Imagine seeing character from a film walking in a obscure solitary hallway where you see a vast shadow of a mole trying to devour you... this might seem cool but this is indeed one of the major differences between the City of Ember film and the Bible. If you want to have my opinion, I would assay that the Bible is a lot better than the film, some other differences are such as adding incident, speed of story and events, and characters. In the City of Ember film they had to add some events so that the motion picture wouldn't get boring.One of the events that the picture had and the Bible doesn't would be the gigantic mole because the mole had some major events such as consumption the mayor and trying to butcher Lina and Doon. Another major issue added to the movie would be when Lina and Doon were escaping ember for in the Bible it says that that Lina and Doon find a stone marked with E and then journey down some ladders into a room full of boats, and then in the film it says that the boats are the lockers that the folks that work in the pipework , and also in the book there is barely a stream with a really solid tide that takes the boats away, And then in the film there are two enormous wheels and you need to go to a concealed control room and turn off one of the enormous wheels so that the boats go.And also the minute at the conclusion of the book/film is assume to go to Ms. Murdo not Doon’s father. …show more content…
As an instance Lina wasn't suppose to find the instructions on the day of the assignment day and Lina’s granny wasn't suppose to perish the night of assignment day.Also in the film Poppy was believe to find the book that told about the Lady who was one of the first people that lived in ember. In addition The people that made the motion picture didn't mention the part where Doon watch the moth flying out of its
The “Nightjohn” book and movie had many differences. The plot and story were kind of the same. The things that were different were mostly the details in the book and movie. Here is my comparison of the “Nightjohn” book and movie. First off, here are some differences.
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
“The Shining” is a novel written by Stephen King in 1977 and a horror movie directed by Stanley Kubrick in 1980. The novel and movie tells a story about Jack Torrance, who becomes the off-season winter caretaker of the Overlook Hotel. Although the movie and the book have some similarities; there are many differences from the adaptation of the novel. In the book, the main characters are Jack Torrance, Wendy Torrance, and their son Danny Torrance.
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
It is crazy to think how pop culture can point to the things it works so hard to reject, but in the case of Divergent by Veronica Roth, parallels between it and the gospel abound. Divergent is set in a dystopian Chicago in which the citizens are divided into 5 factions; the brave, the selfless, the intelligent, the honest and the kind. The story follows Tris Prior, a sixteen year old girl who realizes her Divergence, or possession of characteristics of more than one faction. The novel and film adaption of Divergent include many similarities to the gospel, notably the emphasis on a choice of commitment, the concept that we need more than one characteristic to grow, that salvation is brought about through sacrifice, and that humankind is at its heart, evil.
In both 1984 and The Catcher in the Rye, the authors use tone, diction, and simile to create a setting in which the government has complete control in 1984 and shabby in The Catcher in the Rye. To begin, 1984 is a novel about a dystopian society centered around a middle aged man named Winston. The story follows him as he goes through his dreary life until he meets Julia, who sparks the rebellion in him, leading to a series of events that eventually get him caught by the government. First, Orwell uses tone, diction, and simile to establish a controlling setting. Tone is clearly seen when Winston is reading off a list of tasks the government has given to him.
Stephen King, a famous writer once said, “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They are both fruit, but they taste completely different.” Truly, this applies to all movies and books. This quote is effective describing the novel and the movie, A Raisin in the Sun. Although the two share similar scenes and acts, the movie shows a lot more details which make it better.
Overall The book and movie have some differences but they mainly focus on dystopian fiction. The film and the book the City of Ember used dystopian fiction efficiently because of the great use of environmental deterioration. According to Master class one dystopian motif is societies in cataclysmic decline, with characters who battle environmental
The Pit of Despair is not as scary as the Zoo of Death and they easily find Westley which does not build tension at all. Thus, the book builds much more tension compared to the movie which makes the story a page
There are many simularities and differences in the book and movie " The
However, when I watched the movie, I felt as though everything I had imagined in my head from reading the book was wrong. Although, this might be the case since I read the book first, and then compared it to the
Battle to the Death: Cinema Vs. Novel Some of the best movies are based on books. One movie based on a book is The Hunger Games. While the movie is entertaining, it is very different from the book.
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
“The City of Ember” has many similarities and differences between film however, the movie was a more entertaining experience. The two brave and strong main characters, Lina and Doon, are assigned each other’s wished jobs on assignment day. After the assembly, Lina and Doon secretly switch their jobs as the next day they go off to each other’s new jobs, Lina as a messenger and Doon as a pipeworks worker. Together, they explore Ember and eventually find a way out in the pipeworks where Doon works. They take Poppy, Lina’s younger sister, and get into a boat made from one of the lockers.
The movie only focuses on the story of the Andrea Gail and the men from Gloucester. I think the overall story is better off this way. For example, I think if the book was written like this, the reader would become more connected to the characters and the book. The reader would go through the same emotions and feelings as the characters because they experienced the same event simultaneously. All in all, I think the book has a great story, but lacks a proper structure for the story at hand.