NASA Essays

Ezekiel Forsythe English 9 Ms. Zitka April 20, 2023 NASA: Federal or Privatized? The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has played a pivotal role in American space exploration, scientific research, and foreign policy ever since its inception in 1958. Spectacular achievements, including human space travel during the Mercury Missions, earth orbit during the Gemini Missions, and lunar landings during the Apollo missions have shaped how our society views spatial exploration and research

According to the United States government website on spending, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was allocated $32.35 billion of the U.S. budget, a statistic which has been increasing each of the past 5 years and is planned to continue increasing—by 6%, going into 2024 (Dreier). Space exploration is a venture which is indubitably accompanied by a wide variety of implications. The practice requires great amounts of funding, and, thus, has the potential to stir large amounts

NASA has been budgeted $526.18 billion, which is an average of $9.928 billion per year, from 1958 to 2011. That hardly compares to the $370 million funded on only Endangered Species Act. Although this is a considerable amount of funding for the ES Act, but much of these expenses fail to achieve a significant impact that the organization for the ES Act would like to get done. Many national organizations need to be funded in order to make an impact on the Earth that humans live on. The governments

people, has had its budget slashed. According to Goldstein (2007), NASA was originally created to beat the Soviet Union in the Space Race has taken on many different roles. In an article for NASA’s website, J.R. Wilson (2008) uses Dr. Michael DeBakey, a heart surgeon, as an example of someone who felt the benefit of NASA’s wide research scope. Dr. DeBakey now uses a heart pump in surgerys, invented because of the research done by NASA (Wilson, 2008). One of NASA’s many inventions that directly improve

NASA takes part in the research of aerospace and aeronautics. NASA has impacted the technology we use today through the creation of innovative tools used in space research that are applied into the everyday lives of people. NASA has existed for over 50 years achieving their goals and conquering challenges. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration was the result the “Sputnik Crisis.” The Sputnik Crisis was a “period of public fear and anxiety of a perceived technological gap between the

firefighters use to put out fires with and the space blankets to cover runners with after races. Both were designed for NASA to use in missions. Patrick Marshall stated, “The United States has long encouraged private contractors to participate in space programs, developing products according to NASA specifications.” These privately contracted companies used to develop these technologies for NASA are the same companies found on drugstore shelves selling these products to us for our own use. Marshall continued

1960’s the budget for NASA was the largest it has ever been. The 2015 budget was the lowest it has been since Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped on the moon. Instead of taking money away from NASA the government should be giving more to them and allowing them to expand and collaborate. Many independent groups have risen up to take the reigns on aerospace development, such as Blue Origin and SpaceX. These companies can only have access to so much. With the experience of NASA and their in depth

NASA’s funds should not be cut because of its direct impact in our daily lives, the economy and reputation of NASA. As mentioned previously by President John F. Kennedy, “No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.” Even though the U.S. government is in the midst of a financial crisis, they need to look at the bigger goal. If the government does not increase

Re-engaging the Public in Space Exploration According to NASA, the upcoming film “The Martian” may re-engage the public with space travel. The film, an adaptation from Andy Weir’s eponymous book, gives the agency hope that people might once again be interested in space missions, much like 2001: A Space Odyssey did in 1968. NASA Wants a Man on Mars as Much as We Do NASA hasn’t presented many manned missions since 1974, instead focusing in the International Space Station and a $150 billion shared laboratory

I’m am going to tell you what people are going to do in the future. NASA is trying to make new developments to their research by exploring more of space. One way that they will do that is by trying to send people to Mars. Another place they want to send people is to an asteroid. The spaceship that is going to Mars has to be the best. It will hold four astronauts. Its name is the NASA Orion spacecraft. To help make sure that the spaceship works , they will send the Orion up to take an asteroid that

“Mrs.Hamilton isn’t there anything I can do to help you guys” I Had been begging Margret if I could help with the launch since I had first become an intern at the NASA station. July 1969 it was going to be the most memorable day in history. The day man walked on the moon. It was the 19th and the boys would be on the moon tomorrow. And all I could do was get lunch and coffee. Margaret was the most reasonable. But she was still very hard headed. “No Brenda you’re just an Intern you shouldn’t even have

Some of the possibilities NASA has for Mars are, as the article says, “plans for radiation shielding, centrifugal artificial gravity, in-transit consumable resupply, and a return-lander.” (Williams) This quote explains a few possibilities of how NASA could colonize Mars. Any of these possibilities could potentially work in the future. An advantage humans have with Mars colonization is that the days are similar. “A Martian day is 24 hours and 39 minutes, which means that plants and animals – not

exploring the reasons as to why the U.S government should fund NASA, it is first necessary to observe what percentage of people think that NASA’s budget should be raised and why they do so. According to Thompson (2013), “76 percent of Americans agree that NASA’s budget should be increased to 1 percent of the total federal budget to fund initiatives, including a mission to Mars” (p.1). There are two reasons behind supporting the funding of NASA. Firstly, the main reason as to why people support space activities

Underfunding NASA NASA’s huge budget cuts since the 70’s are no secret to anyone[1] , it has only been this low during its founding years. Yet most politicians and citizens still suggest more cuts, or even the elimination of the program. People have been talking about our declining economy, flawed political system, and unemployment rates. As such; some have looked at space exploration as an expensive, unneeded burden. However, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration is one of the greatest

is more danger we are being put in by having all this new technology and not knowing how to use it then there are pros. NASA Earth Observatory states that anyone can get pictures from satellites, people think they know everything going on, and conversation issues. Firstly, I believe that the cons outweigh the pros in the sense that anyone can get satellite images online. NASA Earth Observatory states “ in the mid 1980s, I would have given my eye-teeth to get satellite images of Madagascar.” Assuming

Government funding of NASA On July 29, 1958, the United States government found the National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA beat the Soviet Union in the space race. President JFK gave them the challenge of sending a man on the moon and return him home safely, this challenge not only provided motivation, but united the country for a common goal. Over the years NASA has been a crucial part of our lives and gave us things like mass communication, satellite entertainment, and most importantly

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was established by the United States government in 1958 for the purpose of developing vehicles and activities for the exploration of space. Five program offices comprise NASA: Aeronautics and Space Technology for development of equipment, Space Science and Applications for understanding the origin and evolution of the universe, Space Flight for manned and unmanned space transportation, Space Tracking and Date for tracking and data acquisition,

It is within our best interest as humans to continue to support the space programs. NASA has several space programs that have contributed significantly to scientific research, technological advancements, and our understanding of the universe. There are three major , and these are the ‘real’ human reasons, the fact that NASA significantly benefits the U.S economy, and the fact that space exploration contributes to politics. I have further explained these reasons deeper in this essay. Before reading

The NASA Moon Landing Conspiracy The conspiracy of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, better known as NASA, Moon Landing has been around for decades. Ever since this event occurred in 1969, there has been speculation. The world watched the live T.V broadcast in awe as Neil Armstrong became the first man to set foot on the surface of the Moon. People brought the belief of film making to the landing, the pictures sent back from Apollo 11 were found unruly, and when the crew returned

whether or not the funding for the National Aeronautics and space administration should be continued. Although it may seem like a simple fix, it has proved to be one of NASA’s greatest and most difficult challenges yet. In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s