Nelson Mandela 1. The speech is in the plural ‘We’ and not in the first person. This maybe because both he and De Klerk both won the prize or because he accepted on behalf of the nation as De Klerk had his own speech. 2. The person who shall have done the most or best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies for holding and promotion of peace congresses - look at this. 3. Thanked everyone who was involved in Apartheid. Apartheid is spelt with a capital A, which is quite interesting as it is very important. 4. He pays respect to Martin Luther King Jr. He appreciates the work done by him for freedom, humanity and for blacks or as MLK said ‘negroes’. NM does not say Negroes but he makes a speech for all mankind, irrespective of race, religion, gender or creed [but …show more content…
He says that it can never happen again, in part he along with his people have achieved what they set out to do. It shows that he is humble but also afraid that things can sometimes go backwards. He is asking/telling people for support. 8. He tells the world that there are those who do not want or believe in the change. This again shows his vulnerability. 9. He is accepting the prize for future peace, this is something MLK accepted the Nobel Peace Price for. Not for the past or present peace but being optimist of future humanity and peace. MLK mentioned it in his speech as Nelson Mandela mentioned in his ‘we do not believe this Nobel Peace Prize is intended as a commendation for matters that have happened and passed.’ 10. He challenges the MLK quote ‘Humanity can no longer be tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war.’ 11. De Klerks speech focused on moving forward from Apartheid, about how strong the country is and creating a better society. 12. Nelson Mandela does not mention his family or his children. His speech is about the country, the nation and about world peace and negation of inhumane treatment
This address is almost means as a warning. This warning is to correct the unjust system, or for the State to watch itself become overthrown by civil disobedience. This warning is concluded in articulating the problems of the State with unjust laws. He writes with the paradox, “Justice too long delayed is justice denied.” After targeting the problems of the state, MLK heads to an audience from the state to the people.
In 1963, while Martin Luther King was in Birmingham Jail, King delivered a powerful letter to his Clergymen in order to take time and respond to the criticism he had received over his work in Birmingham. The Letter from Birmingham Jail addresses many problems, including the slow action occuring to stop racial discrimination. In order to do this, Martin Luther King uses several techniques in paragraph thirteen and fourteen of his letter such as repetition, personification, as well as allusion, to support his claim that racial unity has taken too long. To emphasize the passing of time and the need to take action now, King uses repetition and allusions in paragraph thirteen to assist his claims. King starts strongly with the bold statement “freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed”, which in this case, the oppressors refer to the whites, and the oppressed are the negroes.
Robert began his speech with giving the rough news on Martin Luther King’s death. People reacted with gasps and cries, so Robert started to explain Martin’s goal and how he died pushing for a change. Robert connected his point of unity by asking the audience to not resort to hatred and violence, but to follow Martin’s dream of unity and peace. He explained how the country has gone through hard times and has always recovered and how there will be more hard
RFK said, ”But we have to make an effort in the United States. We have to make an effort to understand, to get beyond, or go beyond these rather difficult times.” RFK wants the audience to make an effort to stop the situation in the United States. He also relates to MLK gain by saying, ”what we need in the United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love, and wisdom, and compassion.” RFK wants people to act with peace, and love.
Analysis: He first begins his speech with raising awareness and not shying away from the vulgar and disturbing actions of hatred that were allowed at the time. He does not shy away from using the word “death”, which for obvious reasons, has a negative connotation associated with it. He continues the speech by addressing the issues that the world is currently facing. He addresses 3 main issues of war, racial segregation and injustices and
In the speech MLK states “One hundred years later the negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the negro is still crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination.” In his speech he repeats the saying “One hundred years later” he is doing this to show that African Americans that they have not been equal to whites for 100 years. These few words are MLKS way of telling the audience that even after the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation 100 years ago that there is still segregation. After all the accomplishments for African Americans they are still being treated differently than whites.
RFK takes an optimistic stance, he states: “What we need in the United States is not violence or lawlessness; but love and wisdom, and compassion to others” (32-33). This quote recognizes the impact of MLK’s death, and advocates for the audience to act peacefully because RFK still believes in the civil rights movement. The tone throughout the speech is honest, instead of cowering away from the idea of revenge he confronts it. For example, he says “For those of you who are black considering the evidence evidently is that there were white people who were responsible you can be filled with bitterness… and a desire for
King also received a Nobel Peace Award. This speech was so powerful that it took a step forward in fixing injustice racial problems in
Nelson Mandela gave the speech in a courtroom where he and a few other ANC leaders were being accused of sabotage, furthering communism, and aiding foreign powers. He gave this speech to explain the actions that seemed out of place constitutionally for the ANC. He explains
Title: Outlining Basics General Purpose: To inform Specific purpose: To inform the audience about the Mandela Effect Thesis: The Mandela Effect is a name for an instance where a person or a group of people remember an event, or word, etc. in a different way than it actually happened or is. I. Introduction Attention Getter: Have you ever brought up a memory from your childhood to your parents, only to be told that this event never actually took place?
Martin Luther King Jr. was a leader in the African American Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, he was known for his nonviolent movements and methods of protesting. This involved many African American citizens to take verbal and physical abuse from the police and not being able to do anything about it. He used his words to inspire the nation into taking action, instead of promoting violence. Dr. King gave his “I Have a Dream” speech in front of thousands of United States citizen from all different backgrounds at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington. Kings uses ethos to point out why segregation was unjust and to justify why African Americans deserves the same rights as the white citizens of the United States.
Mandela was a leader in African National Congress. The story says that “he was in a political party that opposed South Africa’s policy of racial segregation.” Mandela became the world’s best-known political prisoner. In the story it says, “he was sentenced to life prison, but he never gave up.” In 1990 he was released, and became South Africa’s first black president.
By using the rhetorical features, MLK’s speech reached a different level of effectiveness for his audience. Using credibility, authority, trustworthiness and similarity to build a relationship by using evidence, MLK achieved ethos. Then by stating his values and creating imagery achieved but hos vocabulary he effective used pathos. Finally, by his clarity, goals, evidence and consistency, MLK appropriately reached his audience logical and effectively using logos. Martin Luther King Jr. is remembered for his great speeches, accomplishments and his leadership skills, but also for the sincerity of his heart for the freedom and unity of all people.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. developed his argument through his speech. He has set an speech out to everyone, so everyone can be /or will be treated equally, fairly. Martin Luther King to contribute a great deal to the success of the civil rights movement. He wanted his idea to come true, so he did everything he could do for it to happen. As to him proving his point to make people believe or go with his idea.
NELSON MANDELA Nelson Mandela is one of the influence people in the 20th century politics. He was the first black president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999 and elected by fully representative democratic election. He was also a politician, an activist, fighting against HIV/AIDS in Africa, promoting global peace and South African anti apartheid revolutionary. One thing that he did for the Africans and affects the world was about to end the apartheid, a system that try to separated the races of black skin over white skin people in South Africa. Because of him right now there is no differentiate between those people again.