The deliberation of bioethics in human cell and stem cell research has flip-flopped altercations between whether stem cell research corrupts the future or if basic ethical uses in clinical research are being held to its standards. The idea of having genetically altered drugs and cells sits with people the wrong way, and with that they have come to the decision that cell research will cause more problems than it stopping them. However, while a majority of people and scientists believe genetic engineering is an evil corruption of nature’s course, genetic engineering has the greatest potential to do something great for our future, but it is our moralistic responsibility to follow the rules of bioethics. The author of The Immortal Life of Henrietta …show more content…
The story is about a black woman who was diagnosed with cervical cancer and her tissue samples were taken without her consent, creating the now controversially famous HeLa cells. These cells lived on even after she died and were continuously tested on despite the lack of consent. It states from early on, indirectly, that it would be mostly focusing on the idea of how, “There’s no way of knowing exactly how many of Henrietta's cells are alive today.” (Source D). And from the author’s view, we can see from the beginning the attachment Skloot has to this subject, “I’ve spent years staring at that photo, wondering what kind of life she led, what happened to her children,” (Source D). It is interesting how at first glance it may not seem as if this was how the book would let on, but this is how the story’s base formulated. Skloot also brings in many good points, about how Lacks’ race and gender probably affected her treatment, “Her light brown skin is smooth, her eyes still young and playful, oblivious to the tumor growing inside hera tumor that would leave her five children motherless and change the future of medicine.” (Source D). This is stated in the very first lines of the book, giving emphasis on how this will be a big deal in not only the future of medicine, but in how people are treated due to prejudices. Reading further into the book, when we see
Dana Garcia Ripley Honors English 2 20 March 2017 Lack of Justice The book The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot tells the story of an African American woman named Henrietta Lacks whose cells made one of the greatest medical contributions ever. Henrietta Lacks died of cervical cancer at the age of 31. Cells were taken from her body without her knowledge. Rebecca L. Skloot is a self-employed science writer who specializes in science and medicine.
This led to major breakthroughs in the medical world and allowed scientists to experiment effects of toxins and cures. “If the whole profession is doing it, how can you call it 'unprofessional conduct'?" (Skloot, 134) Skloot wrote this book to unveil the injustices that the Lacks family and many other African-Americans went through. The key passage shows that many medical professionals used the “everyone else is doing it” defense to justify their unethical behavior.
Within the novel The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks written by Rebecca Skloot, Lacks and her family face many adversities. One adversity major mistreatment of Henrietta is while she's in the care of Dr. Gey. During her struggles Dr. Gey was removing tissue samples without informing Lacks his full intentions which was very wrong, but the arrival of Henrietta's cells proved to be vital in the advancement of the Science and medical fields. A sudden boom of new scientific research, and medical breakthroughs were now within in reach. One example of a major solution solved by HeLa cells was the expense of culturing cells, before Scientist would have to kill monkeys to obtain cells in order to run neutralization tests, this proved to be costly and
The book, clips, and movie have shown the controversy of medicine and research, as a patient’s cell is currently being used without the family’s consent. The overall story and plot of this book and film have been overly emotional because of the grief of the family as they face hardship without Henrietta. The story starts with the author, Rebecca Skloot, and her experiences with Deborah in discovering the backstory of Henrietta Lacks. Rebecca got in contact with Deborah’s family to write her book about “HeLa” cells because she got interested after a lecture with her professor. The reasoning is because no one is aware of the background of these cells.
The book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” written by Rebecca Skloot revolves around an African American woman who began life as a poor tobacco farmer, but soon after being diagnosed with cervical cancer in 1951 would unknowingly become one of the most important people in history. Unfortunately many would come to simply know her as “HeLa” the first “immortal” human cell line instead of another human being who had the right to know what doctors would soon do to her. She was strong woman and great mother to five unique children; Elsie, Lawrence, David (Sonny), Deborah, and finally Zakariyya (born Joe). The story itself tends to transition between the past and the present day. It gives us the story from both the perspective of Henrietta’s
TIC673 HeLa Assignment 2018 In one of the best seller novel, “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” the author Rebecca Skloot describes about the first human immortal cells that lived in laboratory culture and about the story of black, 31-year-old woman from whom these cells were obtained. The cells which not only proved to be most important in the field of medicine but also brought medical revolution were obtained from her without her or her family’s knowledge leading to the most debatable ethical issues. The following essay would describe the cell’s contribution to science, how they were obtained and some of the ethical issues violated. Henrietta’s cells did much good for the society.
