Juvenile Court Case: Kent Vs. United States

I agree with the Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) case because she should be able to wear headbands and bracelets and simple things. I'm not saying you can wear anything and say anything but i'm saying that you should be able to wear the simple, appropriate things. I agree with the Kent v. United States (1966) case because if he can do adult crimes he should be able to pay the price. I think that if you do something that hurts other or taking what's not yours, you should pay the price for your actions.

I believe this case should have at least been sent back by an appeal court and tried again. The state of ohio should have lost the case because it was unreasonable to search a man that was walking around a street corner and immediately pat him down and use illegal evidence in the case. Chief justice warren should have seen the fact that detective mcfadden knew he was going to be on that stake out and he should have recognized that he needed to go get a search warrant just in case he needed to search the men. Detective mcfadden was out of line in my eyes by searching the men without a warrant from a judge. If he would have gotten a warrant i would be completely in agreement with him and the 8 justices that ruled in favor of detective mcfadden, knowing that he in fact did not have any legal reasoning to search the men makes it hard for me to agree with the justices that ruled in his favor.

Stanford V. Kentucky The juvenile justice system has had many famous court cases, such as Kent V. United States, Breed V. Jones, Eddings V. Oklahoma and many more. There comes times when the supreme court comes across very difficult decisions. The one court case that stands out from the rest is Stanford V. Kentucky. This court case was brought to light around June,1989, and the end result was the minimum age for the death penalty was set at 16 years old.

Thesis Green v. New Kent County was an important court case from 1968 dealing with desegregation in schools. Calvin Green convinced the court to establish the laws from Brown v. Board of Ed into action, giving better opportunities to all students of all races. Background Charles C. Green attended George W. Watkins school during Green v. New Kent. Schools across Virginia didn’t acknowledge the rules set in Brown, two of them being George W. Watkins for black students and New Kent for whites.

How Significant are the decisions from the Marshall Court in American History? Marbury V. Madison- It was significant because it was the first Supreme court case that used the principle of judicial review. It was also significant because this case was the first case that played a key role in making the supreme court a separate branch of the government.

The judgement of this case was

Before taking a look at this case, think about the following questions. Do students have the same rights under the 4th amendment as adults? , What are students’ rights while being searched on school grounds?, and What guidelines do administrators and teachers need to follow as a result of New Jersey v. T.L.O? The case of New Jersey vs T.L.O involved two freshmen high schoolers who were caught using narcotics in the restroom by a teacher. The teacher took the students to the principal who then asked the students about the incident.

The court case Roper v. Simmons was a case that questioned whether or not the execution of a juvenile violated the Constitution. This case began in 2002 and was appealed and decided in 2005. This was a Missouri case that involved Christopher Simmons, who at the time was only seventeen years old. As a punishment for a crime that he committed, Simmons was given the death penalty. Simmons tried many times to appeal his case and avoid being executed.

Nevertheless, Chief Justice John Marshall, through his genius was able bring the judicial branch on par with the legislative and executive branches with the self-imposed power of judicial review. With a masterful legal opinion in the Marbury case, Marshall created a system of common law review, which set the legal standard for future cases like Dred Scott v. Sanford and Brown v. Board of Education (O’Brien 167). The outcome of these cases has impacted the lives of Americans over the years. People’s will and desire has evolved over time, from a racially structured society in the 1800’s to the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. The moral views of Americans have changed over time, with a positive collective will.

As time has progressed, the United States has continuously changed to meet the needs of its people. With each passing day, the country has slowly shifted away from what it had been initially as created by our forefathers. One reason for this transformation has been the nation’s judicial branch which has influenced the course of social and reform movements, as well as our ideologies and beliefs. The court rulings under Earl Warren are evidence that the judicial branch is a powerful force that can be a catalyst for change.

The United States Supreme Court was created by our Founders without many enumerated powers. Through legislation and precedent, the Supreme Court’s duties became apparent to the people and the other governing bodies. From judicial review to understanding unstated fundamental rights, the Supreme Court has furthered the American people’s understanding of our founding document, the Constitution. However, when it comes to the social climate of the United States can the Court dramatically change the people’s social views? There are two ways that the courts have been seen in allowing or impeding social change to be decided by the Courts.

The Constitution states in Article III, Section 1 that "the judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (uscourts.gov). " Lawsuits among two or more states and cases relating to ambassadors and diplomats are examples of cases where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. The Court also has appellate jurisdiction on virtually any other case that involves violations of constitutional or federal law. Finally, the Supreme Court has the final interpretation of law on all matters concerning the U.S. Constitution, federal laws, and treaties. Consequently, all decisions from Supreme Court have a profound impact on society; even

Since there was no principal plea agreement, the state trial court took his guilty plea and the prosecutor recommended a three-year sentence, made no recommendation about probation, and requested ten days “shock” time in jail; the judge sentenced Frye to three years in prison. 132 S. Ct. at 1404-1405. Frye filed for post-conviction relief in state court claiming that the failure of his attorney to notify him of the prosecution's plea offers denied him the effective assistance of counsel; at an evidentiary hearing Frye testified he would have pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor if he had been made aware about the plea deal offers. 132 S. Ct.

At the age of 19, Gregory Parsons life took a dramatic turn by a shocking miscarriage of justice. On February 15, 1994, he was convicted in Newfoundland, of the second-degree murder of his mother Catherine Carroll, and was sentenced to life in prison with no chsnce of parole for 15 years. Parsons’ conviction was based on circumstantial evidence, and his case was closed by the Crown prosecutor just by simply asking the jury,”If Greg Parsons didn’t cause his mother’s death[,] who did?” Parsons’ life was not easy. His parents separated when he was only six, and was sent to live with Carroll.

The most recent upsurge of concern was brought to wide public attention by Chief Justice Warren Burger in his Sonnett lecture at Fordham Law School in 1973, in which he singled out the problem of inadequate trial advocacy as the area needing