1. Introduction
There are many different methods social scientist can apply in order compare cases within the field of political science. Among the most popular are comparative case studies, Qualitative Comparative Analysis and statistical methods Statistical methods. They all have in common they they attempt to test the empirical implications of a theory (George & Bennett, 2005: 6). However there are also differences between the methods, mainly in their epistemological and methodological assumptions. According to Vis the biggest epistemological differences lay in the way causality is being perceived (Vis, 2012:171). Where as the biggest methodological differences are the ratio of how the different cases are selected as well as the operationalisation
…show more content…
This is due to the fact that the cases are analysed as a sequence where A leads to B (Sekhon, 2004: 288). On the other hand is a disadvantage of comparative case studies that the entire focus is on a single cause only, which doesn't provide answers if there are possibly more explaining variables (Mahoney, 2007: 135). Furthermore is it less transparent and formalized than the other two methods I will discuss; qualitative comparative and statistical analysis. Comparative case studies are harder to replicate due to their very nature of being unique cases (Blatter & Haverland, 2012: 67; Benoît Rihoux & Ragin, 2009: 14). Which is also the cause for the last disadvantages; uniqueness of the cases leads to a lower degree of generalization of any conclusions drawn in comparison to statistical analysis (Blatter & Haverland, 2012: …show more content…
It is commonly agreed upon to apply all methods complementary in order to gain the benefits and advantages of all methods while avoiding the disadvantages (George & Bennett, 2005: 34). There is no golden rule of how to apply the different methods and it would depend on each research. But possible scenarios could be to use a statistical analysis in order to identify relationships between variables. Followed by a case study that can provide other why those variables relate (George & Bennett, 2005: 34; Sekhon, 2004: 281). It is entirely possible to conduct an analysis the other way around. By discovering formerly unknown relationships between variables via a case study. To subsequently testing with the help of a statistical analysis whether those results are valid for the population (George & Bennett, 2005: 34). Furthermore can the application statistical analysis and QCA provide a deeper understanding of the researched issue. Vis (2012: 169; 192) argues that the combination of QCA and other methods can be profitable of the researcher. Blatter & Haverland (2012: 231) suggest that QCA when being combined with another method is a great for a cross-case analysis and for example a case study could be used for the case analysis. It however should be noted that among all described methods only the QCA can account for causal
Gopnik continues her article about children using their past to shape their future. She introduces the topic of causal understanding. Causal understanding includes the understanding the relationship between cause and effect. When people understand the relationship between cause and effect, it can allow them the change the process of habituation. Learning what goes wrong in life, can help assist breaking bad habits.
Abstract In the United States, there have been several events that have shaped the way that our economy is currently functioning. Events such as the Great Depression in 1929 and the more recent Great Recession of 2008 have led to financial stress on large, important industries. In these difficult economic times, executive officers and policy makers must make difficult decisions about how to combat this financial stress. In particular, the banking industry in the 20’s and 30’s and the automotive industry in 2008 were struggling to stay afloat.
Do you agree with: the Decision/Held in the case, the Sentence? I think that the Defendant Ms Flett is guilty and I agree with the decision of the judge in this case. The sentence for Ms Flett is that she received life imprisonment for each count of manslaughter that is being served concurrently, along with six months for the charge of arson, which is also being served concurrently, and weapons prohibition for life. Ms Flett will be eligible for parole after seven years, if she is granted parole she will be under community supervision for the rest of her life.
Psychological scientists utilize a variety of methods, which include descriptive, correlational, and experimental methods. Descriptive method uses case studies, naturalistic observations, and surveys. A case study usually focuses on an individual or a small group of individuals. A naturalistic observation usually focuses on a larger group of individuals in a natural environment. A survey is used to ask a larger group of individuals’ questions about attitudes and behavior.
To start, there's an effective use of statistics throughout the essay which gives us a better understanding of the argument being presented. “A 2006 study by the Government
Measuring evidence in numerical terms, according to the author of Policy Paradox, is an extremely effective way of persuading the public to see problems with policy proposals. Although quantitative measurements are easily manipulated and polls like the one Armentano uses as evidence can be perceived in different perspectives, Stone notes the effectiveness of numbers in defining policy
Do interest groups help or hurt America’s democratic process? Provide a rigorous debate on both sides of the issue before taking a stand in your conclusion. The United States of America is a special continent because of its history of how it became to be known as United States. A part of what makes it extra special is that it is a democracy type government.
A few assets are rare and rivalrous, yet numerous are against rivalrous and bottomless. I believe that the polis demonstrate all the more nearly speaks to the way we make and comprehend public policy. I additionally think that it is essential to remember these two models of society as we proceed with ideas of the author Stone. She utilizes a ton of illustrations from social policy most remarkably, welfare and governmental policy regarding minorities in society in view of her experience and hobbies as a researcher, additionally in light of the fact that we can see the contrasts between these two models obviously in the social policy stadium. That does not imply that we can't matter Stone to other substantive policy territories, and we will do only that as the course advances.
In the Enquiry, the question is how we arrive at the idea of cause (8). To some measure the epistemological and ontological issues are inseparable, and also the precise nature of their connection is a dilemma of significant philosophical relevance. Nonetheless, although a likeness of view in both works exists, the way in which these views are argued are somewhat
As quantitative data would not be robust enough to explain complex issues. for e.g. Quantitative data would not allow children to explain their choices. However, qualitative data has some disadvantages in this research. For example, because of the central role played by Corsaro in the generation of data, it is not possible to replicate qualitative studies. Also, contexts, situations, events, conditions, and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent.
An advantage of conducting a Survey is that it allows the researcher to collect a large amount of data over a short period of time. They can also be created and administered quickly and easily. A disadvantage of a Survey is that often times the answer choice on a survey may not reflect the participants true opinion. Case Study is a research method in which is single person is directly observed. This study is an open ended type of data collection.
Both types of approaches suggest a system of organisation in which various disciplines are brought together in the solution of a
For each of those comparative methods there are strengths, weaknesses and solutions for those weaknesses. The first method of comparison I will discuss is the method of comparing many countries. This method is also called ‘large-n’ comparison, where n stands for the number of countries. It’s very suitable with qualitative analysis of aggregate data. The presence of statistical control makes this method most like an experimental design, which has control groups and treatment groups (Landman & Carvalho, 2016).
Qualitative research method has been widely used to gather data on specific subjects. With in- depth analysis, this method helps the researcher to get greater insights on various phenomena. The major reason why it is usually preferred over other methods is that it not only examines the when, where and what of a decision making process but also the why and how. Debates, interviews and various other researches are the areas where this approach is commonly used. Depending on the requirement of the research, the data gets streamlined once the entire data is obtained and gathered.