How Did Napoleon And The Pigs Absolute Control Animal Farm

563 Words3 Pages

Napoleon and the pigs' absolute control over the animals solely was so unbalanced because of the intelligence barriers that the animals had. The pigs were always the animals that kind of ran the joint, so when they ended up being dictators doesn't seem too far-fetched. The whole takeover of the pigs was only because the pigs were generally smarter than the animals; Animals on the farm would get lied to every other day. In spite of Napoleon's violence the animals would have been better off if they were as smart as the pigs because, They would have understood squealers slides, known when the rules had been changed, and would have been able to read the book for the windmill on their own. Counter argument: Even if the animals were just as smart as the pigs, Napoleon would have just intimidated them into being quiet with his dogs. Napoleon was a dictator so he could basically just murk everybody. Napoleon was already kind of scared of an uprising from the animals. He was extremely scared of boxers and how strong he was, why else would Napoleon have to sell him to the glue factory. For example, Napoleon was already scared of Boxer, he was able to kick his dogs and overpower him easily. …show more content…

When squealers were talking about how “plentiful” the food was on the farm to the humans, if the animals were smarter than they could have easily told that wasn't the case for the farm.After squealer speaks of a lie the narrator states that , “Squealer was soon able to convince them their memories had been their fault.” p.98 Squealer easily lied to the animals because of their failure of intellect. Squealer and the pigs will continue this lying facade to all the animals and they will never

Open Document