California is the “beauty of the eye of the beholder” since all people who come from different background, race, and religion are able to set their own dreams without being criticized. People especially immigrants have viewed California as the “land of opportunity,” which influenced them to leave everything behind in their hometown, to sacrifice their time and to focus on their dreams. Despite the fact that California was lauded as a utopian society, people soon found out that they were going through endeavors and couldn’t overcome them quickly as possible. In fact, Mr. Rawls wanted to express the grievances, struggles, and success that people endure in their rise to the California dream in his short essay, “California: A Place, A People, …show more content…
According to the Constitution, people can’t be stripped from their inalienable rights which are “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Despite the implement of the Constitution, “freedom” was defined differently in the 1980s than it was in the 20th century. Back in the 1980s, “freedom” was still not seen as a right to all people due to some of the laws such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act” that were implemented to go against the Constitution. While, in the 20th century, “freedom” was viewed as a right since “freedom” was offered to every people no matter what their race, their color of the skin, their religion, and their sexuality. For example, former president Barack Obama was able to make same-sex marriage legal, lifted the restriction on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” barred employers for firing their employees for being either transgender or having a different sexuality, allowed everyone to have universal access to ObamaCare, and had a diversified cabinet that helped Obama make tough decisions to make America the most affluent and strongest country in the world. As a result, Mr. Rawls was able to define “freedom” and “opportunities” in the same sentence since these aspects are the “harbinger of the American future” (Rawls, pg. 25). In addition, we were able to notice the “freedom” (Rawls, pg. 23)” in “Of Cholos and Surfers” by Jack
In Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California, Tomas Almaguer (2009) describes how race and racism coincides to facilitate the birth of white supremacy in California during the late nineteenth century. The idea of racial formation allowed groups to establish their power and privilege over defined racial lines. For each of the three racialized groups presented Chapter one combines the historical and sociological framework to describe the transformation of Mexican California. Through highlighting the historical accounts of racialized groups, fear of potential threats to white workers creates white supremacy. He continues by describing the peopling of Anglo-CA from 1848-1900 with the immigration of Irish, German,
California Rising: The Life and Times of Pat Brown by Ethan Rarick is a captivating read. As a reader you are immediately drawn in by Rarick’s lively, fast-paced, critical and fully informed work. Ethan Rarick illustrates the story of a pivotal era in which the idea “the future happens first in California” becomes a reality as told in the first biography of legendary governor Edmund G. “Pat” Brown. Rarick imparts boldly on those who charted its course – including Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy, and the Brown family dynasty.
The Revolutionary Reconstruction After America was devastated by the Civil War, several critical developments were instituted into the general idea of revolutionizing the future of America in constitutional and social aspects. In the reconstruction period of 1860-1877, several of these conflicting proposals, such as the additions of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments and the essential compromises to balance governmental powers, loomed amongst the future of black citizens and the future of America. Although it is argued that these acts did not contribute long or short term benefits to the overall betterment of our developing nation, I believe that the majority of the implicated concepts provided concret reasonings to perhaps provoke the greatest
During the first half of the 19th century in the United States, there were some African-Americans in the Northern states classified as “Free Blacks.” However, as these free Blacks are not slaves, they were not truly free. This group contained certain human rights such as voting, assembly, religion, school, and so on. Yet, all of previous rights mentioned had major restrictions. As well as limitations, there was most certainly discrimination against non-Whites.
California has made new claims that they plan to break away from not only the rest of California but from the United States as a whole. In most cases the people of a state are the ones who threaten to leave of something they are against happens. But this time it is different, California’s leaders and officials are also supporting California 's break-away from the United States.
