Review Of The Tea Act Of 1773 By Ehrenreich

632 Words3 Pages

While the colonists vandalized and destroyed property from the Boston Tea Party of 1773, the patriots’ behavior were justified and was not a be considered an intemperate act of lawlessness because the British were treating colonist unjustly, the colonists did not have any representation in Parliament, and the British sent soldiers to live with colonists against their will and the taxes impose on to them. In this book of nonfiction based on the journalist's experiential research, Ehrenreich attempts to ascertain whether it is currently possible for an individual to live on a minimum-wage in America. Taking jobs as a waitress, a maid in a cleaning service, and a Walmart sales employee, the author summarizes and reflects on her work, her relationships with fellow workers, and her financial struggles in each situation. An experienced journalist, Ehrenreich is aware of the limitations of her experiment and the ethical implications of her experiential research tactics and reflects on these issues in the text. The author is forthcoming about her methods and supplements her experiences with scholarly research on her places of employment, the economy, and the rising cost of living in America. Ehrenreich’s project is timely, …show more content…

The purpose of the act is to allow the drawback of duties on the export of tea exported to British colonies in America. The act granted a license to the East India Company to export duty-free tea. Details of the sale of tea to the highest bidder in a public sale are provided, including the requirement that a deposit be made to the East India Company. Penalties and fees to be applied to a forfeited deposit are described. The authority of the commissioner of the British royal treasury is established for granting licenses for the sale and export of tea. Guidelines for keeping record of the export of duty-free tea are included in the

Open Document