Environment is a person 's surrounding conditions and circumstances at a specific time, which influences that person 's behavior. In selection from Hard to Get: Twenty Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom Leslie bell writes about how pressure from the environment shapes young women 's behavior and puts them in a contradictory position about their sexual rights. Pressure from community and society lead young women to splitting which results in unconsciously creating two or more distinct lifestyle and thinking that they can only choose one way or the other. Malcolm Gladwell in his essay The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City writes about how environment shapes an individual 's behavior and how it …show more content…
Too much power or freedom causes an internal conflict of choices of lifestyle and eventually lead to splitting between pursuing goal versus taking the freedom to extreme. When the environment offers too much freedom or power, individual lose their identity and gets owned by the notion of freedom or power. The power of freedom have so much influence on individuals that sometime those powers dictate their wishes and choose the choices of lifestyle for them. Jayanthi, one of the interviewees of Bell, is from a conservative American-Indian family who had great pressure from her background and specially had to follow strict rules about sexual relation. However when she moved to college and say the light of freedom everything she valued had changed. Jayanthi said that “I’m just going to break them. So I just broke them. So I ended up really going crazy…I was just like “I don’t want to be the poster Child, so the other extreme is this.”, when she realizes that she had option to be free (Bell 33). Jayanthi was oppressed by the strict rules of her family and culture. So when opportunity of freedom came she was happy to embrace it. Although she had the freedom to follow her goals and dreams, however, the power of freedom was so much tempting that it led her to splitting. She had the option to choose the lifestyle she will enjoy or she can take her freedom to extreme. She decided to misuse her freedom and tried to go extreme in the lifestyle of a bad girl. Correspondingly, freedom of power can over power the will of being good. Gladwell writes about one of the guards, who said that “there were times when we were pretty abusive, getting right in faces and yelling at them” one guard remembers “ It was part of the whole atmosphere of terror”. As the experiment progressed, the guard got systematically crueler and more sadistic”(Gladwell 158). The freedom of power was so influential that the guard forgot his real identity and started to act like a real guard. The power led them to
Essential question: How does environment shape who we are? The enviorment we grow up in has a big influence on who we become. The people around us like our friends and family often determin our opinions and difrent veiws on things. Our parents raise us with their opinons and their veiws, we tend to belive things similar to the belifes of who we are raised by. They pass on their religious belifes or how they dont belive in religon, what political party they vote for, and certin things they have opinions on.
Experiences with people, places and/or things, shape and affect an individuals choices, either to strengthen or break connections and relationships. Through past and new memories and experiences, we are able to reflect, assess and explore our owns concept of connections. There are however, obstacles and barriers one must meet to fully understand our selves and the complicated world of connections and belongingness. The environment or culture we are exposed in since we were infants for instance, greatly affects our identity- behaviour, values and actions- as we get older. Imagine two people from different countries, one grew up in Cambodia and the other grew up in the US.
One of the theories that can explain this is Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory. This theory states that development reflects the influence of several environmental systems. There are five environmental systems that are identified within the theory. The microsystem is the setting of an individual, the mesosystem involves relationships and connections between the microsystem and contexts, the exosystem includes links between the social setting in which the individual does not have an active role and the immediate context, the macrosystem involves culture, and the chronosystem consists of patterns and transitions during the life course (Santrock
One’s environment plays a positive or negative role in shaping a person’s identity depending on where they live. Growing up in a bad neighborhood, one might be surrounded by gangsters, dangerous streets, and have a higher chance of becoming a burden on society. Growing up in a rich neighborhood, one might worry less and get whatever they want; so life is not a burden. But being exposed in a poor environment shapes one’s identity positively by motivating a person to grow and evolve for the better. Experiencing sufferings in an environment may inspire a person to change for the better.
