Cursive Writing Synthesis

In my opinion, I believe schools should continue to teach cursive. Cursive is and will be a lifelong skill, it can help lots of people, and help train our minds. First of all, cursive will be needed as a lifelong skill. Although technology is taking over the world and we no longer need our signature to identify us, it will still be needed. According to “ Baltimore Sun”, Joel Sher, a lawyer said that when he sorts paper, he no longer needs to sign his name because it is

Michaela Cullington, author of “Does Texting Affect Writing,” declares texting does not affect students writing. Cullington uses facts to support her overall claim, and gets many teachers’ opinions on the subject. The author did not use valuable sources, which questioned her overall purpose. Cullington used a lot of her own opinion throughout the text, but lacked supporting facts. The story has many flaws, making Cullington argument on how texting is not affecting students writing, not reliable.

In school students do not care about writing as much as they used to. If they would work harder in school, their grades would be higher and more colleges would want them. In Esther Cepeda 's research, she managed to prove that students test scores are going down. That is because they do not work as hard as they used to.

In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.

It showed that students do not believe textspeak is appropriate in formal writing assignments. They recognize the difference between texting friends and writing formally and know what is appropriate in each situation. This was proven true in the student samples, in which no examples of textspeak were used" (Cullington 367). In order words, Cullington's research showed that there is little effect on writing ability from texting. She collected sample essays and found no evidence of textspeak.

Common Core is the new standard of teaching in schools implemented by the federal government. State education chiefs and governors developed a set of standards that they believe students should know after each grade, so they are prepared for college or a job after high school. But are these standards fair for everyone? Not everyone learns at the same speed and some students require special attention.

Michaela Cullington was a former student at University in Pennsylvania when she wrote the essay of “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Have you ever thought if texting truly effects our writing style when it comes to college levels? Cullington did research of her own from different people group asking this question. Her thesis sentence was “IT TAKES OVER OUR LIVES” (…). The way that she capitalized all the letters is something that can engage the reader and the curiosity of knowing what is taking our lives?

All of these factors combine and work well together to form a well-executed argument within Cullington’s essay. Cullington begins her essay by addressing her opposition: “It’s taking over our lives” (pg. 361). She cites studies done that suggest that a decline in the quality of students’ formal writing has occurred since the advent of text messaging, and she also cites teachers who believe that their own students’ works are influenced for the worse by the students’ being accustomed to texting and using textspeak. Cullington then proposes her opposing position that the writing of students is unaffected by their use of texting and text speak. She also cites studies that support her thesis that text messaging and textspeak do not have an effect on

An essay titled "does Texting Affect Writing?" was published by Michaela Cullington while she studied to gain her masters degree in speech and language pathology at Marywood University. In her essay she claims that texting and texting language neither benefits or harms a students academic writing. Michaela Cullington asserts that a conspiracy has been going around concerning how texting can limit a students writing ability in ways such as not being able to convey emotion in writing, forgetting how to write a formal English paper and use correct punctuation, and most of all a decline in spelling.

Not So Fast”, conducts her own study with a few colleagues to take notes on how students writing skills are changing. She decides to conduct another one twenty five years later to see how much the writing skills have changed since technology has been updated and became more available to students. She found that “students today are writing more than ever before.” Although we still have the same amount of writing errors as before, the patterns of errors are different. Many people argue that technology is only making our writing skill worse, this study helps to prove a different theory.

Most people today use writing on a daily basis. The development of writing dates back all the way to around 3000 B.C. Two forms that developed surrounding that time were cuneiform and hieroglyphics. These both were some of the first forms of writing discovered by Sumerians and Egyptians. They have matured over time to become what we use to this very day. We may not use the symbols and pictures they used but they are what got everything started.

Studies show that people who write in cursive have more active brains, than those who do not. In the future kids will need cursive to sign important documents. There is a good way to save class time and only teach what is necessary in cursive and schools should try this out. The plan is whenever they have to write their name at the top of a paper is to make them write it in cursive. Then when the teacher needs to write a response she should write it in cursive, that way the kids have to learn to read cursive.

Cursive writing is still essential, it has very important value. We can't let technology take over education. In my opinion we are becomig slaves of the new technology, that can't be good in any way , technology is making us become lazy. If computers do everything for us than we will be totally useless without them, we are losing work ethic.

Thankfully I did not need to run away because just two short years later cursive was already obsolete, little did I know what a travesty this was. Children all around the nation are not being taught cursive, and this is an injustice to them. As children learning cursive will help them create fine motor skills. Not only will it help every child but according to Maria Konnikova a writer for the Times magazine describes that “cursive can serve as a teaching aid for children with learning impairments like dyslexia” (Steinmetz 6). Clearly every child can get something out of learning cursive, whether it is fine motor skills or a more precious teaching aid for a struggling child.

During this semester I’ve learned a great deal about reading historic documents. I’ve learned how to deciphering records, extracting, abstracting, transcribing documents, and how to read Italic, Secretary Hand, Copperplate-Round Hand, Spencerian and Palmer cursive scripts. Gaining this knowledge has empowered me to continue pursing my love of family history work. The following is new information I have learned. Reading earlier eras of documents can be a challenge.