1. Give an outline of the views on English spelling presented in texts 1 and 2.
The two different texts mention, and are all based on the way our spelling has developed with our technology. According to Anne Trubecks “Proper Spelling? Its Tyme to Let Luce!” the way our language has developed only makes sense compared to how the humans are relying more on technology than ever. There is no guidelines on how to spell words, and because of the fact that words had to spelled in a specific way, is only a thing that happened recently. This however contradicts Lee Simmons “Spelling: A Rebuttal From Wired’s Copydesk” . Said article speaks of how that yes it is a more common occurrence now that spelling isn’t completely correct, and that how it constantly
…show more content…
Therefore the writing has correct grammar and spelling. Although he is arguing against it, he does make some jokes regarding the issue, for example; “…. spell colonnade and odyssey and pirhana(…er, piranha).” (p.4, l.10) which makes the generally negative tone in the text lighter. The meaning of the words, and how they’re spelled in latin - our base language - are also brought into the text. “Why is there a g in sign but not wine? Because the latin root is signum, as in signature.” (p.5,l.98-100). He speaks of trubeck as if she were a friend, which is very likely because they work at the same workplace. He also writes in a very neutral tone, which would mean that even though he is very proper in his grammar, he casually uses words like bitch (p.5,l.130) in a sentence. Along with this, the way he writes it, a very stable way of writing, he appeals to the logical side of the brain. Overall his tone of writing in negative, and appeals to the logical side in out …show more content…
Her perspective on the topic of English writing, is that because of the English language being so difficult to learn, we should lower our standards, so that the younger people in the generation can learn other things faster, and not have to worry about spelling. While this completely contradicts text 2, in which its stated that everyone needs a baseline to learn from, and to evolve, which is what we need to educate ourselves further. It also explains why we should worry about writing, because communication with others would be a lot more difficult, if for example, each person spoke a different dialect. This would make the issue of communicating via. The internet, and chatting systems almost impossible. Even though from the perspective of the first text, this wouldn’t be a problem, because viral communication is so popular and commonly done, that almost everyone knows how to speak “leetspeak” and communicate with eachother via. this wireless world. Although most of the younger generation can write, or at least somewhat understand “leetspeak” that doesn’t mean that doesn’t mean they always have. I personally agree with text 2, because if we didn’t have something to build our knowledge og languages on, then we wouldn’t be able to develop the English language - or any language for that matter -
In the essay, he tells us about how when he was young, he had to teach himself how to read and write. This was not easy for him being he is a slave. He used his advantages and found ways to seek help from his mistress and from the
It allows his audience to better understand his message and to see how he thinks literature is made. They can more easily understand his purpose and agree with
“The argument which he so warmly urged, against my learning to read, only served to inspire me with a desire and determination to learn.” He never gave up even if someone tried to make him stray from his desire and talent he had the determination to find his joy. This is how much he valued education that he didn't let nobody tell him he can't learn He doesn't value education because it was a eye opener it showed him what was really going on around him and how unjust he is being treated ”I heard nothing without hearing it, and felt nothing without feeling it, and felt nothing without feeling it.” But even though you may think that he didn't value education because it showed him how unjust he was being treated He truly did because learning to read and write made him capable of teaching others how to also read and write This is why he valued education the way he
He utilizes understandable language to help him precisely get across the point he is trying to make. An instance of this word use can be seen in his recollection of his family being split apart. Page 19 shares that "My father was crying... It was the first time I saw him cry. I had never thought it possible.
Had this not been required reading , I would not have read past the first few lines. Ms. Wheeler’s writing was more technical in nature. She uses US Standard English, to explain her work with student’s explaining how she decodes her students work looking for differences are in their first vernacular from the US Standard English, and discusses
It showed that students do not believe textspeak is appropriate in formal writing assignments. They recognize the difference between texting friends and writing formally and know what is appropriate in each situation. This was proven true in the student samples, in which no examples of textspeak were used" (Cullington 367). In order words, Cullington's research showed that there is little effect on writing ability from texting. She collected sample essays and found no evidence of textspeak.
One hundred and eighty days per year. Five days per week. Fifty minutes per day. This is the amount of time an English teacher has to educate their students in one school year alone. In this short period, English teachers should be allowed to teach the curriculum they see fit for their students.
Also, I found this particular piece to be difficult to read and interpret. The varying spelling and sentence structure made the letter difficult to follow, and I found myself rereading sections to verify that I understood what she was writing
All of these factors combine and work well together to form a well-executed argument within Cullington’s essay. Cullington begins her essay by addressing her opposition: “It’s taking over our lives” (pg. 361). She cites studies done that suggest that a decline in the quality of students’ formal writing has occurred since the advent of text messaging, and she also cites teachers who believe that their own students’ works are influenced for the worse by the students’ being accustomed to texting and using textspeak. Cullington then proposes her opposing position that the writing of students is unaffected by their use of texting and text speak. She also cites studies that support her thesis that text messaging and textspeak do not have an effect on
Not So Fast”, conducts her own study with a few colleagues to take notes on how students writing skills are changing. She decides to conduct another one twenty five years later to see how much the writing skills have changed since technology has been updated and became more available to students. She found that “students today are writing more than ever before.” Although we still have the same amount of writing errors as before, the patterns of errors are different. Many people argue that technology is only making our writing skill worse, this study helps to prove a different theory.
He supports this argument by citing a study conducted by students who have attended The University College London. The study proved to us that we no longer thoroughly read material, rather we just skim over most of what we read. From the convoluted works of the late 19th century, to the material of present day, the way we write and comprehend
He uses words from ¨Pyramus and Thisbe¨ such as blood, rage and death. The text states "Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean," which includes words from "Pyramus and Thisbe" and refers to an incident in the story. Just like Romeo and Juliet, Pyramus and Thisbe were killed, demonstrating that these two stories share multiple similarities. The text states "Where
In the article of “A Homemade Education” he states “But now, trying to write simple English, I not only wasn’t articulate, I wasn’t even functional. How would I sound writing in slang. ”and the reason why I say
The narrator disagrees with a number of groups on the way which they try to study the Library of Babel, mostly for their aggressive action and impatience. The blasphemous sect grew impatient has no regard for the sequences of the natural law of the books in the Library of Babel. He calls those who take to chance with no respect to the content of any book people who cause “divine disorder” (84). The Purifiers also were an impatient group that skimmed for books and not regarding their well-being, destroying all the bookshelves what they thought as irrelevant. Though the books may be lost the narrator brings up the following points that there are too many books that any reduction done by humans is very minor; each book will have a copy with just one minor difference, so there are technically multiple versions (85).