Advantages And Disadvantages Of Free Government

The representatives would be the voices of their constituents, leaving them with the responsibility of making decisions for the public good.

As tensions in Great Britain grew economically and politically, the American colony declared themselves an independent nation. Gaining their independence was significant, however, keeping it would be the challenge. The Americans knew a stable federal republic was essential to remaining independent, thus they created the Constitution. Although, the creation of the Constitution and the equality it ensues a controversial issue, the Constitution did not fulfil the job it was designed to do. The document did not establish a fair government.

10, advises that perhaps one of the foremost arguments that promotes the Constitution as the premier form of government, in countering the Anti-Federalist ideas, is the argument that a national, federal system is the best way to fight the factional elements found within. The representative government outlined in the Constitution, such that the citizens elect representatives who then vote and create law with the citizens’ best interest at the fore, is a much better alternative to the states current situation, that of broken unification and growing dissent. As opposed to direct democracy, where every citizen is involved directly in the law making process, is already at the outset not set up for success, because the aforementioned factions will form majorities and vote on law as best suited for themselves, and the minorities end up with no say or voice in the law-making process. Though factions are almost a given in any democracy, a strong, federal government that backs up the states will have much more power to quell any factional attempt to form majorities that until now the disenfranchised states had no power to

Legislative and judicial decisions are the results of faction, as the decisions made affect “the rights of large bodies of citizens”. Justice would balance the views of each side, “and the most numerous party… or… the most powerful faction must be expected to prevail”. Madison stated that a single, uniform party in power will adopt legislation that benefited the class that party represented, but allowing more parties and therefore more people to participate makes the legislative process more democratic and less like a monarchical form of government. The thesis is extended: “The inference to which we are brought is, that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its EFFECTS”. It is the goal of government to then limit the extent to which factions influence politics through partisanship, so as “to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government”.

The existence of the Electoral College has remained a source of debate for the population of the United States for centuries. Despite the evident discontent surrounding it, the United States is largely unaware of the disconnect between citizens’ voices and the Presidency. It can be said that popular sovereignty, no matter how pleasant a concept, has become little more than an illusion the people cling to. In short, the Electoral College is an institution that must be abolished, because it violates political equality, is unfair to third party candidates, and is not an accurate representation of the people’s votes.

Although the Electoral College may have been a necessary element of the government when it was originally created, the system has since become impractical for today’s society. The will of the people is now far better expressed through the resulting popular vote than the electorate of the Electoral College. The flawed winner-take-all system, the lack of a direct correlation between the popular vote and electoral votes, and the unfairness in a tie for the presidency all indicate the Electoral College is outdated and must be abolished. In the current electoral system, the slightest majority in a particular state means all of the votes in that state are given to the candidate that wins the majority.

In document 3, it states that when Alexis de Tocqueville arrived to the United States he said “I was surprised to find so much distinguished talent among the subjects, and so little among the heads of the government.” This states that having common people vote would make sense, and benefit the government. With more people it would also be a benefit because the elections would have a better turnout.

The quote, “After all, sir, we must submit to this idea, that the true principle of a republic is, that the people should choose whom they please to govern them.” (“NY Debates” p.257), shows that there is a strong importance of freedom to the people and that they deserve that freedom granted by the Constitution. There are policies that can and must be changed to perfect the government but first, it must be implemented for the people to choose how they are governed. Citizens above all need the ability to choose who governs them, but that is just the beginning of rights the citizens

They also believed that the Constitution was enough to ensure the people’s rights and that the Bill of Rights was not needed. Of all the positions they argued, the quote “We may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior” is one of the most agreeable statements. This quote states that the new Constitution should not be compared to the structure of government that the Ancient Romans had. The government should be supported by the voice of the people along with representatives that are elected by the people. Another quote by the federalists, “It is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the

The Electoral College was the only way that would still give citizens a

The Government is the ultimate ruler of the people, sets the ultimate laws of the land and says what goes and when not pleased uses all the means in their power to influence. The basic functions of the United States government are listed in the Constitution. Due to the immense power of our federal government, people often argue that it is too powerful and should be lessened. Sub further the state governments use a sum of power to do the same. There has been an effort to shift power from the federal government to the states.

Regular free and fair elections is an example of this. In regular free and fair elections, people get to have a voice in elections. Document 6: Engraving of Virginia’s House of Burgesses says, “This legislature was made up of representative chosen by popular vote. Eventually, every colony in America would have such a legislature.”

The United States Government can be described in two ways. There is unified government, which appears when the President and both houses of congress share the same party. Divided government is the opposite, it occurs when one party controls the white house, and another party controls one or more houses of Congress. A unified government should seem to be more productive because enacting laws would be much easier. A bill has to pass through both houses of congress as well as the president before it can be an official law.

Separation of powers refers to the idea that the major body of a state should be functioned independently and that no individual of a state should have power separately. Therefore, separation of powers means that splitting up of responsibilities into different divisions to limit any one branch from expurgating the functions of another. The intention of the doctrine is to prevent the application of powers and provide for checks and balances of governing a state. It is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government, executive power, legislative power, and judicial power are been kept separately to prevent abuse of power.

1) Government may intervene in a market in order to try and restore economic efficiency. One of the ways the government intervention can help overcome market failure is through the introduction of a price floors and price ceilings. If prices are seen to be too high, price ceiling or a maximum price could be imposed on a market in order to moderate the price of the product. This policy is often used when there are concerns that consumers cannot afford an essential product, such as groceries. The effect of a maximum price could create a shortage as it could lead to demand exceeding supply for that particular good.