The right to bear arms is an issue that attracts recurring debate through the ages in America. Debates regarding the availability of guns have always been an issue in the US and firearms regulation activists suggest stricter firearm control while gun rights supporters completely disagree. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution writes “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”, ultimately prevents and restricts gun control. Recently, the high school massacre on the 14th of February in Florida has been extremely confronting. The thought that the nineteen-year-old suspect seemingly just walked into a high school with an extremely powerful AR-15 rifle is horrific. The mass shooting invigorated the discussions around gun control legislation. The victims’ family and friends, who are deeply traumatized, blame the Congress for inaction to prevent shootings. Along with the gun control proponents, they started the “never again” movement to express their deep sorrow and continue to strive for stricter gun control. Understandably, friends and families of …show more content…
The NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre remarked that regulation activists are trying to eliminate individual freedom without “capturing the failure of school security …. even the unbelievable failure of FBI.” Using the second Amendment and the 2008 Supreme Court decision for support, LaPierre commented that stricter gun controls “exploit tragedy for political gain”. Gun rights supporters consider guns useful in self-defense and sports, featuring as a symbol of power and freedom. Stricter gun controls imply they may potentially lose their rights as American citizens. Therefore, in fear of removal of individual freedom, the proposal brought up by regulation activists is extremely
On December 14th, 2012, the lives of thousands, and indirectly millions changed after the shooting of twenty children and six teachers were fatally shot by the infamous Sandy Hook Elementary school shooter, Adam Lanza. This event was so dramatic and sickening the world stopped in it’s tracks waiting for what was going to happen next. In the aftermath of the tragedy, the cauldron was stirred and the underlying question resurfaced; What should we do about gun control laws? Should the people of America even have guns? After a number of shootings occurring and Sandy Hook occurring, Barrack Obama addressed the event and spoke about “reducing gun violence” and promoting “gun safety” drawing many citizens to support his cause.
Passing gun control legislation that creates a universal background check and gun database system as well as passing mental health legislation that improves the health care system’s protocols and policies for assisting people with mental health disorders and that enacts counseling programs in communities and schools will decrease the likelihood of mass shootings in schools. The United States is bitterly divided. Issues of great concern, such as the rise of mass shootings, are partisanized. Both sides of the debate will not comprise or listen to what their opponents have to say. Groups from both sides can only agree that one innocent life taken from gun violence is one too many.
The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.
In 1791 the second amendment was ratified as part of the United States (US) Constitution, A right that its framers gave to the US citizen as a fundamental protection against threats from outside or within. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Young, 2007) Since then Americans have wrapped themselves with this right, even with judicial ruling giving government the ability to limit manufacturing, sales and ownership. But with the last ten year or so the US has experienced some of the worst mass shootings in recorded history. I wish to address the contagion of mass shootings and what actions in legislation have allowed these types of tragic events to unfold.
When it comes to the topic of guns, most of us will readily agree that it is our constitutional right to bare arms. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of as AR platform and assault rifles. Whereas some are convinced that we should not be able to own them, others maintain that we should be able to own assault rifles. The term “assault weapon” is an invention of pro-gun control politicians that demonizes semi-automatic rifles with certain looks.
However, regardless of the original meaning intended by the authors of the Bill of Rights, it is indisputable that gun violence has made today’s American society a threat to itself. The different time ages: 18th Century America and that of 21st Century America is what should be considered prior to making further interpretations as a constitution should be amended accordingly with time in order to be effective. This issue needs to be understood as one that could be resolved up to a great extent with well-planned and strictly enforced laws, rules and regulations that would eventually reduce firearm fatalities while withstanding the conditions of the constitutional rights. ‘A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed’ – The Second Amendment to the
From the beginning of American society to today, the United States has been debating some of the most important topics known to man. One topic that continues to make its way into the everyday lives of Americans is the “Gun Rights vs. Gun Control” argument. Throughout history, the citizens of the United States have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food, and engage in sporting activities. Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate firearms by selecting who can sell, buy, and possess certain guns. Many people, in society today, have questioned whether guns are a helpful tool, or if they are the tools that are causing forms of violence in America, such as suicide.
Since 1982, regulations on an individual’s right to arms have been negotiated. 55 percent of Americans see direct correlation between guns and crimes,but they don’t see the other side of the story. Guns is not what causes these crimes. Because of the real meaning behind the second amendment, the real reason behind mass shootings, and the
The Second Amendment guarantees law-abiding Americans the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. But over time, gun control laws have placed limits on that freedom. Some politicians and gun control proponents argue that these laws are necessary — even at the cost of infringing upon a fundamental American right. But the fact is, gun control doesn’t work the way advocates argue it does. What is Gun Control?
“Another one?” says DJ Khaled as he watches the news reporter talk about yet another mass shooting. Gun control is a serious problem. Many people are coming together and discussing gun control, but nothing is being done to improve it. My paper is about gun control and I will discuss what my topic is over, how gun control has effected people, and what steps are being taken to improve these circumstances.
Gun control- the debate on whether or not there should be laws making it harder to get a gun, more severe background checks, mental health checks, or even banning guns as a whole. Whatever you think, it’s been thought of before. Gun control laws and the idea of gun control itself has been in debate since the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791. Whether or not something will be done about it, is a debate that will likely be around for decades more. Gun control, as defined by Dictionary.com is “government regulation of the sale and ownership of firearms.”
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
The ongoing debate on gun control in America remains a sore topic to some, but an important epidemic to others. With the advancing in school shootings and crime rate in this country, Americans ask the question: Is a stronger gun control something that would help this problem or encourage it? Gun control exhibits the idea that a stronger gun control would demolish a law-abiding citizens’ right, Ignore the fact that Americans have an uncontrollable rage problem, and would benefit criminals. Americans have the right to bear arms and enforce the second amendment. The intent and purpose of the entire Bill Of Rights is to declare individual rights and to circumscribe the powers of federal government.
The Gun Control Debate In recent years, there’s not many topics on the political spectrum that aren’t absolutely polarizing. This essay will attempt to show each side’s generalized opinions, and find flaws in each of their arguments, as every ethical argument has flaws. Analyzing each side will help anyone understand their own opinions better, because without the demonization of the opposite party, ethics get much more difficult. Gun control is everywhere in the news right now, as three months into the year, the country has had12 school shootings in 2018. Exploring the ethics of gun control can get messy and emotional, but it’s important to understand all sides of a subject.
People have the tendency to believe that they should be able to do whatever they want with the gun they own. We do have rights as Americans, but the government defines those rights. For example, it is illegal to shout “FIRE!” in a movie theatre when there is not an actual fire. Yes, under the first amendment, we have the freedom of speech - but the government defines free speech.