Hobby Lobby Summary

Stocking of Hobby Lobby shelves Hobby Lobby is a prominent arts and crafts store but also sells fabric and home decor items. With over 500 locations nationwide and a loyal customer base. As a result, Hobby Lobby must stock its shelves perfectly for easy to find merchandise. Tools required include; boxes, cutter, and

The Hobby Lobby store filed the case against the Secretary Department of Health and Human Services stating that the contraceptive method doesn’t match their religious faith. In fact, they were requested to pay the insurance fee. For them, they said that paying for contraception under the Affordable Care Act contradict the federal law protecting religious freedom. According to IIT Chicago College of Law (n.d.), the contraception requirement set by the government were against some religious policies.

For the class project, I chose to research Hobby Lobby. Hobby Lobby interests me because the owners run their business according to their beliefs. When laws go in effect that counter their beliefs, they fight for their beliefs and stand up to the government. David and Barbara Green stand up for what they believe in and run one of the top three craft and hobby stores in the nation. David and Barbara Green are the founders and owners of Hobby Lobby.

The Greens argued that following the contraceptive mandate of the ACA would violate their religious ideals ("Burwell v. Hobby Lobby"). More specifically, the Greens felt it would violate their genuine belief that human life begins at the moment of conception (Morgan). Hence, the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case was

Opinion: I believe with the ruling. I am on the same page with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. I agree 100% with his writing for the court, which stated that family-owned companies like Hobby Lobby should not be enforced to recompense for insurance coverage for contraception for workers over their religious oppositions. I believe that this ruling is accurate because it means that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 is efficient and does what it says that it does.

The government gave the Green family an unfair choice. They could either provide the contraceptives and go against their faith or they would have to pay high dollar fines. The Court saw this as an unfair punishment and thus ruled in their favor. Barbara Green, co-owner of Hobby Lobby, said: “Today the nation’s highest court has re-affirmed the vital importance of religious liberty as one of our country’s founding principles.” (The Decision, hobbylobbycase.com).

The Contraceptive mandate case is a very important case for the diversity of our country. This case deals with Hobby Lobby’s Christian faith. Hobby Lobby is a very religious corporation, but does not offer free insurance coverage to its employees because it’s against their religion. . A business or corporation has the same rights of political and religious expression as individuals. Since President Obama’s health care law took action it now requires health insurance to be provided to all employees.

The Supreme Court case struck down the Massachusetts law that claimed that only married couples could obtain contraceptives that registered doctors or pharmacists provided. The Court stated that the law did not satisfy the rational basis test offered by the 14th Amendment. Perhaps one of the most widely known and controversial Supreme Court cases regarding contraceptives, Roe v. Wade still gains attention in legal debates today. The Supreme Court stated that by banning a woman’s right to an abortion, Texas violated her constitutional rights. Women hold the right to an abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy under their 14th Amendment rights.

For years republicans have been trying to defund Planned Parenthood, and at this moment in history, they are closer towards their goal than ever. With a republican majority senate, and a republican as president, the fight to defund Planned Parenthood only faces minimal resistance. Republicans, more specifically the Trump Administration, like to hide behind their religious beliefs and values when it comes to their ideas regarding Planned Parenthood. They tend to only focus aspects that they disagree with while paying no mind to the good that Planned Parenthood does. These republicans that are working to defund Planned Parenthood and oppose Planned Parenthood so strongly tend to only focus on the belief that defunding Planned Parenthood would

Under the Affordable Care Act, employers have to provide health care for their employees at no cost (Fuller, 2014). Along with Conestoga Wood Specialities, Hobby Lobby felt like this law was violating their religious freedom under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Fuller, 2014). The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 states that the government cannot restrict an individual’s religious freedom (Hobby). More specifically, the issue at hand in the lawsuit against the Health and Human Service (HHS) Mandate, was whether for-profit corporations have a right to exercise their religious freedom under the Restoration Freedom Act (Fuller, 2014). After many hearings in court and prayers from the Green family, the case was taken to the highest court in the land (Fuller-Gryboski, 2014).

Planned Parenthood is a topic that is continuously discussed in correlation with the concept of money as many believe that it “...emphasizes abortions instead of preventative care” (Attira). Because of birthrights, abortions, and the controversy that surrounds such issues, many individuals believe that the government should not be responsible for providing funding. Therefore, actually defunding Planned Parenthood is often brought up as a solution to the highly-debated consensus of government-funded healthcare services. Although many believe that creating a barrier between opinion and action is a positive push, actually defunding the program would be more catastrophic than perceived. Defunding Planned Parenthood would mean blocking and preventing individuals from receiving the health care that they are reliant on.

Whose choice is it? Organizations such as “Planned Parenthood” are telling people that abortions are completely fine for pregnant women to get. There are many “Pro-Life” groups opposed to this program. Abortion is not morally correct because it is unfair to children that do not have a choice, a fetus is still human, and killing humans is murder, and couples can prevent pregnancy with birth control or abstinence. Pro abortionists argue that women should have a choice in whether or not they want a child.

Before Roe v. wade the number of deaths from illegal abortions was around 5000 and in the 50s and 60s the number of illegal abortions ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year. These illegal abortions pose major health risks to the life of the woman including damage to the bladder, intestines as well as rupturing of the uterus. The choice to become a mother must be given to the woman most importantly because it’s her body, her health, and she will be taking on a great responsibility. A woman’s choice to choose abortion should not be restricted by anyone; there are multiple reasons why abortion will be the more sensible decision for the female.

This decision seems very strange to people that are pronatalists, who are often older adults, men, and people that are not very well educated. Functionalists would most likely support pronatalism. They believe

Culture and Religion seem to be working hand in hand in society, when looking at culture we look at characteristics and knowledge of a particular group of people, defined by everything from language, religion, food, social habits (things that are done natural e.g. saying please and thank you), music and arts. With religion people often use the word to mean the worship of a god or gods. However, some religions do not have gods. One thing that all religions have in common is that they help their believers to find meaning and comfort in the world by using some aspects from that particular religion. With culture and religion playing a big role in our everyday and life choices contraceptives go against a lot of cultural and religion choices and