President Johnson’s Commencement Address at Howard University in 1965 was an important piece of history explaining the impact of civil rights bill of 1964 and the continuing pursuit of civil liberties through the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Moreover, his speech remains inspirational concerning how the government will uphold every US citizens equal rights and opportunities according to legislature passed during President Johnson’s tenure. When observing his commencement speech, President Johnson iterates the core principles of freedom our US citizens should receive. For instance, he said “Freedom is the right to share, share fully and equally, in American society to vote, to hold a job, to enter a public place, to go to school (Ball, Dagger, O’Neill, p. 145, 2020) This
California was born in the middle of many issues of conflict. Crisis over slavery, political legitimacy, and conflict over land, labor, race and ethnicity ( Competing Vision 132 ).During the mid 1800’s California saw many transformations, some positive some negative. There was a slow reservations development for Indians, but a better established land ownership. With certain political figures, who rallied to remove laws, which discriminated against African Americans and rather high religious tolerance, California was taking a distinct shape.
Many women had to stay home making only 8% of California female. The American Dream, ultimately, was only applicable by American men during the California Gold Rush. Not only was the Gold Rush kept from women and foreigners, it also discriminated against
A brochure for “Reminder Day” expressed that homosexuals were often not treated as equals and that the Federal, state and local governments have shown bias towards these individuals. Although some religions would perceive homosexuality as a sin, the individuals are still human and should be given the same opportunities as the rest of the population. In the past, the Declaration of Independence promised natural rights for all men, but some rights were not realized for minority groups. Over time, parts of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were revoked and amended so that in today’s world, all “men”, including women and minority groups, all have the same rights.
She presents a logical and well-reasoned analysis of the cultural changes in California and their broader implications. By grounding her claims in facts and historical context, she appeals to readers' intellect and encourages them to consider the validity of her arguments. Furthermore, Didion evokes pathos through vivid descriptions and emotional language. Her use of sensory details and emotive words elicits an emotional response, prompting readers to engage with the essay on a personal and empathetic level. Through pathos, Didion taps into readers' emotions, encouraging them to reflect on
Liberal traditions are significantly rooted in the argument for open borders. The concept of open borders can not be correctly understood without studying its liberalistic ways. John Rawls is a theorist whose ideas against immigration revoke the liberalism that surrounds open borders. However, the three thinkers who support open borders as liberalism are Joseph Carens, John Mill, and Sheyla Benhabib.
That is what I love about being a Californian. I can walk through my community and witness different cultures within our country. In terms of how I keep myself getting frustrated with ignorant or hurtful comments from my buddies that I served with, I do my best to first find the humor in it. Then I do my best to educate them on how I was raised or how I consider the culture of many Californians to value the empowerment of women and to treat them equally. I also express that my mother, older sister and my wife are very vocal, goal driven individuals that follow their professional and personal desires.
Californians today live in a state that is one of the fundamental blocks for the economy of the United States, which California’s economic model is based on the concept of mass production, circulations, and utilizations of goods and services. In addition, this model would permit new occupations to emerge throughout the years, enhancing the economy and providing an opportunity for young adults. However, this philosophy that was established by California’s economists is being overlooked by the recent bill that was approved by California’s legislature on April 4, 2016. This proposal is known as the Senate Bill 3 (SB 3) that was signed by California’s Governor Brown in legislation, enforcing California businesses to increase the income for their
In the series of articles written by John Steinbeck, Harvest Gypsies, Steinbeck describes the inhumane conditions and abuse enforced upon the new migrants composed of Dust Bowl refugees. Through detailed accounts of the squatter camps and recurring descriptions of the helpless migrants that live in them, Steinbeck conveys a powerful image of the migrants that invokes sympathy from the readers. Along with gaining sympathy for the migrants, he also shines a light on the oppressive Farmers Association and other large farm groups that controlled the labor in California. In doing so, he exposes the people and the government of California for their combined systemic attempt to keep the new migrants subjugated to poverty and unorganized in order
Through imagery, symbolism, and diction, the two passages collectively offer a pessimistic critique on opportunity in America: although the American dream can certainly reinvent one’s future, the dream cannot alter one’s past,