The Negative Impact Of Treaty Rights On Indigenous People In Canada

There have been constant disputes over land privileges and the discrimination that Aboriginal people have faced

The Aboriginals had original taught the early settlers how to trap and hunt about the land but in the documents associated with the deed and the land transfer, it was written that “Any claims of Indians too compensation for lands required for purposes of settlement shall be disposed of by the Canadian Government and the company shall be relieved of all responsibility in respect of them.”. Instead of the company leaving land for those who had aided them in the beginning. The singled them out due to racism and did not include them in any of the agreements between the HBC and the Crown in which they would receive land for themselves. This could have also contributed to the prejudice against the Aboriginals in future years because during that time period land was equal to power so those without land were treated as the poor and had no say. The deed also affected those who were against poaching and hunting.

“This is our land! It isn’t a piece of pemmican to be cut off and given in little pieces to us. It is ours and we will take what we want.” (voices and visions chapter 8 pg.181, poundmaker in the english tongue) The Cree and many Métis believed that the land was theirs and they were entitled to it.

The Indigenous groups involved in previous treaties found that the government of Canada and Ontario were not living up to their promises and that settlers were encroaching on non-negotiated land in their northern hunting territories. The government then assigned a commission in 1923 that was comprised of Sinclair, McFadden and Williams (Hall, 2011). The treaties were then negotiated as people had already settled on the territory of the eight communities of Indigenous people that were involved. The Williams treaties were comprised of two separate treaties each looking at different land masses, the one directly related to our geographical location being the second signed between the commission and the Mississauga communities, this land stretched from lake Simcoe to the shore of Lake Ontario. The Williams treaty also included the land that was originally within the gunshot treaty, but unfortunately did not include the Mississaugas of New Credit First Nation whose ancestors who were a part of the original treaty.

Justin Trudeau and the Liberal party is determined to creating more opportunity for the indigenous people, and allowing their voices to be heard more throughout Ottawa. Working towards this, the Liberal party will abolish all changes that deter the indigenous people from exercising their voting rights and to ensure that the indigenous people can freely practice their rights. In addition, the Liberal party will guarantee that the Kelowna Accord agreements will be embraced, along with the spirit of reconciliation which drove the agreements. Cognizant of the fact that there is a massive increase in population and inflammation in the First Nation community, the Liberal party will immediately increase the two percent cap on funding the First Nations, creating a community with a sufficient funding. Furthermore, owing to the underfunding of First Nation education system, many First Nation students are being held back in comparison with their provincial peers.

The list of rights included that the Metis should have the same rights as any other Canadian, the protection of their traditions, and equality of the English and

In Australia the Europeans took over all the land that the Aboriginals had owned for over 40,000 years. They had lost their livelihood, living in dumps and small humpies, no where near a safe or healthy environment. The indigenous people were treated very inhumanely; being told where they can go, where they can’t go and who they can have relationships with. Of course they grew extremely angry and something drastic needed to

The story of the development and cultural ethnogenesis of the Metis on the Canadian prairies is one that is rich and has a diverse history. It is a story of resilience, and one of many trails and tribulations. Ultimately is a story that has forever changed the narrative on what was to become Western Canada. The Metis people have undoubtedly played a pivotal role in the development of the Canadian prairies. We can see clearly the effects that the Metis have had in the prairies economically, politically, and culturally.

To First Nation’s people these treaties were agreements or promises to protect their land from newcomers, to secure a new relationship with the British Crown, and to gain a new trading partner. Further, they considered these treaties as being sacred agreements that meant God and the Creator were watching. From their peoples’ perspective, they saw these treaties as promises to receive items from the Crown, such as coats, farm equipment, tools, and livestock. Most importantly, the treaty agreement ensured that the First Nations would not lose power over themselves and to continue to control their institutions, government, laws, and ways of life.

The Aboriginals thought of the treaties as a mean to trade, not to own things. Another major issue and challenge with the numbered treaties were the fact that that there were many verbal promises made to the First Nations that didn't actually happen. These promises are called outside promises and were promises that weren’t actually written on the treaties. Namely, in treaties 1 and 2 First Nations said that the government would aid them in farming

The Métis people knew they had the rights over the land they were living on, but when they petitioned the Canadian governement to receive the rights to their land, the government ignored their request. Because they did not have the title to their land, the government would sale it to

One of the most serious consequences is the loss of Indigenous land rights. The agreement acknowledged Indigenous land ownership and sovereignty, which some Indigenous organizations have exploited in judicial struggles over land rights and title. Furthermore, the proclamation created a precedent for Indigenous peoples' right to be consulted and accommodated in decisions affecting their lands and resources. The proclamation, however, had a devastating impact on Indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples' forcible displacement from their homelands resulted in a loss of traditional knowledge and language, as well as substantial trauma and social dislocation.

The Tsilhqot People have been fighting logging issues since the 1980’s and are still fighting over other issues like mining since 2013 (The Star, Supreme Court Grants Land Title…, 2014). Not only did the Tsilhqot people have property issues arise from resource development but the Haida as well. The Haida Native group in British Columbia also protested and opposed logging on the Queen Charlotte Islands in 1985 (Centre for Native Governance, Haida, 2013). In 1987 the Province of British Columbia signed an agreement to give some land back however, it took six years to complete and during this time frame they continued their developments (Centre for Native Governance, Haida, 2013). Robert William, the Tsilhqot representative in this case, said

Critical Summary #3: First Nations Perspectives In Chapter eight of Byron Williston’s Environmental Ethics for Canadians First Nation’s perspectives are explored. The case study titled “Language, Land and the Residential Schools” begins by speaking of a public apology from former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He apologizes for the treatment of “Indians” in “Indian Residential Schools”. He highlights the initial agenda of these schools as he says that the “school system [was] to remove and isolate [Aboriginal] children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures, and to assimilate them[…]” (Williston 244).

The colonization of Indigenous peoples has dramatically affected their health, and health-seeking behaviours, in a myriad of ways. The Indian Act of 1876 was, in essence, created to control the Indigenous population. The Indian Act laid out laws and regulations that tightly regulated the lives of natives economically, ideologically, and politically. This included a wealth of ways in which their identities were stripped away, and in which they were taken advantage of by the Government of Canada. This has resulted in a reduced quality of life for Canada 's indigenous population, as well as adverse health problems, and prejudicial perceptions that we still see the impact of today.