and available in most places why would they bother banning books? With resources like this anyone is capable of reading any book that they want or have
Originally published in 1990, The Things They Carried is a collection of war stories that took place during the Vietnam War. Due to its accurate and honest depiction of war, it has been banned for crude language, violence, drug use, and sexual innuendo. The author, Tim O’Brien, was born in Austin, Minnesota in 1946. Due to his service in the United States military during the Vietnam War, O’Brien is able to depict the war in a more graphic, and realistic manner.
These banned books also provide kids with valuable reading experiences to learn about topics like grief, divorce, and assault. Learning about these difficult topics
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
There are countless reasons that everybody should know why books are being banned all over the world! One of the reasons is that parents do not want their children to be exposed to inappropriate topics. Moreover, some books discusses topics that people object to like dark arts and homosexuality. However, there are also reasons why books should not be banned. When children enjoy books, it improves their vocabulary, and it teaches them life lessons.
Why do books get banned? It seems ridiculous why can 't it be the readers choice Books get banned all the time for all sorts of reasons anything from sexual activity to negativity. What is the point of banning books? Is it the parents not wanting to expose their children to the real world. “Looking for Alaska” is an amazing book yet, it is banned for being real.
Censorship is another word for banning, the government/libraries/schools are keeping these books away from the public. Students should be able to read what they please, and they should not be stopped from doing