World War Dbq Essay

What path should the allied powers have gone down in order to create a world peace? Would the world consist of less poverty? How would world history and economy be different from how it is today? Nations opposing Adolf Hitler should have used collective security to potentially stop a world war. Three reasons why opposing nations should have used collective security is because if Hitler were appeased, then he would continue to imperialise other nations.

Britain Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain had all but forfeited the European mainland to Nazi Germany. Eventually, Hitler continued to take over land and grow his popularity in Germany as well as his power. For Example, Hitler became Führer of Germany after German President Hindenburg dies on August 2 1934. (HistoryPlace.com) After years of Hitler’s growth as a dictator in Germany, the idea of expansionism was a recurring idea.

One of the most important factors of a leader being successful at war is having strong support from their home front and Adolf Hitler used this to his advantage a multitude of times during his reign as chancellor of Germany through the use of propaganda. One example of this was on September 1st, 1939 when Adolf Hitler ordered a blitzkrieg attack at Germany’s eastern border, unto Poland. This act he knew, would trigger a declaration of war from England. On the same day as the attack “The New York Times” reported Hitler as to have said “Germans in Poland are persecuted with a bloody terror and are driven from their homes. The series of border violations, which are unbearable to a great power, prove that the Poles no longer are willing to respect the German frontier.”

1939 marked the start of World War II in Germany, quickly spreading throughout Europe. Germany, Italy, and Japan made enemies with the United States, England, and France, who became known as the Allied Forces. The war was initiated by the actions of German dictator, Adolf Hitler, whose goal was to conquer the world for his own personal gain. Hitler was a communist who had the unique ability to persuade nations into joining him in his beliefs and actions, which resulted in the deaths of millions of people for their religious views and cultures. The United States remained neutral from 1939-1941.

When the Treaty of Versailles was set in place, a loosely defined area called the Rhineland was to be unoccupied. Again, Hitler violated the treaty and sent his military into the Rhineland. The other nations could have been blinded and didn’t notice that Hitler slowly eased his way into more and more areas in which were neutral or were to be left alone. If other countries would have responded to this, it would have changed Hitler 's view on how vulnerable and weak the other nations are. Not only this, but Hitler explained his movement as a “return to European collective cooperation.”(doc.

Although the Treaty of Versailles was meant to end the war, the treaty caused more problems like, the treaty took some of Germany's land, tried to control germany's military, and set blame to just one country. All of these things that the treaty caused, helped cause World War II. The Treaty of Versailles took away some of Germany's land and this caused people of germany to get angry. The treaty took away many coal producing areas away from Germany (Doc A), which caused Germany to be poorer.

Chamberlain followed a policy of appeasement with Hitler in order to keep peace and avoid any future potential conflict from occuring. The three points that exemplify the reason as to why Chamberlain appeased Hitler, all indicate that Chamberlain’s Britain saw appeasement as the best possible approach towards Hitler’s radical German regime. In the period after World War 1, nations across Europe began to build and strengthen themselves in order to gain the collective security of their nation as well as international prestige and superiority. The recently signed Treaty of Versailles severely punished Germany for the damage it had caused. When Germany began to grow and expand, breaking the rules established by the Treaty of Versailles, international leaders such as Neville Chamberlain believed in a policy of appeasement because they thought that Germany was simply trying to recover from all that was taken away from them.

The Machiavellian philosophy of “it is best to be loved AND feared; if you can’t be both, then be feared.” applies to Adolf Hitler because he was both feared and loved. After WW1, Germany was in bad shape and when Hitler came and assured the people recovery, they could not refuse. In return Hitler brought down the unemployment in Germany from 7 million to only 1 million in 12 months.

The powers now knew that Germany was secretly rearming so they also began to remilitarize. The disarmament struggled for a whole year in the background before completely failing and ending in

Appeasement would have been the right decision if it had worked out equally between the countries . Everything that has its positive side, also has its negative side and it was the same situation with appeasement. There are mainly 3 disadvantages of appeasement which are appeasers misjudged Hitler , Appeasement was morally wrong and finally appeasers missed a lot of chances to stop hitler . The appeasers misjudged Hitler, appeasement was morally wrong and finally the appeasers missed excellent chances to stop hitler .

Which was 1 an agreement between France, Italy, Nazi Germany, and Britain. [Since] Germany invaded the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, the British and French prime ministers tried to get Hitler to agree not to use his military in the future in return for the land he had taken.   This act was unsuccessful as Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia, then this led Britain and France to declare World War II. Another cause of World War II was Fascism. Since the World War I left the economy a mess, countries were being taken over by dictators, as these dictators looked for new lands to conquer.

As a result, one can deduce that the Appeasement policy agreed between Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler was both a feasible and non-feasible approach from both sides; both having pros and cons and different results if they acted differently towards the policy. In the eyes and views of many historians and analysts of World War II and Neville Chamberlain’s Appeasement policy with Adolf Hitler, many say that the appeasement was the right choice during the inter-war period because it was “based on traditional perceptions of foreign interests and a rational assessment of military means and political will.” REF The people of Great Britain did not want to suffer another war, having already been hit harshly from World War I, hence, allowing the cabinet to use terms of negotiation with Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and form some sort of “peace” between one

Overconfidence: By the time of World War II, Hitler have already secured most of the Europe land and all these started with the destruction of the Treaty of Versailles(TOV). He broke off these chains that held him back by leaving the League of Nations. After that, he started to get ready his army and armory required for him to invade his desired countries through the Anglo-German Naval Agreement in 1935, which allowed Germany’s Kriegsmarine total tonnage to be 35% of the Royal Navy’s tonnage, and by remilitarising in the Rhineland in 1936, disregarding the restriction of army forces as stated in the TOV. He demanded the annexation of Austria under the Anschluss claim and Czechoslovakia under the Munich agreement in 1938.

Neville Chamberlain used many policies when it came to deciding on how to deal with Hitler. One of the main policies he pursued was appeasing Hitler. Chamberlain was a pacifist and didn’t want war so many historians believe that he used appeasement to prevent another world war. Other Historians believe he used appeasement because Britain wasn’t ready to go to war and so he was buying time so the country could prepare for war. Finally, other historians believe that he used appeasement because he wasn’t a good leader in general and that he was a pushover and was just giving in to Hitler’s demands.

Adolf Hitler’s main move kicked off with the need to do away with the Versailles treaty (n.p, ‘New American Nation’, n.d.). He sued this in his campaign speeches to woe the German nationals. He talked of the toil this had had on its economies as well as frustrating it armament efforts. Upon getting into power in 1933 after being elected as Germany’s chancellor, he did away with any conformity to the treaty (n.p, ‘Hitler Comes to Power,’ n.d.). Germany was up again on its feet economically as well as subsequent armament efforts in a bid to restore Germany to its prior position of being the World’s respected and most powerful super power.