Ronald Watts, 48 years old, a District tactical sergeant, and a patrol officer named Kallatt Mohammed, 47 years old, were both parts of the 2nd District tactical team in the Chicago Police Department. On the eve of February 13, 2012, both officers were formally charged in the U.S. District Court of Chicago by the Northern District of Illinois United State Attorney, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, with government funds theft. Mr. Watts was an 18-year police veteran and Mr. Mohammed was with the Chicago PD for 14 years. Their arrest was due to unseal complaints of police criminal misconduct by two whistleblower officers, Shannon Spalding and Daniel Echeverria , followed by a thorough investigation of, special of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert D. Grant and the police department’s Internal Affairs Division. The …show more content…
CS5) were involved in analogous transactions, the affidavit showed that both former Chicago PD officers instructed the federal informant, in a recorded conversation to call them or go to a specific gas station that they stated and ask for them whenever CS5 was ordered to transport drug monies for the traffickers. Facts proved that former police officers Ronald Watts and Kallatt Mohammed extorted several thousand dollars in cash from various drug couriers for years in exchange for police protection in the South Side housing projects area in Chicago. "Watts receives weekly payments from drug dealers," stated FBI agent Robert D. Grant in the sworn in affidavit that concluded the investigation. "These payments are typically in the amount of $5,000." Furthermore, according to court records, CPD Officer Ronald Watts and his Chicago Police Department tactical team victimized the Ida B. Wells housing complex residents for several years and wrongfully convicted more than 15 victims
Krasimira Schrib ACTG 441 Brief Duberstein v Commissioner and Stanton v. the United States Facts: Duberstein v Commissioner Duberstein was a president of Duberstein Iron and Metal Company. He did business with Berman, who was president of Mohawk Metal Corporation for approximately 7 years. Occasionally Berman asked Duberstein for referrals for new customers, which Duberstein provided. The provided information was very helpful for Berman’s Company, so in act of gratitude Berman, gave Duberstein a new Cadillac as a gift.
The Supreme Court case, Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 4242 (1971) was argued on December 14, 1970 (Justia Law, 2017). This case was brought to the legal system by Negro employees who believed they were being discriminated against by their employer. The Duke Power Plant in question was its Dan River Steam Station, were they had 95 employees and 14 of said employees were Negros and of this number only 13 were petitioners. Essential Duke had organized its plant into five operating departments: Labor, Coal Handling, Operations, Maintenance, and Laboratory and Test (Anon, 2017).
There were many court cases that were discussed in class regarding the mob versus the individual. The most important ones were the United States v. Schwimmer, Roe v. Wade, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, and Brown v. Board of Education. In all but one of the cases above, the Mob (the government) used its power to stop the individual from pursuing their American dream. The individual was right in all of the cases because they had the right to express themselves and pursue their dream; and the government had to right to stop them from following it. Starting with the Schwimmer case, the individual was right because the government was not giving her a valid reason as to why they were denying her citizenship.
Marbury versus Madison was one of the most controversial court cases in the Supreme Court history. The overall decision of the court case was a landmark decision that would carry on into setting up boundaries between the executive and judicial branches of government. The case was brought to trial on February 11, 1803 and the final decision was made February 24, 1803. The case included William Marbury and James Madison. Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to be the Justice of the Peace.
