Urban Gentrification

Brooklyn has been known to be more than just a borough. It has been known and accredited for being a community of peers. Despite the difference in areas, and environment Brooklyn is a place where people intend to look out for one another. However, some people had their own beliefs about Brooklyn itself and felt only “Poor people live in Brooklyn” (Mehta, pp1) however this is not the case. Just as Adam Bonislawski’s article “Is the New Brooklyn Economy For Real?” stated that the “New Brooklyn Economy” was in fact a place where it welcomed the passion driven, tech savvy and entrepreneurialism of the new era.

The average price of the condos on the waterfront went from $219,000 to $200, 000 in the past few months (Seward pg.2, 2015). This decrease in housing prices is not common, though. It is found that when gentrification occurs, the average rents in a neighborhood rises. This is due to new renters who come to these neighborhoods who can afford to pay higher rents which raises the rent (ICPH pg.2, 2009). Resultantly, this causes people to move due to the increased rent.

Gentrification is used by the government as a porssess which ensures that areas of social and economic underprivileged residents experience significant transformation through initiatives such as investments, developments and demographic change. These changes are notably beneficial for certain individuals compared to others, but specifically favourable towards the government and those of higher income families. Due to state-led gentrification these certain individuals of the area and the government receive benefits in several ways including an increase on the price of property and tax revenue, improved economic opportunities and overall neighbourhood improvements. Since the renewal to make these areas of low income residents more appealing to those of a higher income, property values and tax prices collected by the government have significantly increased. This is evidently seen through the rent and property increase within suburbs of Sydney where these economic pressures from the government have been put in placed due to the rise in affluent buyers in ceratin neighbourhoods.

These impacts caused by direct state-led gentrification can lead to negative effects on the locals and the relationships between each other. Due to the rise in expenses of living in neighborhoods experiencing gentrification, residents may find it demanding to pay for their basic needs such as housing which can ultimately lead to displacement from their property. Residents often find that the more affordable housing for them in the neighborhood becomes inadequate or overcrowded causing them to move to areas that have not been affected by state-led gentrification, therefore cheaper but further away from their original home. In an area undergoing gentrification, private renters especially, have a lack of control over the untenable level increase of rent causing the eviction of current residents to be able to renovate properties that will attract high-income residents who are in a position to pay the increased prices. This process of gentrification is labeled as second-wave gentrification which is developed by the state government's decisions, involves the construction of new houses on redeveloped sites, and creates a demographic mix of the upper and lower class (Bounds & Morris, 2006).

This exact comment captures what gentrification can be about. Not so much the rent, the landlord harassing the tenants and working class displacement but about nearby bars and cool cafes, the whole social range. The study of gentrification seems to be taking a turn, rather than being focused on why people sought interest in it to begin with; the evictions and social class struggle of a neighborhood. Beginning a web page about gentrification but not knowing much on how to go about it, Slater put up his knowledge for all to see. Going through working class displacement, his story brought others to share theirs.

In order to understand our statistical data, we must first accurately grasp the definitions of gentrification and displacement. Gentrification means a demographic or physical change that conforms to the middle class. The financial definition of middle class means that a single individual or household makes between $50k-120k annually. Uniquely, displacement is the removal of something or someone by something else that takes their place. In our case, looking at gentrification in the San Francisco area within the last 10 years will possibly birth an explanation as to why Artist displacement is/was on the rise.

Wealth is one of the factors why residential segregation is an increasing problem. Golash- Boza explains, “Residential segregation happened when different groups of people are sorted into discount neighborhoods” (271). It is because of housing segregation

Neoliberalization’s propagation of health inequity in urban rebuilding processes and social movements against them: Baltimore’s story This essay will discuss how neoliberal processes during redevelopment sustain and increase health inequities. It will highlight key neoliberal processes in urban redevelopment and examples of their impact on economic, political, and institutional social capital and subsequent public health effects. Examples of social movements challenging several neoliberal processes will be provided as one path toward changing the roots of health inequities. Introduction Too often neighborhoods which have been historically disinvested and demonized become prime real estate targets for development with the expectation

Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste. Real Estate investors usually take low-income places that they feel have a chance to prosper economically, and turn them into areas that attract the middle and upper class workers. In doing so they feel like the low-income areas will be safer and more appealing, attracting more people to visit and live there. An improvement to a poor district sounds beautiful, but is gentrification as great as it’s sought out to be? Many residents have their doubts about gentrification due to the idea that the costs of their living will go up and they will be driven out of their neighborhoods.

There has to be a realistic solution that can be put into motion to benefit everyone involved. Referring again to his article “Is Gentrification All Bad?” Davidson argues that urban renewal, if done right, is not a monstrous custom that it is painted to be; nevertheless, he reasons that gentrification depends on who does it, how they do it, and why they do it. As a resident in New York, a city where gentrification is as widespread as the common cold in winter, Davidson speculates that those who go into a neighborhood with the intention to renovate houses, or abandoned buildings ought to have a good reason for it. The author points out that “Gentrification does not have to be something that one group inflicts on another…” (Davidson 349), rather, he suggests that everyone, the gentrifiers and the locals, be on the same page when it comes to developing their

Bennie calls it “the takeover (70)” in the book. Gentrification is what its called when wealthy people and businesses move to low income areas and rebuild and move in and push out the low income businesses and families because this change makes it more expensive for families to live there. “The place that Sierra and Bennie used to get there hair done had turned into a fancy bakery of some kind, and yes, the coffee was good, but you couldn’t get a cup for less then three dollars. Plus everytime Sierra went in, the hip, young white kid behind the counter gave her either the don’t cause no trouble look or the I want to adopt you look(70).” While Izzy enjoys sitting in the new, expensive coffee shops and writing poetry, the threat in the changing culture is shown when Sierra is chased through the streets by spirits and no one in the white neighborhood will help her because they assume about her and think the worst of her for being

During the 1960s, middle and upper-class populations began to move out of the suburbs and back into urban areas. Areas such as Harlem, Washington Heights and Brooklyn have deeply been affected by it. Gentrification has variable type of impact like many positive changes as a better-looking neighborhoods, more job opportunities as well as a reduction in crime rates in those areas, but with these positive changes negative results for others within the community will be affected such as displacement and rent increase which forced people to move out. Despite its positive impact which mainly affect the new incomers, gentrification seems to be better because of the positive results for the community since its main purpose is to benefit the community

Issue: Within the last decade, San Francisco has dramatically changed. San Francisco’s working class people and poor neighborhoods underwent drastic economic and racial changes from the 1990s to mid 2000s, resulting in the undeniable gentrification of the districts. San Francisco’s gentrification has reached a ridiculous new extreme, making it the most expensive city in the country, outstripping even Manhattan. The beginning of the issue was right after the dotcom and Tech industries started drastically moving to the Bay Area.

Affordable housing is housing created for people who have a certain median household income labeled as “affordable” by a local government. During the early 2000s, housing prices has started to rapidly increase, but the question is why? “Over the last decade, average rents have climbed 15%” (Ennis, 2016), becoming unaffordable for a numerous of reasons. One being the demand for apartments is high, but the supply is low. The land, where apartments are built on, is becoming limited (Rampell, 2013).

Thomas Hardy once said, “If a path to the better there be, it begins with a full look at the worst.” In this case the worst is suburbia, it cased oil depletion and the collapse of the American Dream. life in the suburbs has it`s good and bad moments. American love suburbia, because it has promised space, affordability, convenient, family life, and upward mobility. More than half of the population have moved to suburbs; as they move sprawl explodes so too the suburban way of life.