Magna Carta Human Rights Analysis

Human rights play a significant part within the health and social care sector. The health care professionals should have knowledge on human rights entitlements and how to deal with any issues that infringes the rights that an individual is entitled too. The professionals should be able to practise in an anti-discriminatory manner that does not contravene anybody’s human

The following Charters have recognized the rights of human beings and have laid the foundation for our current governments proving that they are cherished not only in England or the Western World, but by all men everywhere who believe that only

Since the early 1600s, the colonies had been practicing self-government. With the influence of the British, the American colonies were able to create a representative government. With the rights of its people in mind, the government continues to put in force the policies and laws formed by the colonies. Those policies, formed so long ago by the colonies, have helped to shape and maintain our Constitutional Republic today. The Petition of Right (1628) was England 's most famous Constitutional charter created to extend “the rights of commoners" to have a voice in the government.

Since the ancient times the research of a ‘Just’ society has always been linked with the Natural Law, a corpus of eternal, universal, and immutable rules, as the Nature, valid for everyone. The precursor of the Human Rights can be located in the Natural Rights theorized during the Renaissance humanism. Even if some rights had already been recognized, or affirmed in ancient and previous times, they were strongly connected to some divine power or religion. Nonetheless there are some precedent examples of interest. The Magna Charta signed in 1215 by that King John of England, who committed himself to respect, contained among others in its list , the rights of all free citizens to own and inherit property, to be protected from excessive taxes,

The Australian constitution is a set of rules by which the country is governed, which came into effect on the 1st of January, 1901. The document describes the structure, roles and powers of the Federal Parliament, defining ways in which the State and Federal Parliaments share law-making powers. The roles of the Executive Government and the High Court are also included in the document, and additionally rights of Australian citizens (Parliamentary Education, 2015). Many believe that through the constitution, an economically stable, culturally diverse and democratic nation has been achieved. However, according to some, there are many aspects of the constitution which should be reformed in order to create a document more in tune with modern society

Human rights have been around for as long as we can remember now, but in the recent years they have been really precise. Even with the laws getting stricter, there are many and it is hard to get every single person to do the right thing and be reasonable, in this case to obey and respect human rights. That’s why to this day human rights are not acknowledged to the extent that they should be. While human rights being actualized should be the goal, many countries and people already have disagreements with them. Furthermore, for them to be strict and final for every person would not to be possible any time in the near future as they weren’t in the past.

A few cases of human rights include The right to freedom and chance. The Right to the quest for joy. The right to carry on with our life free of leave-taking Choice Every person ought to be supported to live on choices about their care and support. They should to be given data in a way that they can see so they can pick on expert

Imposition on Human Rights The modern conception of civil liberties involves a long list of individual rights which include the right to liberty and security of person, rights to property and privacy, right to a fair trial and the rights to free speech. These civil and political rights are now framed as “human rights” and are protected by numerous international treaties. Freedom of movement is also broadly recognised in international law and bills of rights. Article 13 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within borders of each state.

Principal United Nations human rights conventions and covenants are treaties, and covenants are agreements, while parties are A group of voters organized for the purpose of influencing governmental policy. The human rights also required an agreement to the 30 rules which Canada agreed

Human rights were initiated for the protection of the basic civil and political liberties in the general public. In the United Kingdom the Human Rights Act of 1998 came into force in October 2000. The aim of the HRA in the UK was to provide further legal effect to the basic rights and freedoms contained in the European Convention of Human Rights. The rights contained in the HRA not only affect essential matters of life and death, but also issues that occur in people 's daily life. Considering the broad range of basic rights covered, it is not astonishing that the HRA is viewed as one of the most significant segments of legislation ever passed in the UK.

Introduction Human rights are rights that are entitled to every individual regardless of nationality and citizenship as it is inherent, inalienable, and universal. The presence of basic human rights are vital in upholding a civilized society. The idea of having individual rights and freedom is not a new concept in Britain, in fact it has very deep roots. History shows landmark advancements such as Magna Carta 1215, Habeas Corpus Act 1679, and Bill of Rights and Claim of Rights 1689 all had important roles in protecting citizen’s rights.

“Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” The journal, “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” by Oonagh Reitman have the aim to know deeper about the two critiques towards the universal Human Rights by the two major theory, which are the Cultural Relativism and Feminism, how they see the universal Human Rights theory. The Journal address for the workshop discussion matter regarding to the similarities on critique of International human rights that made by the Cultural relativist and the feminist. “ Human Rights is the right that given and held by human simply because they are human, and it does not classified nor held by certain groups or not the subject to variation in culture”(Donnelly 1989: 109-110) From the introduction in the journal, the writer defines how the feminist and the cultural relativist express their idea of Universal human rights. The idea of Universal human rights from Donnelly were being reserve by Relativist, they argue that the human rights itself root from culture and due to the variation of culture, making the human rights not universal.

Human rights rest upon two main principles: moral universalism and the belief in existence of a truly universal moral community that includes all human beings. The origins of moral universalism within Europe are accredited to the early philosophers Aristotle and the Stoics. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle came up with the argument in support of the existence of what we call a natural moral order. This natural order is said to be the basis for all truly rational systems of justice that provides a set of comprehensive and acclaimed universal criteria that is said to be capable enough to evaluate the legitimacy of the 'man-made' systems. Aristotle distinguishes between the ‘natural justice' and 'legal justice’ in the following words: “the

Laws are given their particulars from rights. Rights also shape the system of governments. Rights are used in the legal system. Rights also form the organization of morality as it is observed. Rights carry moral power.

The hierarchy of courts of Malaysia begins with the Magistrates’ Court, followed by the Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and finally is the Federal Court of Malaysia. There are generally two types of trials, criminal and civil. The jurisdiction of the courts in civil or criminal matters are contained in the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 and the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Article 121 of the Constitution provides for two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the High Court in Malaya, and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. Thus this creates two separate local jurisdiction of the courts – for Peninsular Malaysia and for East Malaysia.