The Australian Political Policy changed in 1975, mainly due to the Vietnam War. After the war between North and South Vietnam, thousands of Vietnamese immigrants migrated to Australia bearing their own political views. The original policy, impacted a larger, broader reach of Australian Society, especially the selected migrants living in Australian capital cities. Prior to the Vietnam War, Vietnam was a democratic nation. After the change of political leadership, there was a dramatic change in critical leaders that were in power previously (source 1).The change in leadership turned Vietnam into an intense war zone. The first wave of immigrants mainly consisted of South Vietnamese government officials and military personal (source 1). The use …show more content…
Canada and the United States started large and successful international agreement and discussion during 1965 (source 4). Australia and the rest of the world forcibly constrained the amount of unregistered migrants from the Vietnamese war zone. An Orderly Departure Program was put into action to regulate the amount of registered Vietnamese migrants into countries all around the world especially Australia. Overall all Vietnamese migrants that arrived in Australia have a say in government and are appointed a representative in the Upper house in Canberra and Western Australia (source 4). As the numbers of Vietnamese migrants increased they were apprehended and then accepted in later …show more content…
Multiculturism was a policy that Australia wanted to put into place that aimed to recognise differences whilst still maintaining differences in ethnic, cultural and linguistic communities (source 6). The overall impact of immigration to Australia changed Australia’s demography after WWII, it then increased dramatically after the Vietnam War. After the largest wave of Vietnamese immigrants between the years of 1972 and 1992, the new policy of multiculturism was deemed to have minimised the amount of socially orientated conflict. (Source 1&6). The cultural policy was also changed to help signal Australia’s ability to assist after settlement in the ethnic identification of most immigrants (source 1). The large amount of Vietnamese migrants that arrived in Australia was seen as a test, for both the policies and eventual ending of multicultural
Question 1 and mini-questions Who is Charlie Teo? https://www.curebraincancer.org.au/page/58/charlie-teo Charlie Teo is a Prof in brain surgery. He was the first person who discovered brain cancer.
Their leader Chris Watson warns about racial contamination along with his party colleague Billy Hughes who adds more fuel to the situation by demanding a White Australia. This new law had to be approved by the Britain, secretary of the colonies Joseph Chamberlin agrees with the dictation test but says he’ll not support an outright ban on non-white immigrants. On the 26th of September 1901 the vote is taken and the immigration Restriction Act is officialised. The first people to be immediately deported back under this new legislation were the Pacific islanders who worked on the sugar cane plantations. They were brought from the South Pacific to work as slaves, they were tricked and fooled into coming to Australia.
Prior to the legislation of the Immigration policy, the current white Australian policy was perceived as being anti-Asian, which had the possibility of significantly harming Australia’s trade with Asian countries. By the 1960s, the policy was gradually becoming extinct with the admittance of certain skilled immigrants and accompanying people from Asia – often those who had been trained
The 1970s was a decade of change for Australia. Many issues were talked about including immigration, war, sexual morality, the role of women and the environment. Gough Whitlam had a huge role on shaping Australia and made some amazing changes. Whitlam was Australia’s prime minister from 1972 to 1975. During his time as prime minister he changed rights involving women’s equal pay and maternity leave as well as removing Australian troops from the Vietnam war, introducing free university education and lowered the voting age.
Why was Australian society divided over the issue of our involvement in the Vietnam War between 1965 and 1972? The Vietnam War (November 1, 1955 – April 30, 1975) was a very controversial and different war. Throughout out the duration of it, this war divided Australian society, affected by things such as conscription, the role of the media in the war and the television horrors that were broadcasted back to the Australian population and many other issues that raised tensions between the politicians and the citizens of Australia. Although this war was notorious for the conflict and arguments between the population and the politicians, there were still some significant and justifiable reasons to commit troops to the war effort.
Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War On the 28th of April 1965 Prime Minister Robert Menzies announced that Australian troops would be sent to fight in the Vietnam War. There was a great divide in Australian society over this decision as many people supported the decision and many people opposed it. However as the war went on and became the longest war Australia was ever involved in, more and more people joined the opposing side and joined the Moratorium movement (an anti-war movement.)