Milgram himself concluded how easily ordinary people ‘can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority". (Milgram 1974) As this report has highlighted the research is not without controversy with many questioning to what extent Milgram’s experiment is true to real life and has been criticized for not highlighting further situational variables in determining obedience to authority. Regardless of this, there is no doubt Milgram highlighted a rather troubling phenomenon.
Freedom, as defined in the Merriam-Webster 's Dictionary, is the quality or state of being free. This means by the root word itself, it is when a human experience being free. However, there are plenty of other definition of freedom and not just by being free itself. In this paper, I will be talking about freedom in relation to my chosen topic, feminism, according to different stands and in different aspects.
Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.
TASK 3C (P3.3) In this criteria, I will explain how business environment such as political, social, technical, legal and environmental and cultural environment shape the behavior of Target Corporation. First what is cultural environment? It is an arrangement of convictions, practices, traditions and practices that are observed to be common to everybody that is living inside a specific population.
Women and the battle to maintain a work-lifestyle balance has been consistently debated and toyed with by society for ages. Anne-Marie Slaughter, Professor of Politics and author of “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All” explains the continuous hardship of balancing a career and a family; as well, Stephen Marche, writer and author of “Home Economics: The Link Between Work-Life and Income Equality” combats Slaughter’s article and the many gaps present in society. Slaughter and Marche compare and contrast the differences of the leadership gap between men and women, the strategies of maintaining a work-balance lifestyle in regards to family, and the type of dialogue representing men in articles written by women. Anne-Marie Slaughter and Stephen
To comfort her friend into obediently listening to Montag’s book of poetry, Mrs. Phelps remarks that “‘if we listen nice, Mr. Montag will be happy and then maybe we can go on and do something else’” (95). Even though Mrs. Phelps isn’t agreeing to follow the majority in this circumstance, she still is promoting submission through conformity to a person in a position of power. She attempts to make listening to literature, a highly illegal crime in their society, seem like no big deal by using positive language like “nice” and “happy.” Those words put a positive spin on submission of self, all in hopes that “Mr. Montag will be happy.”
Bell take the bold stand to unveil her truth and the downfall that woman typical fall into that keep the dominate pattern of men in the workplace. For example, some woman relay on the man to become the finical provider as they became the homemaker. Although this is not the reality as more woman take their place in the workforce, it is the social concept that woman are homemaker.
Power can have the persuasive action in undoing the moral ethics of one’s character. This can be seen throughout history, such as World War II and proven by the actions of Napoleon in the allegory, Animal Farm, by George Orwell. As Lord Acton said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In history what was viewed as a villain, is never the same as the perception. A leader does not begin wanting to do wrong, they start with the best intentions, but power is a tricky thing.
The cliche phrase “with great power comes great responsibility” is one that can be applied to many different situations, but what really is power? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as the “possession of control, authority, or influence over others.” The concept of power is one that is familiar around the world, whether in a positive or negative connotation. In To Kill a Mockingbird, power is seen in someway with every turn of a page. To Kill a Mockingbird is set in the mid 1930s during the Great Depression in a town called Maycomb in Alabama.
The book, “A Society of Young Women” by Amelil Le Renard explores the daily lives of young urban woman in their workplace, university campus, and the mall. The book is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is called, “Riyadh, A City of Closed Spaces”, Renard begins the chapter with stating, “Arriving in Riyadh, I was struck by its silence. Even the constant hum of air conditioners and traffic was aborbosed by it. The city seemed both noiseless and odorless (27).”
After all, if evil was entirely up to personality, how do situations like Abu Ghraib and the Stanford Prison Experiment occur? It is very unlikely that the randomly selected students that drew the role of prison guard all had some secret desire to dominate their classmates. It is even less likely that all of the prisoner classmates were weak-minded and submissive. What if Zimbardo is right in that we all have the potential to dominate or submit ourselves to being dominated if the situation and social forces demand it? Would a person who is prone to committing charitable acts and helping others really be able to transform into a ruthless prison guard just because they aren't being held accountable for their actions?