The Northward Spread Of Horses Among The Comanche Indians

The book I chose to do the book review on is “Conquistadors and Pueblos” by Olga Hall-Quest. The reason I chose this book as my review is because I was very interested in how the Aztecs and the Spaniards handled each other. I am also in the military and Spain’s once powerful army intrigued me. The first chapter of the book was definitely one of my favorites. The origin of name of our beautiful state is briefly explained.

When horse culture first came to the plains, the Lakotas were in fact in a state of crisis and not powerful at all. The bison were disappearing from Lakota lands, and they sought to expand westward, but there were several tribes that stood in their way. The Lakotas were able to steal and buy enough horses eventually that they could have considerable mounted military power. Along with this, the Lakota also can attribute their victories

The article "incredible transformation" written by S. C. Gwyenne, talks about the great transformation of the Comanche between the years of 1625 and 1750. because they started being pariah to be dominant and powerful. When they started to be powerful they never forget what others had done to them. The great change of the Comanche was due to the horse, because it was essential for the hunters.

The Sioux warriors were well armed they fought using a variety of weapons ranging from spears to guns. In the past, they used clubs, tomahawks, shields bow and arrows, spears and axes. Once the Europeans arrived in the Great Plains they brought to the Indians guns and horses to get them around and guns to hunt more efficiently. Individual Sioux warriors took part in warfare for a number of reasons. Plains Indians went on raids and went to war for a number of reasons such as to steal horses, to get revenge or to destroy their enemies.

Identifying the common comparisons in the reviews allows the reader to analyze the structure and arguments in the monograph. A strength that three of the reviews recognize is the depth of research that Hamalainen provides on the Comanche. Recognizing the text’s detailed research, Flores states that its precise history makes it the leading text on the Comanche. Minor writes that Hamalainen’s thesis allows detailed research into the three eras of the Comanche. The rise, peak, and fall of the Comanche, Minor claims allow the readers with a comprehensive understanding of the expanse of the Comanche’s power in the southwest.

In the beginning, the Comanche Native Americans were primarily a hunter-gatherer nomadic society. Dating back to the early 1500's, the Comanche were originally part of the Eastern Shoshone who lived near the upper reaches of the Platte River in eastern Wyoming. Before the Comanches arrived, the Jumano, Pueblo, and Apache Indians had lived in the Southern Plains. The name Comanche comes from the word “kimantzi,” a Ute tribe word meaning enemy.

The difference in the two accounts is the prelude to the battle. According to Lakota Chief Red Horse, he with many Sioux Indians were only moving across the land in attempts to find a place to settle. When they did settle next to the Little Bighorn River, there were many Native Americans with them ten different tribes and eleven including themselves. The account from the military standpoint was the Sioux, and Cheyenne were hostile over the Black Hills and was corresponding with Sitting Bull. From the event of the Sioux Nation on the move, the U.S. Calvary dispatched three units to attack.

This plan brought forth growth and a means to pay for it. This also bright forth in 1970 the Manpower program, this was designed to help train the Choctaws with much needed skills in the working field. Although, the tribe was working and establishing themselves within their tribe, they did gain some outside resources. The tribe today still uses some outside resources (Wood). In order for all this to take place within the tribe and to have a strong leader to help lead them, they would need to vote one in.

Have you ever wondered where different breeds of horses originated from? There are over 350 breeds of horses in the world. They go from two feet tall to roughly seven feet tall. Horses are a very useful animal when it comes to almost anything. About a third of the horses in the world are used for recreational use.

The 1870s, the time after the Civil War, was a decade of imperialism, great invention, reconstruction, labor unions and strikes, and the Sioux Wars. Especially The battle of the little Bighorn, was a crushing defeat for the 7th Cavalry Regiment of the United States Army under George Armstrong Custer. The 700 men strong 7th Cavalry Regiment were defeated by the Lakota, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho, which were leaded by several important war leaders, including Crazy Horse and Chief Gall, Sitting Bull. The reason of the Sioux Wars, and so also of the battle of the little Bighorn, was that the Native Americans fight for their land. The Battle of Little Bighorn was a training point in the relation between America and Native America because

In the late 1500s the Native Americans of the Great Plains got an amazing new tool that would change their place in the world for 200 years. That tool would bring them great wealth and many luxuries, but at the cost of great pain and suffering. That tool they called it the great mysterious dog, we call it the horse . The Native Americans would use this tool to explore ways to transport goods and people. As well as create an opportunity to encounter and exchange with the Spanish and French through trade.

The people on the reservations were “anemic on very few rations” (www.nps.gov). During the 1800s the tribes had been abused by being forced onto reservations with little food and water. Sitting Bull did not go to the reservation because he believed that this was unjust. Sitting Bull encouraged his people and many others to leave the reservation and live traditionally. Therefore Sitting Bull was a great leader when the government show exploitation to not only his people but Indian tribes overall which effected the way the government treats the tribes

The treaty the US government signed with the Indians in 1851 granted the Indians to have an extensive territory, which means the Indians can get more land, but eventually that did not last(doc 3,4). One of the most important and well-known wars was the Sand Creek Massacre. On November 29, 1864, John Chivington led 700 troops in an unprovoked attack on the Arapaho and Cheyenne villagers. There they killed over 200 women, children, and older men. US Indian Commissioner admitted that :We have substantially taken possession of the country and deprived the Indians of their accustomed means of support.”

Class, One reason for the defeat of the Plains Indians was the decline of the buffalo herds, due to the killing by white hunters. The buffalo was one of the most sacred things to the Native Americans, but was their main source of supplies, because they used every part of the buffalo to help them. Second are the former Indian lands being settled by homesteaders, because this reduced the ability of tribes to migrate freely through the plains. This also did not allow the Indians to hunt for more buffalo herds. Lastly was the hostile encounter with the US Army which provided a few victories for the Indian population although Sitting Bull and the Indians fought stunning battles such as the defeat of the US Calvary at Little Big Horn, in the end

Besides, they used them as a means of transport and traded with other Native Americans. These animals were used for sports like horse racing and other activities such as hunting for the dogs. Therefore, this action led to the increase of the animal population and the Native land due to