Hrm/531 Week 4

Ms. Tomcala, Chief Executive Officer, announced that Ms. Pat McClelland is leaving the Health Plan after 20 years of service and that she has accepted a position with DHCS as Chief of the Systems of Care Division. Ms. Tomcala also reported on audit readiness and that WeiserMazars has been coaching the team on how to address the auditors who will be onsite the last two weeks of April. Ms. Tomcala brought to the committee’s attention that DHCS has officially requested CMS to approve the MCO tax proposal. Lastly, Ms. Tomcala continues to have discussions with County representatives Mr. Bruce Butler and Mr. Paul Lorenz regarding the Default PCP Assignments and they have reached to Ms. Dolores Alvarado, SCCHA Board member, to ask for her assistance.

What I did – I reviewed 10 employee expense reports to determine if corresponding receipts were attached and approvals had been provided, and I also assessed whether reported payments were eligible for reimbursement based on Schnitzer Steel Accounting Manual Section 300-10 (Expense Report Approval Procedure and Supporting Documentation Requirement) and 300-20(Expense Report Eligibility Requirement). After two exceptions were identified, I pulled 40 more employee expense reports based on Schnitzer Steel Internal Audit Manual – Chapter 2: Sampling Methodology to determine if the exceptions were isolated instances or systemic issues. What I found – Within the initial 10 expense reports, I found two exceptions. Specifically, Sample No.7 with a total amount over $1,000 did not have required evidence of second approval from a department head, and Sample No.9 was missing one receipt.

Discuss these 2 scenarios and outcomes; 1: Your computer just crashed. It is 5 years old and not worth fixing. You have not more than $1,000 to spend on a new computer but the lowest price that you can find either online or in a local store for the model that you absolutely need is $1,100. What would you say to the salesperson to convince him or her to sell you the computer for $1,000.00 Consider objections that the sales representative might make and how you would respond to them?

60A. (1) Except as hereinafter provided for the employee cannot to be required under their own contract of service to work— (a) more than 5 consecutive hours without a period of leisure of not less than 30 minutes duration; (b) In one day more than eight hours; (c) In excess of a spread over period of 10 hours in one day; (d) In one week more than forty-eight hours: Provided that—(i) for the purpose of paragraph (1)(a), for the break less than thirty minutes in the five consecutive hours should not break the continuity of that five consecutive hours; (ii) Employee that they are engaged in work which have to carried on constantly and which requires their continual attendance may be required to work for eight consecutive hours inclusive of a

Mary Ann and Jack Gaffney told me to update them also, Jane Volk told me with giving me a letter and business card that employees couldn't harass or retaliate against me Ron Hartman echoed the same. I started referring to sections in the contract or University Policies when Mary Ann started quoting or emailed them to me with little support from the union or university. I couldn’t believe Pitt or the Union would let this go on Franicola, Supervisor and Donna Myers, Maintenance told several employees the University and union were making deals together Also; this wasn’t a real Union is that why they weren’t acknowledging my email? The Union or University wouldn’t take responsibility for Franicola coercing employees against each other and the favoritism. Yes,

Critical Element 1: TITLE: Cash Verification (CV) Financial Reviews S: Conduct and complete mandated CV reviews on negotiable instruments and other assets to ensure sound financial management. Provide advice, education and training to appointed collection agents and departments to ensure fund management efficiency/effectiveness, ensuring strong internal management controls are practiced. M: Conduct 24 reviews; prepare reports, ensure RM is briefed and afforded an opportunity to respond to report results; report results to the CO in a timely manner; follow-up on any reported findings in subsequent reviews.

Business Issue In an attempt to reunite the company after being geographically separated for seven months, my company commander decided to create a rotation between several of the employees. While the intentions of the switch were pure, the implementation created immense manning requirements on my organization. Due to travel schedules, my organization was going to have multiple days with employee shortages, forcing my employees to work double shifts instead of having a rest day; the same was not true for the other entity of the company. Consequentially, I had to negotiate with my commander in order to resolve the scenario.

1. How likely will the patient be more willing to cooperate with the innovation? 2. How likely will the innovation fit easily into the current rules & regulations? 3.

Target 1: Reduce the unemployment rate by at least half the current rate. It is unemployment that leads to poverty. Target 2: Enable access to clean water and sanitization to everyone, this is a basic human right, not a luxury. Target 3: Improve the income redistribution of social grants amongst minors, single mothers and minors.

The Little Albert experiment was a case study showing empirical evidence of classical conditioning in humans. The study also provides an example of stimulus generalization. It was carried out by John B. Watson and his graduate student, Rosalie Rayner, at Johns Hopkins University. The results were first published in the February 1920 issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology. After observing children in the field, Watson hypothesized that the fearful response of children to loud noises is an innate unconditioned response.

According to Mcleod (2023), he emphasizes that Watson did not desensitize Albert to his fear of rats. Therefore, not only was Albert put through about ten days of fear and torture of loud noises, but he was not able to get over the fear. This experiment went against another principle in the APA Code of Conduct. The American Psychological Association (2017) states in their Principle D: Justice section, that psychologist should recognize justice entitled to all people and know their boundaries and limitations. As the leader of this experiment, Watson needed to consider how he was basing his experiment on a baby.

Many people in the company need access to data to help them do their job better. The main questions revolve around who needs what data, and who chooses what data gets to be shared. Looking at all the pieces, as well as the IT and information assets, the governance of the data belongs to a data owner (Khatri & Brown, 2010). The main questions to be answered must include who is the data owner? Who is responsible for data quality?

Milgram’s procedures for his experiment was easy, The teacher is told to administer an electric shock every time the learner makes a mistake, increasing the level of shock each time. There were 30 switches on the shock generator marked from 15 volts (slight shock) to 450 (danger – severe shock).The learner gave mainly wrong answers (on purpose) and for each of these the teacher gave him

The fact that they were causing someone pain was extremely embarrassing to the participants to the extreme that they went to heights of avoidance to look at the consequences of what they had done, despite of the fact they got electric shocks. All these factors collaborate to make the study unethical in some views; as such ardent distress cannot be forgotten or fade off just by merely being told that the entire study was a deception. After the experiment was concluded, there was a compromise made between the teacher and learner to prove no iniquity was done and a debriefing from the experimenter, to help participants to know what the study was actually about. There was no sufficient psychological support or evidence for any enduring effects that may have been rooted by the experiment, which counts against the study as the participant’s long-term sanity Though many find the use of electrical shocks to be obnoxious, electric shocks are not a new concept to many psychological experiments. It is widely convinced that certain levels of ‘pain with no harm’ are a small price to pay for scientific knowledge and new discoveries.

1. What problems did you encounter when handling the complaint? Whenever I received complaints, the problem is that the subordinates usually deny or come up with some explanations making it difficult to discuss it in a genuine manner. Sometimes even if we reprimand them for their mistakes it creates a very tense environment in the hospital and it also affects the quality of work.