Lincoln And Douglass Debate Analysis

Frederick Douglas, as a slave, lived on a plantation with two other “sister” plantations. The main plantation was so prestigious that a slave would have to be voted on to be able to work on that plantation. Frederick Douglass used an analogy to compare what the political candidate had to do and what a slave had to do to get voted on by the plantation leader.

We established this this country in the first place with strong state government just for that reason, to avoid a central tyranny.” (p. 65). The South looked at the North as a tyrannical government. The North on the other hand looked at the South as trying to tear the country into two. The Union army fought to keep the country together as one, because if the South would win the war it would have split the country into two for good.

Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass are both powerful speakers and influential figures during their times especially during the Civil War in the 1800s. Through their powerful speeches, they spread their ideas through oratory which appealed and captivated their audience with their powerful speeches. Both Lincoln and Douglass have a different standing when concern of their social and political position in the economy, whereas one is the president of the Whig Party and President of the United State during the time of the Civil War and the other one is a runaway slave who devoted his entire life to ending slavery and the Civil Rights of so many African Americans. It can also be said to their different approach on a topic such as slavery. Douglass

He had various strategies. His mistress started to teach him. She was nice to him at first. His mistress went from a kind woman to someone who realized that it is dangerous to teach a slave to read and write. She always had room for the poor, hungry and naked.

hanai Jones 10/28/15 U.S.History 3A Frederick Douglass Essay “How did the reporter build an argument to persuade his audience that Frederick Douglass believed the passage of the 15th amendment did not end the challenges for African Americans in being treated equal?” How did the reporter build an argument that Frederick Douglass believed African Americans needed to take for addition measures of equality to be treated equally?

The South was afraid that if Abraham Lincoln was elected president that he would abolish slavery. That is not necessarily true because Abraham Lincoln had his own slaves but he just wanted to stop the spread of slavery. He did not want slavery to expand into the North or even to the new territories of the West. The South thought that Lincoln would abolish slavery and the South did not want to do that because they thought that the North would have too much power and they did not want to relinquish all of that power to the North. The slaves in the South were making their slaves owners a lot of money by working hard and not being paid for it.

Abraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.

The autobiography, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, written in 1845 in Massachusetts, narrates the evils of slavery through the point of view of Frederick Douglass. Frederick Douglass is a slave who focuses his attention into escaping the horrors of slavery. He articulates his mournful story to anyone and everyone, in hopes of disclosing the crimes that come with slavery. In doing so, Douglass uses many rhetorical strategies to make effective arguments against slavery. Frederick Douglass makes a point to demonstrate the deterioration slavery yields from moral, benevolent people into ruthless, cold-hearted people.

After the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the rise of the Republican party, Southerners feared the tipping of the balance of political power against them; their need for self-determination parallel the colonists’ belief of rebelling against the oppressive government of Great Britain. However, the Civil War represented something more: the clash of the feudalistic, agrarian South with the industrialized, capitalistic North. These two powers differed socially, politically, and economically, and were especially conflicted over slavery. These two sections of the United States were divided against one another, and could not survive this way. Therefore, it is more accurate to state that though the Civil War resembled some aspects of the American Revolution, it was a clash between two forces who could not exist with one another in their current state, leading inevitably to conflict between the

Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass are American heroes with each exemplifying a unique aspect of the American spirit. In his recent study, "The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics" (2007), Professor James Oakes traces the intersecting careers of both men, pointing out their initial differences and how their goals and visions ultimately converged. Oakes is Graduate School Humanities Professor and Professor of History at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He has written extensively on the history of slavery in the Old South. Oakes reminds the reader of how much Lincoln and Douglass originally shared.

After being separated from his mother at a young age, Frederick Douglass fights back against slavery and human rights. In Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, the author, Frederick Douglass, uses powerful rhetoric to disprove the Pragmatic and the Scientific pro-slavery arguments of Pre-Civil War America. The Pragmatic Argument is about how many people believe that if all black slaves were to be freed, then this would result in convulsions which would then lead to extermination of the one or other race. Many people also believed that black slavery was necessary for American history.

In both autobiographies the author is presented with a challenge they must overcome to learn essential skills. The challenge that was presented to the author in “Story of My Life” was that she was deaf and she didn’t know that every word had a different name but also didn’t realize that the same word could identify 2 different objects. The challenge is addressed when Miss Sullivan took her to the well-house and she let her feel the water and the author remembered what water was exactly and that helped her to realize that all objects could have different names. The challenge that was presented to the author in “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave” was that he wanted to read and write but he was not allowed to. The

Frederick Douglass, born a slave and later the most influential African American leader of the 1800s, addresses the hypocrisy of the US of maintaining slavery with its upheld ideals being freedom and independence on July 4th, 1852. Douglass builds his argument by using surprising contrasts, plain facts, and provocative antithesis. Introducing his subject, Douglass reminds his audience about the dark side of America for slaves, in sharp, surprising contrasts with the apparent progressivity within the nation. He first notices “the disparity,” that “the sunlight that brought life and healing to you, has brought stripes and deaths to me,” as an African-American former slave. It is surprising for the audience to hear that the Sun does not bring him any prosperity, that the Sun, the source of life on earth, brings him destruction.

Slavery is equally a mental and a physical prison. Frederick Douglass realized this follow-ing his time as both a slave and a fugitive slave. Douglass was born into slavery because of his mother’s status as a slave. He had little to go off regarding his age and lineage. In the excerpt of the “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass

Is an attended audience evident? Explain your answer. The attended audience would appeal to those who are in slavery, witnessed it, who went through it, and who are against it. Frederick Douglas is a former American slave and an aggressive abolitionists. He changed the way Americans viewed slavery and pushed for freedom.