In schools, Dodgeball has been played for many years and students have figured out the strong and the weak. Imagine people in high school or middle school going into a gym where it is hot and sweaty. They are choosing two teams and it ends up as the weak vs. the strong. Then they start the game and all the stronger people start to throw the balls which knock all the weak players out and they fall to the ground. Then that will seem like the stronger are picking on the weaker. Dodgeball should be banned from physical education. In dodgeball, it's set to be the weak vs. the strong typically. The article ‘’Position on Dodgeball..’’ states, ‘’Many times these students who are eliminated first are also the ones with the least amount of confidence …show more content…
They could possibly then start to not do good and their classes or at anything at school because it might have a hard effect on them. If we keep letting it be allowed then this could be a serious consequence and your child's life if they are some of the weaker ones. ‘’Position on Dodgeball in physical education the states,’’Some kids may like it - the most skilled, the most confident.But many do not! Certainly not the student who gets hit hard in the stomach, head, or groin. And it's not appropriate to teach our children that you win by hurting others’’(pg. 2). That is telling us if we don't solve this problem more of the weaker kids are going to have low self- esteem and get hurt from all the ball that they are getting hit with. Also, it’s letting the people know that the most skilled players are going to just pick on them on and off of the dodgeball floor. That’s why we should not allow this game of dodgeball. Others might think that dodgeball should be allowed to be played in their child's physical education at school. ‘’The Weak Shall Inherit the Gym’’, states that ‘’Dodgeball is one of the few times in life when you get to let out your aggressions, no questions asked, we don’t need less dodgeball in schools, we need more!’’(Reilly 2). That is proving to use that they feel the need to allow this because it lets them get out there aggressions on the weaker kids. That is telling the people who don't want to allow it to do something about it because the others want
Statsky’s Argument is Not Explored Broadly Enough In the article “Children Need to Play, Not Compete” by Jessica Statsky, the author describes how the competitiveness of organized sports that have been popular among many young American children in recent years can have damaging effects on their physical or psychological well-being and proper development. Statsky said an apparent disadvantage of competitive sports is young children’s vulnerability to physical injury. For instance, she mentioned about Professor Tutko’s claim that many contact sports such as tackle football are physically harmful for young children. Besides that, children’s fear of getting hurt can also discourage them from engaging in sports activities as she refers to
Jessica put it rightly when she gives an example of the game where parents started fighting with each other over a children's game. All of this leads to making children feel like that the sport is more sort of a job where they have to prove themselves rather than something they could
Concentrating on winning or losing spoils the fun that games hold. In addition, equal chances should be provided to every child to participate. Competitive nature can assist the children in their life later on, but the focus should be on better mental and physical health. (204 words) Response In “Children Need to Play, Not Compete,” the author has described sports as one of the ways that enhance mental and physical heath.
Thesis Statement Kids are literally just dying to play football. This project is intended to dissect the reason why children playing football can sustain a traumatic brain injury. Youth football can cause traumatic brain injuries. This exposes why football is damaging to kids. Methodology The first step I took toward researching my project was, choosing a topic.
Authors utilize techniques such as ethos, pathos, and logos throughout stories to support their claims. In the articles “Position on Dodgeball in Physical Education,” by The National Association for Sport and Physical Education, and “The Weak Shall Inherit the Gym,” by Rick Reilly, both authors consistently use persuasive techniques to support their claims about the relevance of dodgeball in physical education classes. Using a more formal approach to the topic the authors of “Position on Dodgeball in Physical Education,” the NASPE, employ the persuasive techniques of pathos and ethos. For instance, the article starts off with the NASPE saying they “would like to reiterate [their] position about including dodgeball in school [pe] programs” (986). The group says this insinuating that they have already given their opinions.
But, according to , kids are now being thought new and enhanced techniques of playing the sport. The chances of injuries and concussions are rapidly decreasing. Therefore, kids should be allowed to play the sport. Moreover, it has been proven through many studies that active kids do better in school.
Contact sports have more negative effects than positive effects and due to this kids should stop playing contact
If you have ever been in sports or school athletics, act fast! Schools are getting rid of their sports and we need to stop it. “Being a student is harder than ever. You are being held to tougher academic standards-and so is your school.
Dr. Frank L. Smoll states, “All children and youth need vigorous physical activity as part of their daily lives, and sports provide the benefits of exercise and the potential for acquiring a sense of accomplishment.” (Smoll 1/2).
2.6 million sports related emergency room visits a year; 25,376 children under 19 sent to the emergency room for traumatic brain injury each year (Merkel). Contact sports, a sport in which the participants necessarily come into bodily contact with one another, like football have become more popular among children and they have started to play the sport at earlier ages as well. Although physical activity is beneficial in many ways, contact sports creates many health risks: concussions, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, brain damage, broken bones, and broken growth plates. Because of all of these risks, contact sports should be banned for people under 18. To begin, contact sports should be banned for children under 18 because of the risk of
Children tend get bullied where there is little to no adult supervision. Some of the most common places are not only playgrounds, but also in cafeterias, hallways, bathrooms, and locker rooms. Aggressive behavior at times can be intense, even when its rates of occurrence are low. Although the rate of aggression on playgrounds and at recess are incredibly low, hurting a child physically or mentally should never be tolerated. As a supplement to recess, physical education was given a deep consideration.
This can be seen in “What Are the Benefits of Competitive Sports for Youth?” by Sarah Davis who states “Participating in sports teaches children and teenagers how to compete in the real world. As they grow older they'll face competition in school, in the workforce and other areas of life. But these competitions don't have to be negative or unhealthy. Playing sports can help kids understand how competition works in a friendly environment, and that if you try your hardest, you have a better chance to succeed”(Davis 2). This illustrates how competition is in any child’s life and sports just make them more prepared for said
To most kids and students, competitive sports are a gateway to blow off some steam or to have fun. To parents, the sports that their children play and the lessons that they teach are an important part of their development and life. Despite what many ‘experts’ would like you to believe, both of these statements are completely true. I believe that kids should be allowed to play competitive sports due to the health benefits, the lessons that they can teach, and as a result of the advanced equipment and rules that are focused on making sports safe, as well as the fact that sports can keep kids out of trouble. One extremely important reason that forces me to take the position that kids should be allowed to compete in competitive sports is the health benefits that children who play sports recieve.
Children being vulnerable to harmful situations, such as the ones listed above, is one of the main reasons that the total number of children participating in competitive sports has been diminishing over the last few
Children are playing just to win and the real spirit of the game fades out. (Word count: 196) Response I strongly agree with the point of Jessica Statsky in “Children Need to Play, Not Compete”. The way Statsky explains the facts by referring to other people is not questionable. The parents forcefully ask their children to join sports for the development of their bodies and mind.