oshua Haas
October 6, 2014 Intro to Criminal Justice Miller Vs. Alabama
On June 25, 2012 the Supreme Court had rule 5 to 4 that Miller was guilty to committing murder and was sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole. On that day in June the court had struck down all of the statues that was requires for a child under the age of 18 to be sentenced life in prison. At, the time of the crime Miller was only 14 years old. July 15, 2003 Evan Miller and His Friend Colby Smith where at Evan Millers house when neighbor Cole Cannon walked to his house and asked for some food. When Miller said we don’t have any food Cannon left, miller and smith went to Cannons house and rooted around for drugs and whatever else. When they
…show more content…
When firefighters showed up and the police interview Miller they knew it was an “obvious Suspicious”. The police handcuffed Miller and read him his Minor Miranda rights. When asked about the event that happened that night Miller denied all doings of burning down the trailer but admitted to stealing the $300. After doing further more investigating they finally could convict Miller and Smith of aggravated murder in the first degree. And charged with a course of …show more content…
They can get their high school degree and even maybe a college degree just by attending the classes that the prison offers. Evan miller only being 14 years old at the time in July of 2003 walking over to his neighbor’s house after he came over and asked for food then passed out in his own home, Evan and the other minor Colby went to his house brutally beat him and then proceeded to burn down his mobile home. After the emergency crews showed up it was anything but obvious what had happen. After a 5 to 4 vote in the supreme courts miller was sentence to a mandatory life sentence in the Alabama state prison without the possibility of parole. Miller is currently spending his mandatory life without parole in the Alabama state
Impact: The Supreme Court decided that the minimum age for the death penalty in capital cases is 16 years old. Case: Schall v. Martin (1984) Issue: Martin’s attorney felt as though Martins’ preventive detention violated the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. Facts: Gregory Martin was a 14 year old kid, who was arrested on December 13th, 1977 in NYC. Martin was charged with first-degree murder, second-degree assault, and criminal possession of a weapon.
HORNELL (WENY) - Authorities have upgraded the charges against the Hornell man accused of killing an 18-month-old baby in November. After a Steuben County Grand Jury heard the case against 22-year-old Dakota Miller of Hornell, the charges against him were upgraded. Miller is accused of intentionally killing 18-month-old Ian Miniske-Huff on Nov. 25. Miller is now facing charges of aggravated murder, first and second degree murder and manslaughter. "The game has changed dramatically for Mr. Miller at this point.
Case Identification: 428 U.S. 153; 96 S. Ct. 2909; 49 L. Ed. 2d 859; No. 74-6257; Gregg v. Georgia. It was argued on March 31, 1976 and was decided on July 2, 1976. Facts: The defendant, Troy Gregg, sought the review of the decision from the Supreme Court of Georgia, which affirmed the opinion that the death penalty is not a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Gregg was charged with armed robbery and murder.
In a new 2012 case, Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that mandatory sentencing of minors convicted of homicide to
Therefore, the rule in effect at the time Smith was sentenced, replaced shortly after the adoption of this rule, it provides that a juvenile court judge may not set aside a conviction of a juvenile offense which if committed by an adult would be a felony for which the maximum punishment is life imprisonment or an
Skeete, C., Opinion of the Court Ms. Courtney Skeete delivering the opinion of the Court for the case of West Central Dixie State University v. The Asian Society and The Sons of the Confederacy. I. The Asian Society and The Sons of the Confederacy challenge West Central Dixie State University’s policy of positive segregation claiming that it is unconstitutional by violating the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These two separate instances occurred on the campus of West Central Dixie State University within two weeks of each other. The Asian Society claimed Asian students and Asian culture were not being equally promoted and supported on campus as other minorities; such as the African-American and Latino minorities.
The man accused in a deadly shooting outside an Evansville Gentleman’s Club will not go to trial after this month as scheduled. Clarence Miller’s trial was set for October 16th, but it’s been moved to January 22nd in Vanderburgh County. That shooting happened outside the Pony Gentleman’s Club in April of this year. Miller is accused of shooting and killing Aaron Jennings of Sebree and injuring a second
The case of Skinner v. Oklahoma was argued on May 6th, 1942 and decided on June 1st, 1942. The Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act provided sterilization for a man or woman crimes involving “moral turpitude.” Oklahoma defined a "habitual offender" as someone who had been convicted two or more times which amounted to felonies involving moral turpitude and in result was sentenced to imprisonment. In this case, Jack T. Skinner had been convicted of three crimes, one for stealing a chicken and the other two for armed robbery.
Coker v. Georgia is a case about a man, Ehrlich Anthony Coker, that was serving time for sentences of murder, rape, kidnapping, and assault. He managed to escape from prison and commit several other crimes once he escaped. Of these crimes committed once escaped were rape, armed robbery, and other offenses as well. Coker broke into a Georgia family’s home and raped the women home at the time and stole her car. Due to the nature of his crimes, he was sentenced to the death penalty.
We see multiple successes of voting equality attempted through amendments, however, the Supreme Court’s decision on Shelby County v. Holder has pushed back years and years of effort for voting rights. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling was in Shelby County’s favor, stating that the Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional along with Section 5. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr, who wrote the majority’s opinion, said that the power to regulate election was reserved to the states, not the federal government. As a result to the court’s decision, the federal government can no longer determine which voting law discriminates and can be passed. After the case, many states had freely passed new voting laws; the most common voting law states passed
The Scottsboro Case is the case of nine African-American teenagers brought before the Court of Alabama on charges of rape in 1931. The case became a landmark in the struggle against racism and a fair trial. The court had all white juries. On March 25,1931, many people were trying to ride the train traveling between Chattanooga and Memphis,Tennessee. Many white teenagers jumped off the train to tell the sheriff that they had been attacked by a group of black teenagers.
Jeffrey Dahmer ~was born in 1960, Jeffrey’s father was not around much because of his job. When Jeffrey was at the age of four he was diagnosed with a double hernia. The operation scared him letting doctors explore his body. His experience is said to have marked his subconscious forever. He became very insular and lacking in self-confidence.
State of Georgia V. Marcus Dwayne Dixon (2003) Marcus Dixon was a highly recruited high school football player. His life suddenly took a tragic turn when he was falsely convicted of raping a 15 year old girl. The elements around his false conviction could have been avoided with some reform to the criminal justice courts system. Dixon initially had many charges against him but were narrowed down to statutory rape and aggravated child molestation. There was much racial disparity surrounding the jury on Dixon’s case, in that the county that Dixon committed his “crime” was a predominantly white population.
On November 28, 2001, 12-year old Christopher Pittman shot and killed his grandparents, Joe and Joy Pittman, in their South Carolina home. The moments leading up to the murder of his grandparents, Christopher patiently waited for his grandparents to fall asleep. Once he felt his grandparents were soundly asleep, he shot both of them in their beds — they never saw what was coming. After he murdered them, he set his grandparents’ house on fire and he fled from the flames by driving off with his family’s truck. The only items that he brought along with him were some money and weapons.
Alabama are still in debate. The Supreme Court still hasn’t decided whether or not the ruling would apply to past cases. But the decisions one makes at the age of 14 aren’t the same as 24, 34, or 44 and for that matter they deserve the opportunity of parole after a fair sentence. It does give the current youth an opportunity to parole or not to be sentenced to life without parole. Miller vs. Alabama was, “the third in a decade that puts new constitutional limits on crimes involving juveniles” (Savage) being one of the biggest rulings in recent court.