Im A Semi-Vegetarian Analysis

The objective of the film was to influence viewers to switch to a plant-based diet while avoiding animal consumption. Anderson and Kuhn utilize various visual techniques and rhetorical appeals to ethos and logos to support their argument that the causes of many diseases can be linked back to diet. While the film uses clear rhetorical techniques to present its argument, the overall argument is ineffective due to its broad claim and distorted presentation of positions. The first rhetorical strategy used by the film that will be analyzed is the appeal to pathos. An example of this would be the woman crying because she has to take medicine for the rest of her life.

In An Animal’s Place, Michael Pollan describes the growing acknowledgement of animal rights, particularly America’s decision between vegetarianism and meat-eating. However, this growing sense of sentiment towards animals is coupled with a growing sense of brutality in farms and science labs. According to Pollan, the lacking respect for specific species of animals lies in the fact that they are absent from human’s everyday lives; enabling them to avoid acknowledgment of what they are doing when partaking in brutality towards animals. He presents arguments for why vegetarianism would make sense in certain instances and why it would not and ultimately lead to the decision of eating-meat while treating the animals fairly in the process. Pollan

Once Jonathan and his wife had children, they decided to raise them as vegetarians, mainly to avoid possible dangers of eating meat including toxins and misleading labels on animal products. Jonathan and his family believe that their diet is as enjoyable and healthy as the average western diet. Jonathan is very open minded towards the diet his children choose to have as they grow older. However, he would rather them maintain a vegetarian diet like he and his wife

I did not understand the solution to the problem of being a “conscientious meat eater.” The authors never really stated or concluded an answer to the problem in the article. In the text it says “For many people who care about the environment and animal welfare, choosing to eat humanely raised meat seems like an option.” This argues that only an option to the solution is informed to the reader, and that there is no real solution to the problem at hand. The whole point of the article, “Is It Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater”, is to inform the reader about the issue about meat, but because there is no solution to his argument; it makes his argument less effect as a whole when persuading

Joel Salatin, the Polyface Farms owner, has a strong opinion on how necessary it is to have a healthy area for animals to be raised in order for everyone to have food on their tables that was well taken care of. Salatin is arguing the fact that organic animals should be used among all Americans. Within the video, the farm owner uses pathos by stating the fact the chickens never see chlorine on his farm and do not get plump as they do in large factories. Along with that, Joel brought up the fact that the cows are able to graze the farms and fertilize on their own rather than having machine made products. On top of pathos, the speaker uses ethos to catch the audiences attention.

The consumption of red meat has increased significantly in recent years. The link between red meat consumption and climate change is greatly evident. Therefore, this issue may be considered positive for various stakeholders, while also having a negative impact on others. Not only is the consumption of meat a major contributor to climate change, but the production of the meat consumed influences the climate as well. Livestock produces a considerable amount of greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide, which accounts for more than 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.

He presents a compelling argument for why we have to recall lowering or casting off our intake of animal products, the use of evidence and records to guide his claims. for example, Foer cites the fact that animal agriculture is chargeable for more greenhouse gas emissions than all kinds of transportation combined. via presenting this statistic in a clean and concise manner, Foer makes a robust case for the environmental blessings of lowering our meat consumption. Foer additionally appeals to our sense of morality and values. He emphasizes the significance of compassion and duty in our food choices, encouraging readers to remember the ethical implications of consuming meat.

As diets and health become more and more of a public concern in America. Two authors weigh in on their opinions on how the American public should handle the problem of obesity as well as their solutions to the overwhelming issue. In one article, “Against Meat,” published on the New York Times website in 2009, points out that the solution to obesity should be vegetarianism. Johnathan Foer who is a vegetarian, claims that his diet and way of living is his the way of improving health in the American public. Foer’s article provides a sense of humor as well as personal stories to attempt to persuade his audience for the ethical treatment of animals along with his personal solution for his own health and the health of his family.

Beyond Meat which is in the plant-based meat industry is an unattractive industry to venture. The food industry is a competitive industry, and the plant-based industry is viewed as subindustry to the overall food industry. When evaluating Beyond Meat as a plant-based industry, they look attractive based on their high stock price and growing revenue (p.7), however Beyond meat has dominated their industry with essentially being one of two companies leading the industry and investing heavily into their company. For new entrants this is an unattractive industry because of high capital requirements to catch up to companies like Beyond Meat. Also with extremely low concentration of suppliers to this industry firms “Beyond Meat relying on two different

In today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.

Veganism and Vegetarianism is a special diet that is intended to lessen some or all food intake involved with animals. A common misconception is that all people who become vegetarian or vegans is out of choice but that is false because some people are allergic to specific or all types of meat. Moreover, the personal benefit of pursuing vegetarianism or veganism of these diets is often overlooked. Furthermore, the diet of a vegan excludes all animal products, whereas a vegetarian diet excludes meat, poultry, fish or eggs. These diet plans can have healthy benefits for the consumer if they are planned out.

“I asked myself a question: "Knowing what I know, why am I not a vegetarian?"’ Graham Hill, an inspiring speaker, introduced a new way to eat. During his speech on TED Talk, he explains to his audience how eating meat has affected the world. In a calm and humorous tone, Hill proposes his purpose. He explains to his audience by becoming a “weekday veg” you will live a better live, it’s great compromise that will help people, animals, and the environment.

Over the past years, the average global temperature on Earth has increased significantly due to gas emissions. The demand for fruits, meats and other sources of food has been rising rapidly and respectively with the increase in Earth’s temperature due to increase in gas emissions in the atmosphere and the expanding global population. More significantly, countries with huge amounts of population growth, such as the United States, China, India, and the European Union have greater demand for food, which has higher carbon footprints. For example, China with 9040.74 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions, and is number for fuel combustion. 1 The problem is that people do not know that switching to vegetarianism can help reduce the causes of global warming, which means what you eat can affect how the world will be in the future.

Vegan is defined as a person who does not eat/use animal products. Lots of people don’t know the differences between vegetarian and vegan. Many think they are the same thing. They have one main difference, which is that vegetarians only don’t eat meat, and vegans don’t eat or use any animal products whatsoever. People argue that being vegan is better for the environment, saves money, and reduces animal cruelty, while others argue that being vegan doesn’t fix animal cruelty, can be expensive, and that being vegan is unhealthy.

In a world of increasing pollution and decreasing immunity, more and more people are turning to alternative, sustainable dietary lifestyles– the most dominant of which are veganism and organicity. Despite both addressing environmental sustainability, both also tackle two different aspects of food security and moral codes– the former of basic human ethics, and the latter of genetically modified foods. Veganism is a way of living that excludes all possible forms of animals products in not only food choices but also clothing and other purposes. Organic food on the other hand, is defined by the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) as food “produced by farmers who emphasise the use of renewable resources and the conservation of soil and water” by