These cells, however, turned out to be unique in that they were able to grow and multiply outside the human body, making them invaluable in medical research. The movie follows the journey of journalist Rebecca Skloot, as she investigates the story of Henrietta Lacks and her "immortal" cells. Skloot travels to Baltimore to interview Henrietta's family and learn more about her life and legacy. She uncovers a complex and often painful history that sheds light on issues of race, class, and medical
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is a book that includes her biography, then her childhood to her tragic death; the story of her family over various decades; Skloot’s research and her relationship with the Lacks family, especially Deborah; and the story of the HeLa cells. Henrietta Lacks was known by scientists as HeLa was a poor black tobacco farmer whose cells were taken without her knowledge in 1951, and then became one of the most important tools in medicine. They were necessary for the development of the polio vaccine, cloning, and much more scientific developments. A doctor at Johns Hopkins took a piece of her tumor without her consent and then sent it down to scientists who been trying to grow tissues in culture for decades. Henrietta's
Compared to the Lacks family, the Lacks knew their mother didn’t give consent for them to be using her cells for research. Skloot gives this example to the readers to compare both victims and their families suffered from misuse of informed consent. Even though this happen to the Henrietta in the 1950s, John situation is a little more current in time, it
The immortal cells from her ultimately fatal cervical carcinoma were taken without her knowledge or consent by white doctors in the segregated ward of Johns Hopkins Hospital. It wasn’t until the 1970s that her family members found out that their wife and mother’s cells were alive in laboratories all around the world or that biotech companies had made millions of dollars selling vials of HeLa cells while most of the Lacks family lived in poverty and often couldn’t afford health insurance or medical care . In this story and much of the discussion it has prompted, I find an unsatisfactory engagement with the aforementioned entanglement of race, gender, class and sexuality. It is this intersectional assemblage that I will grapple with in this
I recently finished reading The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lack, a biography about Henrietta Lacks and how human tissue was taken without consent then used for medical research. Henrietta Lacks, was a poor colored woman with very little education, who died from uremic poisoning, due to the treatment for cervical cancer October of 1951 at age 31. In January of 1951, Henrietta went to Johns Hopkins Hospital because she found a knot on her womb and was bleeding and pain in her abdomen. Johns Hopkins is known for being the best research hospital around, Henrietta did not go because it was the best place to go, she went because it was the closest hospital that treated color patience. She was first diagnosed with abnormal pain and bleeding in her
Ultimately, I contend that all multitude of instances that the Lacks family was taken advantage of set the foundation for Deborah to trust Skloot. Unlike the other news reporters, authors, or doctors that approach the Lacks family, Skloot made an effort to connect with the family by spending time with Deborah’s cousin cliff, and walking Henrietta’s tobacco fields. Moreover, Skloot was one of the first writers that aimed to focus more on the Life of Henrietta, instead of HeLa cells. When Deborah first accepts Skloot, Skloot realizes that the media completely perplexed the Lacks family. Despite everything that had occurred, the Lacks family still did not have a defined understanding on what HeLa cells actually were and what they were used for.
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks tells the story of Henrietta, an African-American woman whose cells were used to create the first immortal human cell line. Told through the eyes of her daughter, Deborah Lacks, aided by journalist Rebecca Skloot. Deborah wanted to learn about her mother, and to understand how the unauthorized harvesting of Lacks cancerous cells in 1951 led to unprecedented medical breakthroughs, changing countless lives and the face of medicine forever. It is a story of medical arrogance and triumph, race, poverty and deep friendship between the unlikeliest people. There had been many books published about Henrietta’s cells, but nothing about Henrietta’s personality, experiences, feeling, life style etc.
This is not only informative, it also strengthens the ethos by proving the author is knowledgeable and supporting the first person experiences of the novel. Instead of stating “this is the family of the patient,” the author uses personal experiences and specific facts to characterize all members explicitly (Skloot 273). The details and experiences are connected by and transitioned with the shifting point of view. Although Skloot was an important character, her main purpose was to report and tell “everybody in the world about [Henrietta Lacks]” (Skloot 206). As a result, the third person is more prevalent than the first person aspects of the novel.
Racism in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Imagine your mother, sister, wife, or cousin was diagnosed with cervical cancer and you believed the doctors were doing everything in their power to help her. Only later you discovered her cells were used for research without consent and she was not properly informed of the risks of her treatment due to her race. This story happened and is told by Rebecca Skloot in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. Skloot use of narrative and her writing style enhances the understanding of the story. Henrietta Lacks was a young black woman who was diagnosed with cervical cancer at John Hopkins Hospital.