Coretta Scott King Should Be Banned

The board then removed the books claiming they were “anti-American” and that it was the board’s duty to protect their children from moral danger as well as physical and mental ones (FindLaw). Of course, this angered some students so much that some of them -- most notably Steven Pico -- decided to take it to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. At the district court, the defendants argued that since “the books offended their [the board’s/PONYU] social, political, and moral tastes and not

So I do like the book because of the morality development fact, the overflow of racial comments and actions outweigh the educational value of the morality development. I do not think this book should be taught in today 's school system and i think we need to move on to better

Fahrenheit 451 should be allowed in all high school curriculums because the certain situations of this book that may be found inappropriate, add context and depth to the book that allows the reader to understand more about it. Though readers should get a disclaimer before reading it because of certain crude situations. Although these some situations found in this book may be crude or inappropriate they add great context, and depth to the book. This book really opens readers eyes about what the future could be like and how it might affect themselves.

People in the south were the first to start pulling the book off shelves in libraries and schools. His book was thought to be too frightening, a story of rebellion, fear, punishment and escape were too much for young children. Some banned it for grounds of religious principles because of it’s “witchcraft and supernatural elements”. A prominent child psychologist

For the reason that the n-word appears 219 times in the novel, many schools have decided to ban the book in their classrooms. Cautiously questioning students whether or not the novel arouses an “uncomfortable” (Coeyman) feeling, teachers debate on teaching The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Multiple teachers feel that their inter-racial classes may include students who feel offended by the n-word. Various schools have considered the novel to be “...too racially offensive…”(Coeyman). For instance, school districts in Virginia have banned the book after a mother complained about how her son was disturbed by the “‘...racial slurs in there and offensive wording that you can’t get past…’”(Balingit).

the content of the non-fiction novel, which detail the brutal murder of a prosperous Kansas farmer and his family are apparently too macabre for some…” (latimes.com). In Savannah, Georgia parents also were the cause for the book to be banned in an English Advanced Placement class, “... a parent complained that it contained sex, violence, and profanity” (weebly.com). This book was mainly challenged by parents because they believed their children were not yet mature enough to handle the book’s

From complaints such as; this book is racist, and it is discrimination against “Black” people, the novel was removed from the Concord, Massachusetts, Public Library. (Apstein) In another case, the novel was marked as number five on the American Library Association’s “100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-1999.” (“Fight”) It isn’t shocking that the novel ended up on the list with all the misunderstandings that happened.

In Judson, Texas this book was banned from the district’s AP English curriculum after a parent complained to the superintendent that this book was “sexually explicit and offensive towards Christians”. Judson is a small rural city in Texas with a strong Christian community but even with a Christian base many students, teachers and even other parents disagreed with the ban. Students argued that if The Handmaid’s Tale is banned then many of the books in their curriculum should

‘Not yet’” (Klause 167). Proponents of banning Blood and Chocolate may be unable to substantiate their argument regarding the sexual explicitness of the novel when the very act of sex is resisted by the protagonist, and not because the two adolescents would be caught by an adult figure or some other purpose based on consequences alone. One could argue that

Honestly what would banning this book do, except keep us from learning about it in school? Very few teachers ever teach this book and if a parent doesn't want their child to read it they can just have a word with the teacher. The only thing it would if the book were banned is keep us from having to read and write about this book in class. You can still go to a public library or a bookstore and read it.

Banned books in the classroom Banned books there are plenty of them in the United States of America, and some schools can‘t read books we have read here at our school. How would you feel if maybe one of your favorite books was banned and say you couldn’t share it with your friends to enjoy and learn from, or books that are used in the classroom one year and not the next. When it comes to banned books and such we need to look at what banned books are with also what challenged books are and what their difference is. What are some of the cases that have come about with banned books and challenged books in schools, and why they were banned and challenged, what can we do to be the help of banned books in the classroom, and also what we can do about

(cbldf.org). Because of this challenge to the book, the principal decided that all questionable content regarding student curriculum will be disclosed to parents beforehand. In 2003, the book was challenged and then completely banned in George County, Mississippi. The copious amounts of profanity and sexual content lead to this unfortunate conclusion.

Controversy over the choice of books used to teach within schools has many parents questioning whether a book is appropriate for a school setting. Truman Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood, is a perfect example of a novel that tests the limits with the content placed in the book. Within Capote’s novel, he discusses many topics that parents find inappropriate for teachers to teach to their children. The Windsor Forest High School, in Savannah, Georgia, banned this book, “when a parent complained about sex, violence, and profanity …”

The book was challenged by a middle school in Brentwood, Tennessee in 2006 because the book contains “profanity” and “contains adult themes such as rape and incest.” The complaints also say that the book promotes “racial hatred, racial division, racial separation, and promotes white supremacy.” The people that say that are people that are trying to ‘protect’ other people from knowing and understanding what happened in the past because they believe that if they do know and understand what happened in the past then they will become racist and believe in white supremacy. These kinds of people are like the Holocaust deniers who believe that six million Jews where not murdered despite all of the evidence against that. George Santayana once said “Those who cannot remember the past are bound to repeat it.”

In conclusion, “The Catcher in the Rye” shouldn't be banned from the school curriculum because it teaches us a life lesson. Even though this book has featured several controversial issues like profanity, It has very essential moral lessons that readers can benefit from. Therefore, there is not any adequate reason for banning this