The Supreme Court of the United States explains that parents have the fundamental right to direct the education and upbringing of their children (Nicole and Garnett 2000). The Supreme Court has upheld the protection of parental rights to educate their children with literacy skills and religious doctrines within their home or community. In the case of Wisconsin v. Yoder in 1972, the Court recognized “parents’ fundamental right to freely exercise religion” (“Wisconsin v. Yoder”). Therefore, no federal law prohibits parents to give religious instruction to their children, neither a federal law that prohibits parents to give religious instruction to their children. Parents’ rights to instruct their children “constitutes as a basic norm…in a particular
Corporation counsel of the City, Zachary W. Carter also claimed that the police and detectives did what they could with the evidence they had and “acted reasonably.” But looking further at the case back in 1989, it is extremely clear that the officials working the case made decisions based on race and chose the easiest
The heavily armed sniper who gunned down police officers in downtown Dallas, leaving five of them dead, specifically set out to kill as many white officers as he could, officials said Friday. He was a military veteran who had served in Afghanistan, and he kept an arsenal in his home that included bomb-making materials. The gunman turned a demonstration against fatal police shootings this week of black men in Minnesota and Louisiana from a peaceful march focused on violence committed by officers into a scene of chaos and bloodshed aimed against them.
with this view of the period from 1954 to 1968? Historians debate whether the Supreme Court had more influence on the African American civil rights struggle than any other branch of government; many have opposing views on whether the Supreme Court played the most important role in the African American civil rights struggle. Historian Stephen Tuck (2010) stated in his book it was that leading figures in the black civil rights movement that drove congress into enacting legislation and were the driving force in bringing change to America, not branches in government (Tuck, 2010). Revisionist Michael J. Klarman believed that “the S.C was not fundamental in the changing of civil rights as the Brown V Board of Education lacked clarity and any judicial
October 2nd, 2002 was the start of a long and horrific three weeks in the Washington DC Metropolitan Area. People were terrified to be in the area and everyone was on edge. What appeared to be random killings, turned out to be a well-organized series of senseless shootings that took the lives of ten innocent people. After days of people being scared to death and much confusion, investigators discovered that there were two suspects in the shootings; John Allen Muhammad and his teenage partner Lee Boyd Malvo and they were in a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan designed to terrorize people. This break in the case came when one of the suspects called the tip hotline and told them to look into a murder in Alabama, which lead to the case being
Police corruption has been the largest ongoing problem in the United States criminal justice system. In the documentary, “The Seven Five” directed by Tiller Russell, he sheds light onto the story of former NYPD officer Michael Dowd and how he and his prescient were involved in committing numerous crimes, including running their own cocaine ring while on the job in the 1980’s, early 90’s. Per the Criminal Law- Lawyer Source, police corruption is defined as “the abuse of police authority for personal gain or to gain advantage for the police organization. Police corruption can take the form of a variety of criminal activities ranging from actual commission of serious criminal (i.e. drug trafficking and money laundering) to the instances where
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI Agent) Associate Dean once said “It just dispelled all of the bad things I’d ever heard about the FBI… that the FBI was sneaky and out to get people.” The career of the FBI agent is a remarkable and exciting career, because of the endless possibility of helping the world get better in any kind of way . The research will describe the career of Federal Bureau of Investigation , what is required to become a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent a successful career and the impact this career has on has on society.
Karla Coronel Chapter 20 Problems 6) In my opinion the director is not responsible for the destroyed antiquity. For the following reasons: The agent's careless actions were not within his job. If the agent acts negligently out of his employment with the principal, the principal is not liable for damages caused by the actions of the agent.
Throughout the whole investigation of the Gail Miller rape and murder case there were many wrongs committed leading up to the false conviction of David Milgaard. The authorities were pressured by the public and other groups to convict someone of this heinous crime and in doing so this action of theirs put an innocent man behind bars for twenty-three years. Right from the start of the investigation there were faults and incorrect procedures perpetrated by the police. The events that took place leading up to the conviction of Mr. Milgaard demonstrate just how sloppy the investigation took a turn when the police became lax in their investigational procedures.
The Aryan Brotherhood, The Aryan Brotherhood (also known as the Brand) is a white male prison gang that was organized in 1964 at California's San Quentin maximum security prison and It was founded by white supremacists Barry Mills and Tyler Bingham . The gang was formed initially as a racial hate group for the purpose of intimidating nonwhite inmates. Over the course of several decades, the gang spread to other California prisons, prisons in other states, and federal prisons.