The British act finally pushed the colonists from protests was the Tea Act of 1773 proposed by Lord North was placed. It began when the East India company almost was in bankruptcy since their tea was barely bought; much of Britain's money was used for the French and Indian War and was not able to help the company get out of their crisis. The Tea Act of 1773 lowered the prices of tea and also added tax to it to the point it created monopoly and it caused colonial merchants to lose money since they were no longer able to sell tea within the colonies anymore. It also allowed the East India Company to be the only one to ship to the colonies which meant that the company was the only way for colonists to get tea from.
In response to the Tea Act
Raven, you are right. The British felt as if the colonies should accept the consequences for the colonists ' actions at the Boston Tea Party. As a form of punishment, the British passed the Intolerable Acts. The Intolerable Acts included the following: the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston 's port until the East India Company was repaid; the Massachusetts Government Act, which empowered the king to elect government officials in Massachusetts; the Administration of Justice Act, which allowed the government to move a colonist 's trial to another colony if a fair trial was unavailable in Massachusetts; and the Quartering Act, which permitted British troops to occupy vacant buildings when in the
The purpose of the act is to allow the drawback of duties on the export of tea exported to British colonies in America. The act granted a license to the East India Company to export duty-free tea. Details of the sale of tea to the highest bidder in a public sale are provided, including the requirement that a deposit be made to the East India Company. Penalties and fees to be applied to a forfeited deposit are described. The authority of the commissioner of the British royal treasury is established for granting licenses for the sale and export of tea.
This surprised the British government. The colonists even threatened tax collects forcing them to quit their jobs or to even leave the colonies. Protests spread into the streets and groups like the Sons of Liberty encouraged the colonists to boycott British products. These boycotts soon hurt British businesses in the colonies. The British government was forced to repeal the Stamp Act.
The Tea Act was Lord North 's attempt to rescue the British East India Company. By 1773, the tea company was in danger of going broke unless it could sell off the 17 million pounds of tea that were sitting in its London warehouses. The Tea Act lowered the cost of tea that was sold by the British East India Company in the colonies. As a result, even taxed British tea became cheaper than smuggled Dutch tea. The Tea Act also gave the British East India Company
The Tea Act of 1773 reinstated the issue of Britain’s right to tax the colonies. The Parliament and the colonies disagreed on a system of government in which the colonies would share the same rights and control as Parliament over their colonial affairs. Between 1773 and 1776, enormous amounts of tension between the center and the peripheries regarding the right to control the colonies led to the disintegration of the empire. The colonies and Parliament continued their dispute about the supremacy of the colonies that began with the Stamp Act of 1765.
Separately, these acts did not cause the American revolution but together the acts created tension between the American colonists and England. The Stamp act started to build the tension between the colonists and England because it was the first tax directly imposed onto the colonists. They saw this as unfair because during the French and Indian war the colonist were ignored and then suddenly they were expected to pay off Britain’s war debt. The Stamp Act led to the Declaratory Act which led to many other laws given by King George the III and Parliament because of the backlash received from the colonists. The Boston tea party was an effect of the Tea Act enacted on the American colonists.
This was forcing the colonists to house British soldiers. The colonists also disliked that they were all being punished for one state's mistake and saw this as unfair. In 1770 the townshend act was repealed all except tea. The colonists response to this furthering their rebellion was the Boston Tea party. The Duchess tea at the time was more expensive than Britain's tea and this still lead to the boycott of British tea because of the principle of not paying the tax for the soldiers
As you already know, we patriots cannot withstand and bite our tongues to your laws and policies any further. We cannot be held down by your unnecessary restrictions and countless acts like the Stamp Act, Sugar Act and Tea Act. We fought and helped you during the French and Indian war and endured nothing out of it other than uproars of violence and furor from your troops towards our people. Therefore we want our own government, policies, economy and laws. It’s our time to stand for ourselves and be our own country!
The Double Standard For Freedom The colonists accepted British authority for many decades, however in the mid to late 1700’s the colonists had a blossoming divergent identity and felt the British were infringing on it. This began with the Molasses Act and continued to build through the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and then finally the Intolerable Acts. For many decades, the colonists were effectively autonomous, remaining under the British rule but behaving mostly independently. However, after the Seven Years War, Britain began to overreach by imposing revenue taxes on things like tea.
Meanwhile, these acts removed jurisdiction in the vice-admiralty courts and forcing colonies pay additional taxes against colonists will. No doubt the Parliament ignored colonists’ citizen right and show no respect and mercy to the colonists were part of British citizen, to maximum their power to limit or control colonies’ economic activities only service British government’s interests. Therefore, colonists boycotted the new duty on tea and protested British’s East India Tea Company a monopoly on the colonies’ tea trade the later on Boston Tea Party, showed colonies no need to royal to a government that show no respect to its people and seeing colonists as tool to solve its financial problem, satisfy their greatest selfish to benefit the Crown and British merchants. Forth, revolution was necessarily to protect their collective freedom from property and rights no continue harmed by imposing more additional acts and taxation to the colonists without their
After the boycotts and protests the tea had all rotted and could not be used, I know what they did was wrong and thought they could have handled it differently, but they did prove our point. Parliament was not happy and thought that Boston should repay for the lost tea, and put forth four punishments, we like to call them the Intolerable Acts. Since Massachusetts seemed to be the only one being punished a lot of the other colonies realized how corrupt parliament really was. We couldn’t even have town meetings without the approval of the governor and we were under the control of parliament. This alone pushed many of us away from the crown and towards becoming American Patriots.
However, in 1773, the East India Company noticed that there was an overproduction of tea and its prices surely would decline (“The Third Imperial Crisis”). Tea was one of the, if not the, most valuable asset to many members in Parliament. Britain was forced to impose a new Tea tax on the colonists, which was aimed to keep the price of tea high. Even this act was reasonable in the eyes of the British, but to the colonists, this was just a British way of assuring dominance considering it was now for profit rather than to pay off debts. The response to the Tea Acts was the Boston Tea Party of 1773 (“The Third Imperial Crisis”).
The Boston Tea Party was a violent, courageous, and an eventful act that took place in 1997 because of constant disputes. It started to become a large issue when the British and English colonist constantly disagreed about the unfair taxes that were charged from the British. The colonists didn’t agree to the taxes at all the the government officials formed a plan. The British put such a hefty tax on the tea because they realized the demand was so outrageously high, and they could make a much larger profit off of it. Colonists did not want to pay the huge taxes, so they started buying/smuggling tea from East India, but the British wanted to have the colonists to buy tea from them because of the taxes.
The French-Indian War of 1754-1763 resulted in political, ideological, and economic alterations within Britain and its American colonies. The French and Indian War, also referred to as The Seven Years War, began with British and French conflicts across the Ohio River Valley, as both nations wanted to claim the land for themselves. The first blood of the French-Indian War began with multiple British failures, including Washington’s dreadful defeat at Fort Necessity and General Braddock’s failed attempt at conquering Fort Duquesne, in which he died along with two-thirds of his army (Document C). The British would, however, gain momentum in 1759 with multiple victories, including their most significant triumph, Quebec.
and they too were attacked so they had to fire into the mob. Parliament passed the Tea Act, which gave the British East Indians company a complete monopoly of the American tea business meaning the colonists could only buy tea from this company. The colonists opposed this law even though it lowered the price of tea. They viewed the tea Act as merely another example