Cabramatta was modest until the Vietnam War had ended in the 1970 's. After the Whitlam government had passed the Racial Discrimination Act, and the White Australia Policy was dropped and Vietnam migrated in Australia and placed in Cabramatta as a refuge from the war( Cabramatta). Cabramatta is known for its rich culture and variety of population living in the place. However, The largest Vietnamese community in Australia is found in Cabramatta (source).
The One Nation Party (ONP) is not an aberration within Australian political life; historically ethnonationalistic movements and parties have long been present within the Australian political landscape. The New Guard, the Centrist Party, the Australia First Party, and the Australian National Socialist Party (ANSP) to name just a few. The presence of ethnonationalistic movements within Australia is ultimately a result of ‘unique phenomena growing out of specific political, social and economic conditions’ and requires ‘an examination of national contexts’ in order to ascertain why they exist and proliferate within not only Australia, but many other industrialised Western nations. To this end, a review regarding the emergence of the ONP will be
During World War 2 (1939 – 1945), Australia had a variety of impacts on both its government and its people. The war had a great effect on the place of indigenous people in Australia as indigenous men and women joined services throughout the country. The Aboriginal Australians, both the men and the women had contributed in the second Great War. Meanwhile, when the Aboriginals of Australia had jobs during World War 2, Australia’s economy boomed with the help of the war as many Australian troops had gone out to fight for the British. The economy had boomed during the period of the Second World War as Australian products could be produced as well.
Introduction Australia is said to be a multicultural and multiracial country. So why can’t we, as a country and as a nation, say yes to immigrants fleeing from a different country? As immigration to Australia is supposably apart of our history and it would be wrong not to continue on with the actions of our ancestors. Paragraph 1 As of 2014 – 2015, Australia accepted 13,750 refugees in total. Paragraph 2 • What are refugees and asylum seekers?
Commencing in the terminating stages of 1941 was the Pacific war. A war which can now be considered not solely a pivotal moment for many nations in the world but also one of high significance for Australia too. Due to the traumatic occurrences throughout the Pacific War Australia was ultimately transformed into a nation which possessed equally more strength and confidence all of which blossomed from victories as well as new allies. However, the Pacific War also birthed and manifested a more immature and racist nation.
Making a Nation Eureka Stockade Eureka Stockade was an incident that happened in 1854, started with Australia trying to force the gold mining license which transformed into 30 shillings a month. Which was a lot of money backed, then So a lot of the people weren't happy about it, that is basically how the eureka stockade started. The miners didn't feel happy about having to pay so much to mine gold, many of them didn't gain anything. Quite the opposite some people started to lose money, so all of them was getting readied for a fight.
The Vietnam War started in 1962 and ended in 1972. After the war in 1975, communists gained control over the North and South Vietnam. Vietnam declared independence after World War 2. France still ruled until 1954 defeat by communist forces under Ho Chi Minh. When the communist jailed Vietnamese people they took their freedom and religion away from them.
Indigenous Australians, in many states, were denied full citizenship on grounds of their race. Migration laws were set up at every opportunity to support "white" European outsiders to Australia. However, gradual change in people’s perceptions began in the late 1960 's. Racism all through the 1960 's impacted the characters in the way that it improved certain qualities, and got the perusers to additionally comprehend the characters themselves, and in addition feel certain feelings towards them. Supremacist mentalities and activities are obvious all through the novel. For instance, the Lu family are over and over separated because of the way that they are Vietnamese migrants.
As the world grew more populated, to many Australians it seemed that Great Britain was both a physically long way and also very different to Australia. The Australia of pre World War II was now very different to the Australia colonised by the British so many years earlier. In 1919, Australia had, for the very first time, been considered a fully self-governing nation and was asked independently of Great Britain to be a part of the Treaty of Versailles (Carrodus, Delany and McArthur, 2012). Prior to this, Britain was responsible for all political agreements for Australia (Museum of Australian Democracy).