The Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline

For my research paper this fall I will be talking about Senator Jon Tester's voting habits on the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone XL Pipeline was a bill passed by the Senate by a vote of 62 to 36. This bill would allow the oil to be ship from Alberta to Illinois and then to Texas to be refined and sold. Jon Tester was one of the sixty-two members who supported the Keystone Pipeline because of its benefit on Montana's jobs and economy. However, Jon Tester has also spoken about how Montana and the United States needs to work towards cleaner energy alternatives.

Despite Donald Trump being elected for president this year, one of his negative intentions was to reopen the project in North Dakota. Unfortunately, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has been granted to complete Dakota Access Pipeline despite the protest of environmentalist and Native Americans. The ideology of North Dakota Access Pipeline is it would become an “economic boon”, and would employ of thousands of jobs. The pipeline shall stretch 1,172 miles through four states such as North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and southern Illinois. Too keep in mind, 470,000 barrels of crude oil would be moved within one day.

The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy

The keystone pipeline has created great debate among the government of the United States and Native American’s living close to where it would be. There have been several attempts by the counter parts to convince the general public what to do. An example of these are the “Reject and Protect” Cowboy and Indian Alliance Anti-Pipeline Ad and the Support Keystone Pro-Pipeline Ad. The Anti-pipeline add starts with images of the Native American’s and Cowboys together. In the background we can hear Native American chants witch could be used to be more sympathetic with the subject.

The pipeline crosses through the water and sacred ground for native tribes such as the Standing Rock Sioux tribe. People argue that if the pipeline goes through water, it could contaminate the water. A solution to this problem could be changing the route or destination of the pipeline so that it will not cross through water or sacred grounds. This will stop protests. It will cost extra money and time, but I believe that with the long term effects that the Dakota Pipeline will provide, it will be worth it.

The Dakota Access Pipeline is a underground oil pipeline. Part of the pipeline is on Native American territory. To get access to the pipeline, burial grounds of the Natives Americans would have to be annihilated, going against the tradition of Native American culture. In the article,”

I think a huge problem in our society is all this talk about the North Dakota Pipeline. In my honest opinion i think it is wrong. There is many people who use the water supply and if something happens with the pipeline it could contaminate the Native Americans water supply. There is many people who count on the water and use it everyday for cooking, cleaning, and drinking. If they go through with the pipeline act it could kill many Native Americans because we need water to survive.

Drilling in Alaska would not solve gasoline and oil problems. This is because in Document C it shows a study that it would only reduce US oil imports by 4%, which means it won't make that

The pipeline stretches about 1,100 miles and is about 90 percent complete. At the uncompleted part of the pipe, protestors have been persistent in voicing their opinions on the matter. The main subject of the protest is the land itself; the land is a little ways away from the Standing Rock Indian Reservation. Presented in a public meeting about the Dakota Access Pipeline, information about soil contamination specific to the area provides proof of destructive pipelines from the past. The land where the unfinished pipeline is part of their ancestor’s homeland and the construction of the pipeline is controversial not only because of the land’s history but also because of previous pipeline spills that caused contamination in the land and soil in May 2015.

To the Canadian government, as well as some of the residents of the land that the pipeline would have passed through, there was more at stake. Perhaps the best summary of the prevailing political view of the development of energy resources in Canada 's north was Prime Minister John Diefenbaker 's slogan “Roads to Resources”. The pipeline could be viewed as a result of this mentality, with the state providing both infrastructure and incentives to encourage private development, and the end goal being both increased economic productivity and a stronger Canadian presence in the north (Abele, 2011 ). Local residents who supported the construction of the pipeline believed that its construction would lead to long-term economic development in the area, with construction jobs and the existence of the infrastructure leading to growth in a part of Canada where many still lived off the land and had a very low measurable level of economic productivity. However, the Berger inquiry that eventually resulted in the project not proceeding projected relatively little economic benefit for residents of the area.

“Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands,

Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no

TAPS transports 17% of the United State’s domestic petroleum. If the pipeline were to stop, “A loss of that production would increase prices by at least 10 to 16 percent” (Balan). This is very important, as the majority of the American population is in constant need of these resources. A shift this dramatic in the economy would lead to outrage and possible changes in economic inflation. All in all, the Trans Alaska pipeline has provided for a great number of people and has not failed to let them down.

People depend upon gasoline more than ever today to get around to where they need to go. Worldwide we need gasoline to power the trains, the cars, semis, and ships that carry us to work, to school, and bring our food to the supermarkets. What if one day people woke up to find there was a gasoline shortage not just locally but all across the United States? As the US watched the price of gasoline climb higher than ever over the last fifteen years, it was a big relief to everyone when gasoline prices began to drop to where they are today. This is not something new that threatens the United States.

Oil can do some things that people would have not normally thought of. It can build cities and and raise the pay, but it can also open up opportunities for some. When Texas discovered oil within a few years there was towns that popped up one year with thousands of people, people left to work in the oil fields and their old jobs were available and were well paying, and when people have open plots of land they sometimes drilled for oil and made a lot of money for various uses. In the year of 1925 Wink Texas was not even on the map much less a city.